Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-31T16:35:07.678Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Treatment fidelity and acceptability of a cognition-focused intervention for older adults with mild cognitive impairment (MCI)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2013

Mandy R. Vidovich ,
Nicola T. Lautenschlager ,
Leon Flicker ,
Linda Clare  and
Osvaldo P. Almeida
Mandy R. Vidovich*
Affiliation:
Western Australia Centre for Health and Ageing, CMR, WAIMR, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
Nicola T. Lautenschlager
Affiliation:
Western Australia Centre for Health and Ageing, CMR, WAIMR, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia School of Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia Academic Unit for Psychiatry of Old Age, St Vincent's Health, Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Leon Flicker
Affiliation:
Western Australia Centre for Health and Ageing, CMR, WAIMR, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
Linda Clare
Affiliation:
School of Psychology, Bangor University, Bangor, Gwynedd, UK
Osvaldo P. Almeida
Affiliation:
Western Australia Centre for Health and Ageing, CMR, WAIMR, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia School of Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia Department of Psychiatry, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: Mandy R. Vidovich, WA Centre for Health and Ageing (M573), University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley WA 6009, Perth, Australia. Phone: +61 08 9224 2855; Fax: +61 08 9224 8009. Email: [email protected].
Get access

Abstract

Background: Acceptability and fidelity assessments are an integral part of research, although few published trials comment on these processes in detail.

Methods: We designed a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to identify the benefits of a cognition-focused intervention for older adults with mild cognitive impairment. Participants completed a six-item feedback questionnaire identifying level of satisfaction with their allocated intervention; this formed the acceptability assessment. Audio recordings of all sessions were reviewed and systematically assessed and rated for consistency of delivery (fidelity assessment).

Results: Mean attendance (standard deviation) was 8.1 sessions (2.8) for the cognitive activity (CA) group and 8.4 (2.6) for the control general education group. There were no differences between groups regarding clarity and interest, willingness to attend the program in the community and pay a fee. Both groups reported the interventions to be relevant to their needs; however, this was rated more highly by the CA group (p < 0.01). There was high adherence to delivery of program content across both groups, yielding consistency scores above 95%.

Conclusion: This study illustrates a systematic approach to assess acceptability and fidelity. The results show that the intervention was well received and met the needs of all participants. The manualized structure of the sessions facilitated the systematic implementation and reproducibility of the interventions. Acceptability and fidelity assessments have implications for the validity of assumptions made regarding trial outcomes and should therefore be included as standard process in RCTs.

Keywords

acceptabilityfidelitycognitive activitymild cognitive impairment
Type
Research Article
Information
International Psychogeriatrics , Volume 25 , Issue 5 , May 2013 , pp. 815 - 823
Copyright
Copyright © International Psychogeriatric Association 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bellg, A. J.et al. (2004). Enhancing treatment fidelity in health behavior change studies: best practices and recommendations from the NIH behavior change consortium. Health Psychology, 23, 443–451.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cowan, R. J. and Sheridan, S. M. (2003). Investigating the acceptability of behavioral interventions in applied conjoint behavioral consultation: moving from analog conditions to naturalistic settings. School Psychology Quarterly, 18, 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dane, A. V. and Schneider, B. H. (1998). Program integrity in primary and early secondary prevention: are implementation effects out of control? Clinical Psychology Review, 18, 23–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Finn, C. A. and Sladeczek, I. E. (2001). Assessing the social validity of behavioral interventions: a review of treatment acceptability measures. School Psychology Quarterly, 16, 176–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E. and McHugh, P. R. (1975). “Mini-mental state.” A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal Psychiatric Research, 12, 189–198.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lichstein, K. L., Riedel, B. W. and Grieve, R. (1994). Fair tests of clinical trials: a treatment implementation model. Advances in Behavior Research and Therapy, 16, 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Portet, F.et al. (2006). Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) in medical practice: a critical review of the concept and new diagnostic procedure. Report of the MCI Working Group of the European Consortium on Alzheimer's Disease. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 77, 714–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saunders, J. B., Aasland, O. G., Babor, T. F., de la Fuente, J. R. and Grant, M. (1993). Development of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT): WHO collaborative project on early detection of persons with harmful alcohol consumption. II. Addiction, 88, 791–804.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vidovich, M. R., Lautenschlager, N. T., Flicker, L., Clare, L. and Almeida, O. P. (2009). The PACE study: a randomized clinical trial of cognitive activity (CA) for older adults with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Trials, 10, 1–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
WHO (2007). International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 10th Revision. WHO: Geneva.Google Scholar