Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T19:20:03.808Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Complicating Categories: An Introduction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 October 2010

Eileen Boris  and
Angélique Janssens
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This 1999 Supplement of the International Review of Social History focuses on complicating central concepts in the understanding of economic and social history: class, gender, race and ethnicity. In concentrating on industrial workers, their politics, and institutions, labor and working-class history had tended to ignore gender, race, and ethnicity as discursive and material forces. It discussed the woman or black or immigrant worker as a subset of worker, assumed to be male, white, and of the dominant national or ethnic group. Only during recent years have historians began to ask how gender, race, and ethnicity as categories of analysis change narratives of class formation and working-class experience. This question has become particularly salient as the European Union and the United States seek to grapple with the human consequences of colonial and imperialist legacies both within and beyond national boundaries in an increasingly global economy.

Type
Introduction
Information
International Review of Social History , Volume 44 , supplement S7: Complicating Categories: Gender, Class, Race and Ethnicity , December 1999 , pp. 1 - 13
Copyright
Copyright © Internationaal Instituut voor Sociale Geschiedenis 1999

References

1. Frader, Laura L. and Rose, Sonya O., “Introduction: Gender and the Reconstruction of European Working-Class History”, in Frader, Laura L. and Rose, Sonya O. (eds), Gender and Class in Modern Europe (Ithaca, NY, 1996), p. 10Google Scholar ; Scott, Joan Wallach, Gender and The Politics of History (New York, 1988), pp. 72Google Scholar , 79. See also Alexander, Sally, “Women, Class, and Sexual Difference”, History Workshop, 17 (1984), p. 131Google Scholar.

2. Roediger, David R., The Wages of Whiteness: Race and the Making of the American Working Class (New York, 1991)Google Scholar ; idem, “‘Labor in White Skin’: Race and Working Class History”, in Roediger, David, Towards the Abolition of Whiteness (London, 1994), p. 25Google Scholar ; idem, “The Crisis in Labor History: Race, Gender and the Replotting of the Working Class Past in the United States”, in Towards the Abolition of Whiteness, pp. 69-81. Similarly, see Hill, Herbert, “The Problem of Race in American Labor History”, Reviews in American History, 24 (1996), pp. 189–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar ; Painter, Nell Irvin, “The New Labor History and the Historical Moment”, International journal of Politics, Culture, and Society, 2 (1989), pp. 369–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

3. Higgenbotham, Evelyn Brooks, “African-American Women's History and the Metalanguage of Race”, Signs: A Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 17 (1992), pp. 251–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar ; Frank, Dana, “White Working-Class Women and the Race Question”, International Labor and Working-Class History, 54 (1998), pp. 80–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

4. For history, Kessler-Harris, Alice, Out to Work: A History of Wage-Earning Women in the United States (New York, 1982)Google Scholar ; Scott, Joan Wallach and Tilly, Louise, Women, Work, and Family (New York, 1978)Google Scholar ; for theory , Barrett, Michele, Women's Oppression Today (London, 1980)Google Scholar ; Sargent, Lydia (ed.), Women and Revolution: A Discussion of the Unhappy Marriage of Marxism and Feminism (Boston, MA, 1981)Google Scholar ; Walby, Sylvia, Theorizing Patriarchy (Oxford, 1990)Google Scholar . For die dual systems critique , , Frader and , Rose, “Introduction”, p. 19Google Scholar.

5. For one summary of old and new directions, Sharpe, Pamela and Bradley, Harriet (eds), Labour History Review, 63 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar , special issue on “Gendering Work: Historical Approaches”.

6. Excellent summaries of the literature are found in Frader and Rose, “Introduction”, and the remaining essays in Gender and Class in Modern Europe, see also Baron, Ava, Work Engendered: Toward a New History of American Labor (Ithaca, NY, 1991)Google Scholar . For the home , Boris, Eileen, “The Home as a Workplace: Deconstructing Dichotomy”, International Review of Social History, 39 (1994), pp. 415–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

7. , Scott, “Gender: A Useful Category of Historical Analysis”, in Gender and the Politics of History, pp. 28–52Google Scholar ; Baron, Ava, “On Looking at Men: Masculinity and the Making of a Gendered Working-Class History”, in Shapiro, Ann-Louise (ed.), Feminists Revision History (New Brunswick, NJ, 1994.). PP. 146–171Google Scholar.

8. Some recent critiques include duCille, Ann, “The Occult of True Black Womanhood: Critical Demeanor and Black Feminist Studies”, Signs: A Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 19 (1994), pp. 591–629CrossRefGoogle Scholar ; Friedman, Susan Stanford, ”Beyond White and Other: Relationality and Narratives of Race in Feminist Discourse“, Signs: A Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 21 (1995), pp. 1–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar ; see also Mohanty, Chandra Talpade, ”Under Western Eyes: Feminist Scholarship and Colonial Discourses“, in Mohanty, Chandra Talpade, Russo, Ann, and Torres, Lourdes (eds), Third World Feminisms and the Politics of Feminism (Bloomington, IN, 1991), pp. 51–80Google Scholar.

9. For example, Palmer, Phyllis, Domesticity and Dirt: Housewives and Domestic Servants in the United States, 1920–1945 (Philadelphia, PA, 1989).Google Scholar

10. Notable examples include Jones, Jacqueline, Labor of Love, Labor of Sorrow: Black Women, Work, and the Family (New York, 1985)Google Scholar ; Hunter, Tera W., To Joy My Freedom: Southern Black Women's Lives After the Civil War (Cambridge, MA, 1997)Google Scholar ; Glenn, Evelyn Nakano, Issei, Nisei, War Bride: Three Generations of Japanese American Women in Domestic Service (Philadelphia, PA, 1986.)Google Scholar ; Ruiz, Vicki L., Cannery Women, Cannery Lives: Mexican Women, Unionization, and the California Food Processing Industry, 1930–1950 (Albuquerque, NM, 1987)Google Scholar ; Tabili, Laura, ‘We Ask British Justice’: Workers and Racial Difference in Late Imperial Britain (Ithaca, NY, 1994)Google Scholar genders black working-class men. Recent work in Australia also has reclaimed the history of Aboriginals. See McGrath, Ann and Saunders, Kay, with Huggins, Jackie, “Aboriginal Workers”, special issue of Labour History, 69 (1995)Google Scholar.

11. For example, the forum on Nelson, Bruce, “Class, Race, and Democracy in the CIO: The ‘New’ Labor History Meets the ‘Wages of Whiteness’”, International Review of Social History, 41 (1996), pp. 351–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar , which dismisses the comments of Elizabeth Faue.

12. Arnesen, Eric, “Up from Exclusion: Black and White Workers, Race, and the State of Labor History”, Reviews in American History, 26 (1998), pp. 146–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

13. Dawley, Alan and Trotter, Joe William Jr, “Race and Class”, Labor History, 35 (1994), p. 486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

14. Barrett, James R. and Roediger, David, “Inbetween Peoples: Race, Nationality and the ‘New Immigrant’ Working Class”, Journal of American Ethnic History, 16 (1997), pp. 3–44Google Scholar ; Jacobson, Mathew Frye, Whiteness of a Different Color (Cambridge, MA, 1998)Google Scholar ; Brodkin, Karen, How Jews Became White Folks and What That Says About Race in America (New Brunswick, NJ, 1998)Google Scholar ; Gutierrez, Raymond, When Jesus Came, the Corn Mothers Went Away: Marriage, Sexuality and Power in New Mexico, 1500–1846 (Stanford, CA, 1991)Google Scholar.

15. , Dawley and , Trotter Jr, ”Race and Class“, p. 492Google Scholar . For examples , Boyle, Kevin, ”The Kiss: Racial and Gender Conflict in a 1950s Automobile Factory“, Journal of American History, 84 1997.) PP. 496–523CrossRefGoogle Scholar ; Boris, Eileen, “You Wouldn't Want One of Em Dancing With Your Wife: Racialized Bodies on the Job in WWII”, American Quarterly, 50 (1998), pp. 77–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

16. Hodes, Martha, ”Introduction: Interconnecting and Diverging Narratives“, in Hodes, Martha (ed.), Sex, Love, Race: Crossing Boundaries in North American History (New York, 1999), p. 1Google Scholar ; see also Pascoe, Peggy, “Miscegenation Law, Court Cases, and Ideologies of ‘Race’ in Twentieth-Century America”, The Journal of American History, 81 (1996), pp. 44–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

17. Liu, Tessie, ”Teaching die Differences Among Women from a Historical Perspective: Rethinking Race and Gender as Social Categories“, Women's Studies International Forum, 14 (1991), p. 271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

18. For one attempt that privileges race, Anthias, Floya and Yuvaly-Davis, Nira with Cain, Harriet, Racialized Boundaries: Race, Nation, Gender, Colour and Class and the Anti-Racist Struggle (London, 1992.).Google Scholar

19. Curthoys, Ann, “The Three Body Problem: Feminism and Chaos Theory”, Hecate, 17 (1991), pp. 14–21.Google Scholar

20. See also Frager, Ruth A., ”Labour History and the Interlocking Hierarchies of Class, Ethnicity, and Gender“, International Review of Social History, 44 (1999), pp. 217–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

21. Clancy-Smith, Julia and Gouda, Frances (eds), Domesticating the Empire: Race, Gender, and Family Life in French and Dutch Colonialism (Charlottesville, VA, 1998)Google Scholar ; Lewis, Earl and Ardizzone, Heidi, “A Modern Cinderella: Race, Sexuality, and Social Class in the Rhinelander Case”, International Labor and Working-Class History, 51 (1997), pp. 129–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

22. For a sample, see Wing, Adrien Katherine, Critical Race Feminism (New York, 1997).Google Scholar

23. Young, Iris Marion, “Gender as Seriality: Thinking about Women as a Social Collective”, Signs: A Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 19 (1994), pp. 713–738CrossRefGoogle Scholar ; Rose, Sonya O., “Class Formation and the Quintessential Worker”, in Hall, John R. (ed.), Reworking Class (Ithaca, NY, 1997.). PP. 133–166Google Scholar.

24. For example, Stoler, Ann Laura, “Carnal Knowledge and Imperial Power: Gender, Race, and Morality in Colonial Asia”, in Leonardo, Micaela di (ed.), Gender At the Crossroads of Knowledge: Feminist Anthropology in the Postmodern Era (Berkeley, CA, 1991), pp. 51–101Google Scholar ; McClintock, Anne, Imperial Leather: Race, Gender and Sexuality in the Colonial Conquest (New York, 1995)Google Scholar ; Boris, Eileen, ‘The Racialized Gendered State: Conceptions of Citizenship in the United States’, Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State and Society, 2 (1995), pp. 160–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

25. Scott, Joan Wallach, Only Paradoxes To Offer: French Feminists and the Rights of Man (Cambridge, MA, 1996), p. 6.Google Scholar

26. Sacks, Karen Brodkin, “Toward a Unified Theory of Class, Race, and Gender”, American Ethnologist, 16 (1989), p. 534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

27. See, for example, “Workers in Racially Stratified Societies”, thematic issue of International Labor and Working-Class History, 51 (1997).Google Scholar

28. See essays in Hall, Reworking Class.