No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
The Independent Labour Party and the Yorkshire Miners: The Barnsley By-Election of 1897*
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 December 2008
Extract
Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
The Independent Labour Party was formed early in 1893, at a time when its founders hoped that reformist, undogmatic Socialism would soon attract the support of large numbers of working men. This was a hope shared by others committed to a more rigorous Socialist ideology. Even Friedrich Engels, convinced that the formation of a political party sustained by the working class was the task of greatest importance, hailed the ILP as the body desired by the old members of the International of the 1860's. But the early hopes were short-lived. Everyone of its twenty-eight candidates was defeated at the General Election of 1895, even Keir Hardie, the party's leader, who had been elected at West Ham without Liberal opposition in 1892. Many of the candidates polled well, but the overall result was a deep disappointment. In four subsequent by-elections between May 1896 and October 1897, ILP candidates of proven ability, while finding considerable support among the electorate, finished last on each occasion, and the trend of election results grew worse rather than better. The ILP polled thousands of votes rather than the few hundreds of the Marxist body, the Social Democratic Federation, but this was small consolation. In terms of membership and general party activity the years after 1895 also marked a regression. Gradually Hardie and his colleages became convinced that winning the workers to Socialism by means of the ILP alone was not a feasible strategy. There was no way, in the short term, to further the cause of independent labour without the adhesion of the non-Socialist trade unions. This inevitably meant the soft-pedalling of Socialism. Defeated as a separate force, the ILP was forced to accept the idea of an alliance with the trade unions, in the hope that any form of labour party would first become independent of the Liberals and eventually Socialist. The first assumption proved correct, the second on the whole incorrect, but it is difficult to see what other course could have been pursued at the time. Thus the years between 1895 and 1900, the vital pre-history of the Labour Party, were years which were to stamp it at its birth in 1900 as a party of practical trade unionists, fighting for limited aims, with a smattering of Socialists whose influence failed to dominate the party programme or strategy.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Internationaal Instituut voor Sociale Geschiedenis 1978
References
1 Pelling, Henry, The Origins of the Labour Party, 1880–1900, 2nd ed. (London, 1965), p. 123, note.Google Scholar
2 Ibid., pp. 173–74, 179–81; Pierson, Stanley, Marxism and the Origins of British Socialism (Ithaca, 1973), ch. 9Google Scholar; Cole, G. D. H., British Working Class Politics 1832–1914 (London, 1941), pp. 268, 272–75Google Scholar; Morgan, Kenneth, Keir Hardie: Radical and Socialist (London, 1975), pp. 90–98.Google Scholar
3 MFGB, Annual Conference Report, 1897, p. 36Google Scholar; Arnot, R. Page, The Miners (London, 1949), p. 393.Google Scholar
4 See the biographies of each of these men in the Dictionary of Labour Biography, ed. by Bellamy, Joyce and Saville, John: Pickard, Cowey and Frith in Vol. I (1972), Parrott in Vol. II (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar See also Neville, “The Yorkshire Miners”, op. cit., biographical appendix.
5 This description is drawn from Lodge's Barnsley & District Almanack and Trades' Directory for 1898, unpaginated; The Barnsley Red Book, Almanack, and Directory, 1899, pp. 17–18, 123–35Google Scholar; Robinson's Barnsley Directory (1902), pp. 11, 173Google Scholar; Census of England and Wales, 1901, County of York; Area, Houses and Population [Cd 1107], pp. 9, 71–79,258,260; Sheffield Daily Telegraph, 23 September and 29 October 1897; Labour Leader (hereafter LL), 9 October.
6 Barnsley Chronicle (hereafter BC), 23 October 1897; Sheffield & Rotherham Independent (hereafter S&RI), 27 October; Pall Mall Gazette, 23 and 28 October. Gregory, Roy, The Miners and British Politics 1906–1914 (London, 1968), p. 138Google Scholar, suggests that forty-six percent of the voters in the Barnsley division were miners in about 1910, and if the anomalies of electoral law which bore harshly on working-class voters are borne in mind, 7,000 miner voters in 1897 would seem an approximately accurate figure. See also sources cited in note 53.
7 ILP, NAC minutes, 22 April, 3 July and 1 October 1896, 5 January and 21 April 1897, British Library of Political and Economic Science; Leeds Mercury (hereafter LM), 22 September 1897; Barnsley Independent (hereafter BI), 2 October; Standard, 23 October; LL, 6 November; I.L.P. News, November; ILP, Annual Conference Report, 1897, p. 7Google Scholar; ibid., 1898, p. 19. Barnsley delegates attending the annual conference in April 1897 represented 60 members, ibid., 1897, p. 3.
8 LL, 2 October 1897.
9 There is a voluminous and many-sided, but generally fragmentary, literature on this subject, to which the foregoing discussion is heavily indebted. For an admirably balanced and concise synthesis, with a valuable list of sources, see Kynaston, David, King Labour: The British Working Class 1850–1914 (London, 1976).Google ScholarTholfsen, Trygve, Working Class Radicalism in Mid-Victorian England (London, 1976)Google Scholar, provides an authoritative analysis of the background to the late-Victorian period. For an illustration of the way in which belated trade unionism lacking roots in Liberalism could develop in close collaboration with ILP Socialism, see Reynolds, J. and Layboun, K., “The Emergence of the Independent Labour Party in Bradford”, in: International Review of Social History, XX (1975), pp. 313–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10 Gregory, The Miners, op. cit., pp. 4–5; Clegg, H. A., Fox, Alan and Thompson, A. F., A History of British Trade Unions since 1889, I: 1889–1910 (Oxford, 1964), pp. 246–47, 275–76Google Scholar; Challinor, Raymond, The Lancashire and Cheshire Miners (Newcastle, 1972), chs 13 and 14.Google Scholar For a description of the Conservative appeal to working-class voters considered historically, see McKenzie, Robert and Silver, Allan, Angels in Marble (London, 1968), ch. 2.Google Scholar
11 Trades Union Congress, Annual Report, 1892, p. 70Google Scholar; ibid., 1893, pp. 44–48; MFGB, Annual Conference Report, 1894, p. 26.
12 MFGB, Annual Conference Report, 1894, p. 15Google Scholar; ibid., 1897, pp. 36–67. See also ibid., 1902, pp. 68–72. The 1897 debate is summarised in Arnot, R. Page, A History of the Scottish Miners (London, 1955), pp. 93–96Google Scholar, and Duffy, “The Growth of Trade Unionism”, op. cit., pp. 573–78.
13 See Saville, John, “Notes on Ideology and the Miners before World War I”, in: Bulletin of the Society for the Study of Labour History, No 23 (1971), pp. 25–26Google Scholar; id., “The Ideology of Labourism”, in: Knowledge and Belief in Politics: The Problem of Ideology, ed. by Benewick, Robert, Berki, R. N. and Parekh, Bikhu (London, 1973), p. 219.Google Scholar
14 Report of Yorkshire Miners' Demonstration, 1897, included with YMA, Minutes and Reports, 1897, pp. 5,9,10. For statistics of Yorkshire miners and coal production between 1874 and 1920, see Gibson, Finlay, A Compilation of Statistics of the Coal Mining Industry o the United Kingdom (Cardiff, 1922), p. 22.Google Scholar In addition to the 72,000 men who worked underground, there were about 18,000 surface workers attached to the Yorkshire mines in 1897 (ibid.), few of whom would have belonged to the YMA.
15 MFGB, Annual Conference Report, 1898, p. 5.Google Scholar
16 Arnot, The Miners, op. cit., chs III, IV and VIII. Hours spent underground by Yorkshire miners varied over time and place, but in the 1890's probably averaged about 8¾ a day. I am grateful to Dr Neville for assistance on this point. See also McCormick, B. and Williams, J. E., “The Miners and the Eight-Hour Day, 1863–1910”, in: Economic History Review, Second Series, XII (1959), esp. pp. 226, 228, 238.Google Scholar
17 MFGB, Annual Conference Report, 1897, pp. 54–55Google Scholar; BC, 23 October 1897.
18 S&RI, 16 October 1897. For Rymer, an interesting character, see Neville, “The Yorkshire Miners”, pp. 977–84. See also Neville's introduction and Rymer's reprinted autobiography, The Martyrdom of the Mine (1898), in: History Workshop Journal, No 1 (1976), pp. 220–44Google Scholar, and No 2 (1976), pp. 148–70; cf. ibid., No 3 (1977), pp. 200–02.
19 MFGB, Annual Conference Report, 1897, p. 44Google Scholar; ibid., 1900, p. 3; S&RI, 26 October 1897; Wakefield Free Press, 30 October.
20 LM, 1 October 1897. For Potts, see Dictionary of Labour Biography, II, and Neville, “The Yorkshire Miners”, pp. 970–71.
21 Gregory, , The Miners, pp. 106–07.Google Scholar
22 TUC, Annual Report, 1890, p. 37.Google Scholar
23 Cole, British Working Class Politics, op. cit., pp. 264–71.
24 TUC, Annual Report, 1890, p. 37Google Scholar; MFGB, Annual Report, 1898–1899, p. 25.Google Scholar For a vivid recollection of Cowey and his support for labour representation, see Rogers, Frederick, Labour, Life and Literature (London, 1913; reprinted Brighton 1973, ed. by Rubinstein, David), p. 219.Google Scholar Cowey's principal contribution was to move repeated resolutions at the TUC during the 1890's in favour of payment of MPs and official election expenses.
25 MFGB, Annual Reports and Annual Conference Reports, 1898–1902.Google Scholar See summaries in Arnot, , The Miners, pp. 352–62Google Scholar; Gregory, , The Miners, pp. 19–20, 23–25Google Scholar; Duffy, , “The Growth of Trade Unionism”, pp. 627–36, 770–73.Google Scholar Pickard did occasionally criticise the Liberals or strike an independent pose, but he maintained his Lib-Lab status to the end.
26 Beatrice Webb's diary (typescript transcription), 15 and 17 January 1896, British Library of Political and Economic Science.
27 Clarion, 30 October 1897; Times, 21 October; also Pete Curran in I.L.P. News, November.
28 BI, 6 November 1897.
29 Wearmouth, Robert, Methodism and the Struggle of the Working Classes 1850–1900 (Leicester, 1954), pp. 173–74, 194–96Google Scholar; id., The Social and Political Influence of Methodism in the Twentieth Century (London, 1957), pp. 144–50Google Scholar; Saville, “The Ideology of Labourism”, loc. cit., p. 219; Neville, , “The Yorkshire Miners”, pp. 447–48, 829–30Google Scholar, and biographical appendix. For an excellent study whose implications reach far beyond the local community, see Moore, Robert, Pit-men, Preachers and Politics; The effects of Methodism in a Durham mining community (London, 1974).CrossRefGoogle ScholarColls, Robert, The Collier's Rant (London, 1977)Google Scholar, is another recent historical study of the miners of the North-East, stressing the importance of Methodism and drawing heavily on verse, song and fiction.
30 MFGB, Report of Delegates' Meeting, 4 02 1904, pp. 5–6Google Scholar; Smillie, Robert, My Life for Labour (London, 1924), pp. 68–69Google Scholar; Lawson, Jack, The Man in the Cap (London, 1941), p. 85.Google Scholar See the tributes to Pickard in Arnot, , The Miners, pp. 53, 103, 207, 302, 322.Google Scholar
31 Pall Mall Gazette, 27 September 1897.
32 Figures for general and by-elections may be found in McCalmont, F. H., Parliamentary Poll Book of All Elections, 1832–1918, 8th ed. (Brighton, 1971).Google Scholar For the General Election of 1895, see TUC, Annual Report, 1895, pp. 27–31Google Scholar, and ILP, Annual Conference Report, 1896, pp. 4–5. 14–15Google Scholar; for the Bradford election, Times, 5 and 6 November 1896; for the Barnsley council election, BC and BI, 31 October and 7 November 1896; for Brightside, LL, 14 August 1897, ILP, NAC minutes, 9 October 1897, and Labour Chronicle, September; for York, ILP, Annual Conference Report, 1898, pp. 9–10.Google Scholar
33 Wakefield Free Press, 4 July 1896; LM, 10 September 1897.
34 MFGB, Annual Conference Report, 1897, pp. 43, 47, 51–52Google Scholar; Derbyshire Times, 11 September 1897; BC, 2 October.
35 Yorkshire Post (hereafter YP), 19 August 1897; S&RI, 27 and 28 September; BC, 23 October. For Lunn, see Dictionary of Labour Biography, II, and Neville, , “The Yorkshire Miners”, pp. 955–57.Google Scholar
36 LM, 30 October 1897.
37 S&RI, 30 September 1897.
38 BC, 30 October 1897.
39 British Parliamentary Election Results 1885–1918, ed. by Craig, F. W. S. (London, 1974), p. 432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
40 LM and Times, 16 September 1897.
41 YP, 28 October 1897; LL, 6 November.
42 LM, 18 September 1897.
43 BC, 25 September 1897.
44 YP, 22 September 1897; Daily News, 22 and 23 September; LL, 2 October.
45 ILP, Parliamentary Committee minutes, 15 09 1897Google Scholar, British Library of Political and Economic Science.
46 BC and BI, 25 September and 23 October 1897.
47 Evening Standard, 23 September 1897; YP, 20 October; BC, 23 October.
48 I am indebted to Barbara Nield for showing me an advance copy of her account of Curran from the Dictionary of Labour Biography, IV (1977).Google Scholar
49 Manchester Guardian, 27 September 1897.
50 BC, 23 October 1897; YP, 25 September.
51 Thome, Will, My Life's Battles (London [1925]), p. 94.Google Scholar
52 Times and Sheffield Daily Telegraph, 24 September 1897; YP, 28 September; BC, 16 and 23 October; Daily News, 30 October; Clegg, H. A., General Union in a Changing Society (Oxford, 1964), pp. 32, 34Google Scholar; Report by the Chief Labour Correspondent of the Board of Trade on Trade Unions in 1899 [Cd 422], pp. 122–23; quarterly balance sheets of National Union of Gasworkers and General Labourers, quarters ending 30 September and 31 December 1897, kindly supplied by Andrew Dismore of the General and Municipal Workers' Union.
53 Sheffield Daily Telegraph, 20 October 1897; S&RI, 30 October; Clegg, Fox and Thompson, A History of British Trade Unions, op. cit., I, pp. 269–71; Gregory, , The Miners, pp. 9, 190Google Scholar; Blewett, Neal, “The Franchise in the United Kingdom 1885–1918”. in: Past & Present, No 32 (1965), pp. 27–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar. See also -Matthew, H. C. G., McKibbin, R. I. and Kay, J. A., “The Franchise Factor in the Rise of the Labour Party”, in: English Historical Review, XCI (1976), pp. 723–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
54 S&RI, 19, 26 and 28 October 1897; BI, 25 September.
55 Daily News, 20 October 1897.
56 BC, 25 September and 2 October 1897; BI, 9 October; LM, 26 October.
57 LM, 21 September 1897; Wakefield Free Press, 2 October.
58 BC and BI, 2 October 1897; S&RI, 28 September and 1 October.
59 Manchester Guardian, 30 October 1897. The Daily Chronicle and the Leeds Mercury wrote on the same day in similar terms, affirming their belief in Liberal-Labour alliance. For an analysis of the intellectual rationale of the “New Liberalism” of the period, see Clarke, P. F., “The Progressive Movement in England”, in: Transactions of the Royal Historical Society, Fifth Series, XXIV (1974), pp. 159–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
60 BC, 16 October 1897.
61 Daily Chronicle, 25 September 1897; Wakefield and West Riding Herald, 2 October; BI, 6 November.
62 Pall Mall Gazette, 4, 18, 25 and 28 October 1897; Sheffield Daily Telegraph, 23 and 26–30 October; YP, 5, 16, 19, 20, 26 and 27 October; LM. 16 October; Annual Register, 1897, pp. [201–02].
63 Hewers in Durham and Northumberland worked a seven-hour or shorter day and opposed the eight-hour demands of their MFGB colleagues. There was also some opposition to the eight-hour day among miners in Lancashire and South Wales. Gregory, , The Miners, pp. 17–18.Google Scholar
64 Parliamentary Debates, Fourth Series, XLVIII, c. 1581 (5 05 1897)Google Scholar; YP, 1 October 1897; BI, 16 October; Pall Mall Gazette, 28 October.
65 BC, 16 October 1897. There are copies of Curran's election address and his first speech as adopted candidate (24 September) in the Barnsley Central Library and the National Museum of Labour History, London. The election address is also reprinted in Barbara Nield's account referred to in note 48. The address and the speech (the cover of the latter is reproduced by courtesy of the National Museum of Labour History) form a valuable document, since Curran was inadequately reported in much of the press.
66 LM and YP, 18 October 1897.
67 Times, 21 October 1897. For detailed accounts of the 1893 lock-out in the Yorkshire coalfield, see Neville, “The Yorkshire Miners”, ch. IV, and id., “The Yorkshire Miners and the 1893 Lockout: The Featherstone ‘Massacre’”, in: International Review of Social History, XXI (1976), pp. 337–57.Google Scholar Violence extended far beyond Featherstone (and indeed beyond Yorkshire), and affected both Barnsley and Wombwell.
68 Sheffield Daily Telegraph, 6, 26 and 28 October 1897.
69 BC, 25 September and 2 October 1897; YP, 28 September and 26 October; LL, 16 October.
70 Sheffield Daily Telegraph, 30 October 1897.
71 LM, 6 December 1897; Labour Chronicle, November.
72 YP, 27 September 1897.
73 S&RI, YP and other papers, 27 September 1897. The Wakefield Free Press, with which Pickard was on close terms, printed the letter two days earlier.
74 BC and BI, 23 October 1897.
75 LL, 25 December 1897 and 1 January 1898; ILP, NAC minutes, 3 January 1898.
76 YP, 15 October 1897; Morning Post, 27 October; S&RI, 29 October. Lodge's Barnsley & District Almanack, op. cit., estimated that between 500 and 600 meetings were held during the campaign.
77 BI, 16 October 1897.
78 Ibid., 9 October; Pall Mall Gazette, 24 September; Sheffield Daily Telegraph, 25 September; YP, 2 October; ILP, NAC minutes, 8 April 1898.
79 Wombwell's reputation was so described by the Daily News, 24 September 1897. Hardie's recollection of stone-throwing, which merely stated; “We were stoned by the miners”, was recorded in his pamphlet The I.L.P. and All About It [1909], p. 11. Subsequent writers have followed Hardie or the somewhat fuller but undocumented account by Arnot, , The Miners, p. 302.Google Scholar
80 Evening Standard, 23 September 1897; Echo, 23 September; YP, 24 September.
81 BC, 9 and 23 October 1897; YP, 6 and 15 October; Sheffield Daily Telegraph, 19, 20, 22, 26 and 27 October; S&RI, 15 and 20 October.
82 LM, 29 October 1897.
83 I.L.P. News, October 1897; LL, 9 and 23 October, 6 November; YP, 27 and 30 October.
84 Pall Mall Gazette, 25 October 1897; Sheffield Daily Telegraph, 27 October; LL, 6 November.
85 S&RI, 28 September 1897; BI, 2 October.
86 YP, 19 August, 1 and 21 October 1897; BI, 2 October; Pall Mall Gazette, 16 October; Manchester Guardian, 27 October.
87 Clarion, 30 October 1897. The Times correspondent also felt that Curran would win “something like a thousand votes” (23 October).
88 Daily News and Sheffield Daily Telegraph, 30 October 1897.
89 Lowe, David, From Pit to Parliament (London, 1923), p. 117Google Scholar; I.L.P. News, 11 1897.Google Scholar
90 LL, 2 October and 4 December 1897; 8 January 1898; ILP, NAC minutes, 9 October 1897, 8 January, 26 February and 8 April 1898; ILP, Annual Conference Report, 1898, pp. 19, 21.
91 LL, 6 November 1897; I.L.P. News, November; ILP, Annual Conference Report, 1898, p. 11.
92 LL, 25 December; Pelling, The Origins of the Labour Party, op. cit., p. 229.
93 LL, 20 and 27 November 1897; ILP, Annual Conference Report, 1898, p. 1. After 1898 no Barnsley delegates attended the annual conference until 1903, but party records suggest that the branch continued to exist with reduced numbers. Hemsworth also had an active branch early in the new century. Annual Conference Reports; Bealey, Frank and Pelling, Henry, Labour and Politics 1900–1906 (London, 1958), p. 223.Google Scholar
94 LL, 6 November 1897.
95 Morgan, Keir Hardie, op. cit., pp. 94–98.
96 Pelling, Henry, Popular Politics and Society in Late Victorian Britain (London, 1968), ch. 6, esp. p. 118Google Scholar; McKibbin, Ross, The Evolution of the Labour Party 1910–1924 (London, 1974), pp. xiv–xv, 70–71.Google Scholar For fuller discussions of Labourism see Saville, “The Ideology of Labourism”, loc. cit.; Coates, David, The Labour Party and the Struggle for Socialism (London, 1975), pp. 136–44Google Scholar; and Forester, Tom, The Labour Party and the Working Class (London, 1976), pp. 31–42.Google Scholar
97 Hardie, J. Keir and MacDonald, J. R., “The Independent Labour Party's Programme”, in: Nineteenth Century, XLV (1899), pp. 20–38.Google Scholar See also Crowley, D. W., “The Origins of the Revolt of the British Labour Movement from Liberalism 1875–1906” (London University Ph.D. thesis, 1952)Google Scholar, abstract and pp. 664–68; Reid, Fred, “Keir Hardie & the Origins of the Labour Party”, in: People for the People, ed. by Rubinstein, David (London, 1973), pp. 162, 164, 166–67Google Scholar; Morgan, Keir Haidie, ch. X; and Robert Gray's perceptive discussion in The Labour Aristocracy in Victorian Edinburgh (Oxford, 1976), chs 9 and 10.Google Scholar
98 Neville, “The Yorkshire Miners”, chs V and VI; id., “In the wake of Taff Vale: The Denaby and Cadeby miners' strike and conspiracy case, 1902–06”, in: Studies in the Yorkshire Coal Industry, ed. by Benson, J. and Neville, R. G. (Manchester, 1976), ch. 7Google Scholar; Duffy, , “The Growth of Trade Unionism”, pp. 699–708Google Scholar; Bealey and Pelling, Labour and Politics, op. cit., pp. 223–25.
99 LL, 7 October 1904, 8 September, 13 and 20 October 1905; Bealey and Pelling, Labour and Politics, pp. 222–27; Gregory, The Miners, pp. 104–19. Potts had worked with the ILP against the YMA leadership and Walton as early as 1905.
You have
Access