¹ Manchester Guardian [hereafter MG], 11th 05 1912.Google Scholar

² For this debate see Clarke, P.F., Lancashire and the New Liberalism (Cambridge, 1971);CrossRefGoogle ScholarWald, K.D., Crosses on the Ballots (Princeton, 1983);CrossRefGoogle ScholarKeith, Burgess, The Challenge of Labour: Shaping British Society 1850–1930 (Beckenham, 1980);Google ScholarAlun, Howkins, “Edwardian Liberalism and industrial unrest: a class view of the decline of Liberalism”, History Workshop Journal, no 4 (1977).Google Scholar

³ Walker, M.W., “Irish immigrants in Scotland: their priests, politics and parochial life”, Historical Journal, vol. XV, no 4 (1972), p. 663;Google ScholarSheridan, Gilley, “English attitudes to the Irish in England 1789–1900,” in Holmes, C. (ed.), immigrants and Minorities in British Society (London, 1978), pp. 104–106.Google Scholar

⁴ Hamer, D.A., Liberal Politics in rheAge of Gladstone and Rosebery (Oxford, 1972), p. 153.Google Scholar

⁵ Hutchison, I.G.C., “Glasgow working-class politics” in Cage, R.A. (ed.), The Working Class in Glasgow, 1750–1914 (Beckenham, 1987), p. 133.Google Scholar

⁶ As pointed out in Steele, E.D., “The Irish presence in the north of England 1850–1914,” Northern History, vol. XII (1976), p. 241.Google Scholar

⁷ Moody, T.W., “Michael Davilt and the British labour movement 1882–1906,” Transactions of the Royal Historical Society, 5th series, vol. 3 (1953).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁸ See Philip, Snowden's comments in Labour Leader [hereafter LL], 31st 09 1918.Google Scholar

⁹ For the latest example of this type of study, Alan, O'Day, “The Irish Influence on Parliamentary Elections,” in Roger, Swift and Sheridan, Gilley (eds), The Irish in the Victorian City (Beckenham, 1986).Google Scholar

¹⁰ Howard, C.H.D., “The Parnell Manifesto of 21 November 1885 and the Schools Question“, English Historical Review, vol. LXII (1947), p. 49;CrossRefGoogle ScholarIan, Wood, “Irish immigrants and Scottish Radicalism, 1880–1906”, in Ian, MacDougall (ed.), Essays in Scottish Labour History (Edinburgh, 1978), p. 72.Google Scholar

¹¹ Chris, Wrigley, “Labour and the trade unions”, in Brown, K.D. (ed.), The First Labour Party 1906–1914 (Beckenham, 1985), p. 152.Google Scholar

¹² Paul, Thompson, Socialists, Liberals and Labour. The Struggle for London, 1885–1914 (London, 1967), pp. 25–27;Google ScholarAlan, O'Day, The English Face of irish Nationalism (Dublin, 1977), pp. 118–125.Google Scholar

¹³ 1851 Census. For further background for the Irish experience in Manchester during this earlier period see Frederick, Engels, The Condition of the Working Class in England (London, 1979), pp. 87–88, 93–98, 100;Google ScholarWerly, J.M., “The Irish in Manchester 1832–1849”, Irish Historical Studies, vol. XVIII, no 71 (1973).Google Scholar

¹⁴ 1901 Census.

¹⁵ John, Denvir, The Life Story of an Old Rebel (Dublin, 1910), P. 2.Google Scholar

¹⁶ In 1900 there were 1.6 million Irish-born in the U.S. and 1.8 million of their offspring (figure includes the American-born spouses of the Irish-born). Stephan, Thernstrom (ed.), The Harvard Encyclopedia of American Ethnic Groups (Cambridge, Mass, 1980), p. 528, Table 2.Google Scholar

¹⁷ John, Denvir, The Irish in Britain from the Earliest Times to the Fall and Death of Parnell (London, 1892), p. 430.Google Scholar

¹⁸ “The Irish in Manchester (By One of Them)” (1887), “Manchester” cuttings collection, Local History Department, Manchester Public Library.

¹⁹ Figure based upon estimates of parish population contained in the Salford Diocesan Handbook (Manchester, 1900).Google Scholar

²⁰ Irene, Boocock, “Angel Meadow: A Study of a Migrant Community in Victorian Manchester” (B.A. dissertation, Manchester Polytechnic, 1980), p.59; Census of households in St. Michael's (Church of England) parish, c. late nineteenth century, M330/216, Manchester Archives Department, Manchester Public Library; Salford Diocesan Census, 1900, available Bishop's House, Wardley Hall [hereafter Salford Census].Google Scholar

²¹ Salford Census.

²² Salford Census; Religious creed registers for New Bridge St. workhouse, M4/11/1–31, Archives Department, Manchester Public Library.

²³ Manchester Studies Oral History Collection, Manchester Polytechnic [hereafter Manchester Studies], tapes 122(1), 266, 823(1), 1024.

²⁴ Manchester Faces and Places [hereafter MFP], vol. X (1899).

²⁵ Manchester City News [hereafter MCNI], 22nd 04 1899; Manchester Catholic Herald [hereafter MCH], 26th 01, 2nd 02 1906, 22nd 02 1908.Google Scholar

²⁶ Mick, Burke, Ancoats Lad (Swinton, 1985), pp. 4, 43.Google Scholar

²⁷ This conclusion is based upon estimates contained in various local newspapers. Herbert Gladstone considered these divisions to be “dominated” by the Irish, cited in Clarke, Lancashire and the New Liberalism, Appendix C.

²⁸ MCH, 7th 05 1910.Google Scholar

²⁹ MG, 18th, 23rd 03; MCH, 30th 03, 20th 04, 11th 05 1906.Google Scholar

³⁰ For the way Manchester's Conservatives used the pub for their own purposes, Geoffrey, Seuss Law, “Manchester's Politics, 1885–1906” (Ph.D., University of Pennsylvania, 1975), pp. 210–211 [hereafter “Manchester's Politics”].Google Scholar

³¹ MCH, 26th 07, 12th 08 1892. The National League was a precursor of the UIL.Google Scholar

³² MCH, 9th 11 1907.Google Scholar

³³ Arthur, G. Symonds, “Unfashionable Manchester”, East Lancashire Review, vol. 3, no XVIII (1899).Google Scholar

³⁴ MG, 9th 11 1890.Google Scholar

³⁵ MG, 17th 03 1913.Google Scholar

³⁶ At least according to the Chairman of the INL's O'Connell branch, Ancoats, , MG, 9th 04 1892.Google Scholar

³⁷ Lyons, F.S.L., “The revolutionary generation”, in Lyons, Culture and Anarchy in Ireland, 1890–1939 (Oxford, 1979).Google Scholar

³⁸ MCH, 26th 02 1904.Google Scholar

³⁹ MG, 18th 03 1898.Google Scholar

⁴⁰ MG, 20th 03 1900.Google Scholar

⁴¹ MG, 2nd 02 1892.Google Scholar

⁴² MG, 9th 07 1894, 19th 03 1895, 17th 03 1911 02 1913.Google Scholar

⁴³ MG, 20th 03 1900.Google Scholar

⁴⁴ MG, 7th 06 1897.Google Scholar

⁴⁵ For the example of 1903, a very bleak year indeed for the prospects of Home Rule, see MG, 18th 03 1903.Google Scholar

⁴⁶ For example see MG, 19th 03 1895, 20th 03 1899, 18th 03 1904.Google Scholar

⁴⁷ For the description of such a rally, Daily Dispatch, 18th 03 1901.Google Scholar

⁴⁸ MG, 18th 03 1890, 20th 03 1899, 18th 03 1901 and 19th 03 1906;Google ScholarSheehy-Skeffington, F., Michael Davitt: Revolutionary Agitator and Labour Leader (London, 1908), pp. 5–6.Google Scholar

⁴⁹ Denvir, , Life Story of an Old Rebel, p. 253.Google Scholar

⁵⁰ MCH, 13th 06 1908.Google Scholar

⁵¹ MCH, 5th, 12th 03 1910.Google Scholar

⁵² MCH, 1st 11 1910.Google Scholar

⁵³ MCH, 28th 09 1905.Google Scholar

⁵⁴ This point was made by the Preston Catholic Herald during a by-election in 1903. Cited in Bealy, F., Peffing, H., Labour and Politics, 1900–1906 (London, 1958), P. 149.Google Scholar

⁵⁵ MCH, 7th 09 1907.Google Scholar On Wheatly see David, Howell, A Lost Left. Three Studies in Socialism and Nationalism (Manchester, 1986), pp. 229–280.Google Scholar

⁵⁶ MG, 18th 02 1895.Google Scholar

⁵⁷ MG, 28th 06 1892.Google Scholar

⁵⁸ Salford City Reporter, 18th 02 1955.Google Scholar

⁵⁹ MG, 1st 11 1906.Google Scholar

⁶⁰ MCH, 25th 01 1908; MG, 7th 09 1909.Google Scholar

⁶¹ For the details of this arrangement see MG, 24th 10 1890, 21st 10 1891, 8th 12 1910; MCN, 28th 10 1905.Google Scholar

⁶² MG, 31st 10 1894.Google Scholar

⁶³ Denvir, , Irish in Britain, pp. 376–378.Google Scholar

⁶⁴ MG, 9th 03 1891.Google Scholar

⁶⁵ MG, 18th 03 1891.Google Scholar

⁶⁶ Denvir, , Irish in Britain, p. 381.Google Scholar

⁶⁷ Manchester Courier, 19th 03 1894; MG, 25th 03 1893, 20th 03 1899.Google Scholar

⁶⁸ MG, 28th 01 1890, 1st 09 1891.Google Scholar

⁶⁹ MG, 13th 10 1909.Google Scholar

⁷⁰ Joan, Smith, “Labour tradition in Glasgow and Liverpool”, History Workshop Journal, no 17 (1984), p. 46.Google Scholar

⁷¹ MG, 8th 02 1897.Google Scholar

⁷² MG, 17th 02 1897.Google Scholar

⁷³ MG, 17th 05 1899.Google Scholar

⁷⁴ Mary, McCarthy, Generation in Revolt (London, 1953), PP. 4, 13, 22–26.Google Scholar

⁷⁵ MG, 14th, 15th 10 1891.Google Scholar

⁷⁶ North-west Manchester Liberal Association minutes, 13th May 1912 and attached letter from Kemp explaining his conduct, M283/411/1, Archives Department, Manchester Public Library.

⁷⁷ MG, 23rd 10 1907.Google Scholar

⁷⁸ Thomas Freeman Kelly thought it was the only difference separating Irish and English Liberals, MG, 31st 01 1891.Google Scholar

⁷⁹ MG 9th 10 1897.Google Scholar

⁸⁰ When McCabe was elected Mayor in 1913 an Irish tramguard excitedly telegraphed the news to his wife on holiday in Ireland, Manchester Studies, tape 794.

⁸¹ This account is based upon MFP, vol. VIII (1897); Manchester Evening Chronicle [hereafter MEC], 12th 11 1906; MCN, 22nd 08 1925;Google ScholarStevenson, M. and Lees, S. (eds), Who's Who of British Members Of Parliament, vol. II (London, 1978).Google Scholar

⁸² This account is based upon MFP, vol. VIII (1987); MEC, 28th 01 1907; MCN, 13th 01 1912; Catholic Federationist, 11 1913; Harvest, 03 1895, 11 1919, 05 1922;Google ScholarPatrick', St.Silver Jublilee Souvenir (Manchester, 1961).Google Scholar

⁸³ Philip, Whitaker, “The Growth of Liberal Organisation in Manchester From the 1860s to 1903” (Ph.D., University of Manchester, 1956), p. 221.Google Scholar

⁸⁴ MG, 27th 10 1893, 21st and 25th 10 1895.Google Scholar

⁸⁵ MCN, 22nd 10 1904.Google Scholar

⁸⁶ MG, 19th 10 1895.Google Scholar

⁸⁷ MG, 21st 10 1897.Google Scholar

⁸⁸ Leslie, Bather, “A History of Manchester and Salford Trades Council” (Ph.D., University of Manchester, 1956), p. 167.Google Scholar

⁸⁹ Law, , “Manchester's Politics”, p. 67.Google Scholar

⁹⁰ Edward, M. Levine, The Irish and Irish Politicians (Notre Dame, 1966), pp. 112–113;Google ScholarDennis, Clark, The Irish in Philadelphia (Philadelphia, 1973), pp. 136–42.Google Scholar

⁹¹ MG, 25th 10 1895.Google Scholar

⁹² MG, 25th 10 1907.Google Scholar

⁹³ MG, 25th 12 1917.Google Scholar

⁹⁴ MG, 25th 03 1906; letter dated 27th 07 1906, LAB/101/CLS/L96/1906, Public Record Office.Google Scholar

⁹⁵ MG, 1st 11 1906.Google Scholar

⁹⁶ MG, 19th 10 1900.Google Scholar

⁹⁷ MG, 1st 11 1906.Google Scholar

⁹⁸ MG, 24th 10 1896;Google ScholarRowe, H.C., The Boggart Hole Contest (Manchester, 1896);Google ScholarFred, Reid, “Keir Hardie and the ‘Labour Leader’, 1893–1903”, in Jay, Winter (ed.), The Working Class in Modern British History (Cambridge, 1983), pp. 24–28.Google Scholar

⁹⁹ Clarion, 30th 06 1894.Google Scholar

¹⁰⁰ MG, 11th 07 1895. My emphasis.Google Scholar

¹⁰¹ In 1898 there were only a reported 500 members in the District ILP, ILP News, 12 1898.Google Scholar

¹⁰² LL, 20th 07 1894.Google Scholar

¹⁰³ Clarion, 31st 03, 21st 04 1894.Google Scholar

¹⁰⁴ Joe, Toole, Fighting Through Life (London, 1935), p. 100.Google Scholar

¹⁰⁵ Justice, 30th 08 1902;Google ScholarDesmond Greaves, C., The Life and Times of James Connolly (London, 1961), pp. 107–108.Google Scholar

¹⁰⁶ Jeffry, Hill, “Manchester and Salford politics and the early development of the Independent Labour Party”, International Review of Social History, vol. XXVI (1981), pp. 191–196;Google ScholarReid, N., “The Manchester and Salford ILP”, North West Labour History Bulletin, no 5 (1978–1979).Google Scholar

¹⁰⁷ The formation of the LRC in London also marked an improvement in London. Benjamin, H.W., “The London Irish: A Study in Political Activism, 1870–1910” (Ph.D., University of Princeton, 1976), pp. 323–326.Google Scholar

¹⁰⁸ MCH, 5th 01 1906.Google Scholar

¹⁰⁹ MG, 2nd, 3rd 01 1906.Google Scholar

¹¹⁰ MG, 19th 03 1906.Google Scholar

¹¹¹ MG 25th 11 1910;Google ScholarNeal, Blewett, The Peers, the Parties and the People (London, 1972), pp. 90–91.Google Scholar

¹¹² MG, 8th 01 1910.Google Scholar

¹¹³ MG, 25th 10 1909.Google Scholar

¹¹⁴ Heyk, T.W., “Home Rule, Radicalism and the Liberal party, 1885–1895,” Journal of British Studies, vol. XIII (1974), pp. 68–69.Google Scholar

¹¹⁵ David, Howell, British Workers and the ILP, 1888–1906 (Manchester, 1983), p. 210.Google Scholar

¹¹⁶ MG, 24th 11 1910. My emphasis.Google Scholar

¹¹⁷ MG, 23rd 11 1910.Google Scholar

¹¹⁸ MG, 19th 08 1900, 2nd, 9th 01 1906; LL, 23rd 11 1910.Google Scholar

¹¹⁹ Clarke, P.F., “The Progressive movement in England,” Royal Historical Society Transacdons, 5th series, vol. 24 (1974), pp. 175–177.Google Scholar

¹²⁰ MG, 31st 10 1903, 1st 10 1904, 1st 10 1910, 31st 10 1912.Google Scholar

¹²¹ MG, 10th 01 1910.Google Scholar

¹²² MG, 5th, 6th 01 1910.Google Scholar

¹²³ MG, 24th, 25th, 28th, 30th 12 1910.Google Scholar

¹²⁴ MG, 23rd November; Blewett, , Peers, p. 351.Google Scholar

¹²⁵ Blewett, , Peers, p. 324.Google Scholar

¹²⁶ Blewett, , Peers, p. 352.Google Scholar

¹²⁷ lain, MacLean, The Legend of the Red Clydeside (Edinburgh, 1983), pp. 193–194.Google Scholar

¹²⁸ For more detailed background see Blewett, , Peers, pp. 24–29.Google Scholar

¹²⁹ MCH, 15th 01 1910. My emphasis.Google Scholar

¹³⁰ MG, 14th 01 1910; LL, 21st 01 1910.Google Scholar

¹³¹ For Edinburgh see Bernard Aspinall and John F. McCaffrey, “A comparative view of the Irish in Edinburgh in the nineteenth century”, in Swift, and Gilley, , Victorian City, p. 146;Google Scholar for Glasgow see MacLean, , Clydeside, pp. 193–194, 200.Google Scholar

¹³² Dan, McDermott, “Labour and Ireland” in Brown, , The First Labour Party, pp. 260, 265.Google Scholar

¹³³ Whilst North Manchester remained the possession of a radical Liberal, North-east went Labour in 1906 and thereafter, East went to Labour in January 1910 and South-west was held by Labour in 1906 only.

¹³⁴ Manchester Liberal Federation, General Committee, minutes 7th July 1911, 6th June 1913, M283/1/4/1, Archives Department, Manchester Public Library.

¹³⁵ MCH, 10th 12 1910.Google Scholar

¹³⁶ Father Sheehey UIL branch supported Labour in St. George's ward, Hulme, . MCH, 29th 08 1910.Google Scholar

¹³⁷ This is David Howell's general interpretation of the transition from Liberalism to Labour, , “Was the Labour party inevitable?”, North West Labour Hfrtory Society Bulletin, no 10 (1984–1985).Google Scholar

¹³⁸ LL, 2nd 12 1910.Google Scholar

¹³⁹ Evening Chronicle, 20th 12 1946.Google Scholar

¹⁴⁰ Manchester Studies, tape 87.

¹⁴¹ On the general effect of “trauma” on post-war political allegiances, Wald, , Crosses on the Ballots, pp. 252–254.Google Scholar

¹⁴² Gareth, Stedman Jones, Outcast London (London, 1984), pp. 341–344;Google ScholarRobert, Roberts, Classic Slum (London, 1983), PP. 30–31, 167–168;Google ScholarJerry, White, The Worst Street in North London (London, 1986), pp. 105–112.Google Scholar

¹⁴³ MG, 3rd 12 1923.Google Scholar

¹⁴⁴ Ramsay MacDonald, J., The Socialist Movement (London, 1912), p. 93.Google Scholar

¹⁴⁵ LL, 21st 01 1910.Google Scholar

¹⁴⁶ Neil, Richardson, The Old Pubs of Ancoats (Swinton, 1987), p. 3.Google Scholar

¹⁴⁷ Tom Regan, “Labour members of Manchester City Council, 1894–1965”, BRF/352/04273/ RE1, Archives Department, Manchester Public Library. This was also the case in Glasgow, , MacLean, , Clydeside, pp. 183–184.Google Scholar

¹⁴⁸ This was similar to the voting pattern found in Liverpool. Davies, R.S.W., “The Liverpool Labour Party and the Liverpool working-class,” North West Labour History Society Bulletin, no 6 (1979–1980).Google Scholar