Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T19:22:15.377Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Competing Inequalities: The Struggle Over Reserved Legislative Seats for Women in India*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 October 2010

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Introduction of the Women's Reservation Bill was stalled in Lok Sabha on Monday amid unprecedented scenes of snatching of papers from the Speaker and the law minister and the virtual coming to blows of members […]. As the shell shocked minister stood rooted to the spot, the member tore the papers with relish and flung them in the air provoking members from the treasury benches to storm the well. By this time, the well of the Lok Sabha looked like a veritable battle field with members from both sides preparing for a scuffle as the Speaker adjourned the House for the day.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Internationaal Instituut voor Sociale Geschiedenis 1999

References

1. “RJD–SP Stall Introduction of Women's Quota Bill”, Times of India, 14 07 1998.Google Scholar

2. For a more detailed description of these policies in comparison with other “affirmative action policies”, see Jenkins, Laura D., “Preferential Policies for Disadvantaged Ethnic Groups: Employment and Education”, in Young, Crawford (ed.), Ethnic Diversity and Public Policy: A Comparative Inquiry (London, 1998).Google Scholar

3. Larana, Enrique, Johnston, Hank, and Gusfield, Joseph R., New Social Movements: From Ideology to Identity (Philadelphia, PA, 1994), p. 6.Google Scholar

4. Inglehart, Ronald, Culture Shift in Advanced Industrial Society (Princeton, NJ, 1990).Google Scholar

5. Wald, Kenneth D., Button, James W. and Rienzo, Barbara A., “The Politics of Gay Rights in American Communities: Explaining Antidiscrimination Ordinances and Policies”, American Journal of Political Science, 40 (1996), p. 1169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

6. An example of classic “resource mobilization” scholarship is Craig Jenkins, J., The Politics of Insurgency: The Farm Worker Movement in the 1960s (New York, 1985)Google Scholar . Doug McAdam's “political process” model builds on this tradition. SeeMcAdam, Doug, Political Process and the Development of Black Insurgency 1930–1970 (Chicago, IL, 1982)Google Scholar . Some have called for a bridge between the European and American approaches: Bert Klandermans and Tarrow, Sidney, “Mobilization into Social Movements: Synthesizing European and American Approaches” in Klandermans, Bert, Kriesi, Hanspeter and Tarrow, Sidney (eds), From Structure to Action: Comparing Social Movements Across Cultures (Greenwich, CT, 1988)Google Scholar . Subsequent work creatively engaging in such a synthesis has, nevertheless, tended to remain primarily in one camp, as in Sidney Tarrow's tendency to reduce culture to a “cultural tool chest” exploited by political entrepreneurs : Tarrow, Sidney, Power in Movement: Social Movements, Collective Action and Politics (Cambridge, 1994)Google Scholar.

7. Omvedt, Gail, Reinventing Revolution: New Social Movements and the Socialist Tradition in India (Armonk and London, 1993)Google Scholar . See also Escobar, Arturo and Alvarez, Sonia E. (eds), The Making of Social Movements in Latin America: Identity, Strategy and Democracy (Boulder, CO, 1992)Google Scholar and Stepan, Alfred (ed.), Democratizing Brazil: Problems of Transition and Consolidation (New York, 1989.)Google Scholar

8. Hoskins, Catherine and Rai, Shirin M., “Gender, Class and Representation: India and the European UnionEuropean Journal of Women's Studies, 5 (1998), pp. 345365CrossRefGoogle Scholar . See in particular their discussion of Iris Marian Young's work on “unruly categories“.

9. Kishwar, Madhu, “Who Am I? Living Identities vs. Acquired OnesManushi, 94 (1996), p. 6.Google Scholar

10. Jaquette, Jane S., “Women in Power: from Tokenism to Critical MassForeign Policy, 108 (1997). PP. 1327.Google Scholar

11. O'Hanlon, Rosalind and Washbrook, David, “After Orientalism: Culture, Criticism, and Politics in the Third WorldComparative Studies in Society and History, 34 (1992), p. 154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

12. Shah, A.M., “The Judicial and Sociological View of the Other Backward Classes” in Srinivas, M.N. (ed.), Caste: Its Twentieth Century Avatar (New Delhi, 1996), pp. 174194.Google Scholar

13. Frankel, Francine R., “Middle Classes and Castes in India's Politics: Prospects for Political Accommodation” in Kohli, Ami (ed.), India's Democracy: An Analysis of Changing State-Society Relations (Princeton, NJ, 1988), pp. 225261.Google Scholar

14. For a detailed discussion of these categories and reservation policies for them see Galanter, Marc, Competing Equalities: Law and the Backward Classes in India (Delhi, 1991).Google Scholar

15. Ramusack, Barbara, “Cultural Missionaries, Maternal Imperialists, Feminist Allies: British Women Activists in India, 1865–1945Women's Studies International Forum, 13 (1990), p. 316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

16. Nair, Janaki, Women and Law in Colonial India (New Delhi, 1996), p. 122.Google Scholar

17. Galanter, Competing Equalities; Metcalf, Thomas R., Ideologies of the Raj (Delhi, 1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

18. Pearson, Gail, “Reserved Seats — Women and the Vote in Bombay” in Krishnamurty, J. (ed.), Women in Colonial India: Essays on Survival, Work and the State (Delhi, 1989), p. 205.Google Scholar

19. , Pearson, “Reserved Seats — Women and the Vote” p. 207.Google Scholar

20. Ibid., p. 206. On the relationship between the nationalist and women's movements in India, see also Nair, Women and Law in Colonial India, and Partha Chatterjee, “The Nationalist Resolution of the Women's Question” in Sangari, Kumkum and Vaid, Sudesh (eds), Recasting Women: Essays in Indian Colonial History (New Brunswick, NJ, 1989), pp. 233253.Google Scholar

21. , Pearson, “Reserved Seats — Women and the Vote” p. 208.Google Scholar

22. The proportion of women elected to the central legislature under this plan was only 3.4 per cent; Government of India, Ministry of Education and Social Welfare, Department of Social Welfare, Towards Equality: Report of the Committee on the Status of Women (New Delhi, 1974), p. 356.Google Scholar

23. , Pearson, “Reserved Seats — Women and the Vote” p. 210.Google Scholar

24. Forbes, Geraldine, Women in Modern India (Cambridge, 1996), p. 196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

25. Ibid., pp. 196-203.

26. Anglo-Indians also got a few nominated seats.

27. The Indian Constitution (1950) granted adult suffrage, so women were included in the electorate. Prior to this, the British Southborough Committee had left the issue of women's suffrage up to the provincial legislatures, after which “each of the Indian provincial legislatures voted to make it possible within a short span of time for women to be represented at par with men” writes Kishwar, Madhu, “Women and Politics: Beyond QuotasEconomic and Political Weekly, 26 (1996), pp. 28672874.Google Scholar

28. Kumar, Radha, “From Chipko to Sari: The Contemporary Indian Women's Movement” in Basu, Amrita (ed.), The Challenges of Local Feminisms: Women's Movements in Global Perspective (Boulder, CO, 1995), p. 60.Google Scholar

29. Bumiller, Elisabeth, May You Be the Mother of a Hundred Sons: A Journey Among the Women of India (New York, 1990), p. 126Google Scholar . Another example of the rising UN interest in women's rights during the seventies is the 1979 Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women.

30. , Bumiller, May You Be the Mother of a Hundred Sons, pp. 125127.Google Scholar

31. Government of India, Towards Equality, p. 301.Google Scholar

32. Ibid., p. 355.

33. Ibid., p. 304. Examples in this report of the arguments for legislative reservations include the need for political empowerment of women to precede socio-economic empowerment in the Indian context, the need to compel political panies to shift strategies in candidate selection, and the value of “a body of spokesmen of the women's cause” in legislatures. See pp. 302-303.

34. Ibid., p. 304.

35. Ibid.

36. Ibid., p. 354. This quotation is from Phulrenu Guha's “Political Status: Note of Dissent“.

37. Ibid., p. 357. This quotation is from Lotika Sarkar and Vina Mazumdar's “Political Status: Note of Dissent“.

38. Ibid.

39. Ibid., p. 3.

40. , Kumar, “From Chipko to Sati” p. 63.Google Scholar

41. Singh, Hoshiar, “Constitutional Base for Panchayati Raj in India: The 73rd Amendment Act“, Asian Survey, 34 (1994), pp. 824825CrossRefGoogle Scholar ; Bakshi, P.M.. The Constitution of India: With Selective Comments by P.M. Bakshi (Delhi, 1996), pp. 182183Google Scholar.

42. Author's interview with Margaret Alva, former government minister, 19 December 1996, New Delhi. Alva was appointed to the upper house of Parliament by Indira Gandhi in 1974. She later was appointed by Rajiv Gandhi as head of the women's department within the Ministry of Human Resource Development. She has also served as Minister of State for Youth Affairs, Sports and Women.

43. Author's interview with Margaret Alva, 19 December 1996, New Delhi.

44. Author's interview with Brinda Karat, women's movement leader (AIDWA), CPM (Communist Party-Marxist) political activist, 10 December 1996, New Delhi.

45. The Constitution (Eighty-First Amendment) Bill, 1996. See debates in the Lok Sabha of 13 September 1996, when MP Madhukar Sarpotdar argued as follows: “Would the skies have fallen on the nation if it [the Eighty-First Amendment Bill] had been kept pending or had been referred to a Select or Standing Committee and then, once and for all, a comprehensive Bill in this regard was brought forward? […] It should have been brought after involving every section and after proper deliberations. Today the Scheduled Castes, the Scheduled Tribes have been involved but what about the people from the Other Backward Classes who have not been included in this bill?“

46. Congress MP and former government minister Margaret Alva, quoted in Nath, Meenakshi, ”Cutting Across Party Lines: Women Members of Parliament Explain Their Stand on Reservation QuotasManushi, 96 (1996), p. 11.Google Scholar

47. Author's interview with Brinda Karat, 10 December 1996, New Delhi.

48. Dunn, Dana, “Gender Inequality in Education and Employment in the Scheduled Castes and Tribes of IndiaPopulation Research and Policy Review, 12 (1993), pp. 5370CrossRefGoogle Scholar . Likewise, in spite of policies aimed at the socioeconomic uplift of the scheduled castes and tribes, the women within these groups remain “doubly disadvantaged“: “The multiplicity of social categories in India often serves to obscure the status of women in the most disadvantaged segments of the population” (p. 66).

49. Author's interview with Vimla Farooqui of the National Forum for Indian Women (NFIW), Delhi, 2 December 1996.

50. Author's interview with Brinda Karat, 10 December 1996, New Delhi.

51. Ibid.

52. Wright, Theodore P., “A New Demand for Muslim Reservations in IndiaAsian Survey, 37 (1997), pp. 852858.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

53. Author's interview with Jotsna Chatterjee, women's movement leader and YWCA activist, New Delhi, 22 November 1996, New Delhi.

54. Author's interview with Margaret Alva, 19 December 1996, New Delhi.

55. Author's interview with activists, Miss Gangoli of the YWCA in Delhi, 3 December 1996, and Jotsna Chatterjee, 22 November 1996.

56. Gandhi, Maneka, “And the One Who Differs […] Maneka Gandhi on the Women's Reservation BillManushi, 96 (1996), p. 18.Google Scholar

57. BJP MP Uma Bharati, quoted in Nath, Meenakshi, “Cutting Across Party Lines: Women Members of Parliament Explain Their Stand on Reservation QuotasManushi, 96 (1996), p. 11.Google Scholar

58. Author's interview with Vimla Farooqui, Delhi, 2 December 1996.

59. Author's interview with former prime minister of India, V.P. Singh, New Delhi, 20 November 1996.

60. Dunn, Dana, “Gender Inequality in Education and Employment of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes of IndiaPopulation Research and Policy Review, 12 (1993), pp. 5370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

61. Anderson, Benedict, Imagined Communities (London, 1991).Google Scholar

62. Author's interview with Ram Vilas Paswan, General Secretary of the SC/ST MPs Forum, Minister of Railways, MP from Bihar, Hindu dalit Leader, Delhi, 20 December 1996.

63. Phelan, Shane, “The Space of Justice”, in Nicholson, Linda and Seidman, Steven (eds), Social Postmodernism: Beyond Identity Politics (New York, 1995), pp. 338339.Google Scholar