Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T12:22:03.577Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A systematic review of the validity and reliability of apathy scales in neurodegenerative conditions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2014

Ratko Radakovic ,
Catherine Harley ,
Sharon Abrahams  and
John M. Starr
Ratko Radakovic*
Affiliation:
Psychology–School of Philosophy, Psychology & Language Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK Anne Rowling Regenerative Neurology Clinic, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK Alzheimer Scotland Dementia Research Centre, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK Euan MacDonald Centre for MND Research, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
Catherine Harley
Affiliation:
Western General Hospital, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
Sharon Abrahams
Affiliation:
Psychology–School of Philosophy, Psychology & Language Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK Anne Rowling Regenerative Neurology Clinic, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK Euan MacDonald Centre for MND Research, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
John M. Starr
Affiliation:
Alzheimer Scotland Dementia Research Centre, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: Ratko Radakovic, Department of Psychology, University of Edinburgh, 7 George Square, Edinburgh EH8 9JZ, UK. Phone: +441316509867. Email: [email protected], [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background:

There are several scales used to detect apathy in disease populations. Since apathy is a prevalent symptom in many neurodegenerative diseases, this is an especially important context in which to identify and compare scales.

Aims:

To provide an overview of apathy scales validated in generic and specific neurodegenerative disease populations, compare validation studies’ methodological quality and the psychometric properties of the validated apathy scales.

Methods:

A systematic review of literature was conducted of articles published between 1980 and 2013. The final articles selected for review were rated on methodological quality and the psychometric properties of the scales used were interpreted.

Results:

Sixteen articles validating apathy scales were included in the review, five in a generic neurodegenerative sample and eleven in specific neurodegenerative samples. The methodological quality of specific studies varied from poor to excellent. The highest quality, which had psychometrically favorable scales, were the dementia apathy interview and rating (DAIR) and the apathy evaluation scale-clinical version (AES-C) in Alzheimer's disease and the Lille apathy rating scale (LARS) in Parkinson's disease. Generic neurodegenerative disease validation studies were of average methodological quality and yielded inconsistent psychometric properties.

Conclusions:

Several instruments can be recommended for use in some specific neurodegenerative diseases. Other instruments should either be validated or developed to assess apathy in more generic populations.

Keywords

apathyrating scalespsychogeriatricsdementiamotor disorders
Type
Review Article
Information
International Psychogeriatrics , Volume 27 , Issue 6 , June 2015 , pp. 903 - 923
Copyright
Copyright © International Psychogeriatric Association 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abrahams, S. (2011). Social cognition in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Neurodegenerative Disease Management, 1, 397–405.Google Scholar
Chase, T. N. (2011). Apathy in neuropsychiatric disease: diagnosis, pathophysiology and treatment. Neurotoxicity Research, 19, 266–278.Google Scholar
Clarke, D. et al. (2007). Apathy in dementia: an examination of the psychometric properties of the apathy evaluation scale. The Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 19, 57–64.Google Scholar
Clarke, D. et al. (2008). Apathy in dementia: clinical and sociodemographic correlates. The Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 20, 337–347.Google Scholar
Clarke, D. E. et al. (2011). Are the available apathy measures reliable and valid? A review of the psychometric evidence. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 70, 73–97.Google Scholar
Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297–334.Google Scholar
Cummings, J. L. et al. (1994). The Neuropsychiatric Inventory comprehensive assessment of psychopathology in dementia. Neurology, 44, 2308–2308.Google Scholar
de Medeiros, et al. (2010). The Neuropsychiatric Inventory-Clinician rating scale (NPI-C): reliability and validity of a revised assessment of neuropsychiatric symptoms in dementia. International Psychogeriatrics, 22, 984–994.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dujardin, K., Sockeel, P., Delliaux, M., Destée, A. and Defebvre, L. (2008). The lille apathy rating scale: validation of a caregiver-based version. Movement Disorders, 23, 845–849.Google Scholar
Dujardin, K., Sockeel, P., Delliaux, M., Destée, A. and Defebvre, L. (2009). Apathy may herald cognitive decline and dementia in Parkinson's disease. Movement Disorders, 24, 2391–2397.Google Scholar
Dujardin, K. et al. (2007). Characteristics of apathy in Parkinson's disease. Movement Disorders, 22, 778–784.Google Scholar
George, D. and Mallery, P. (2003). SPSS for Windows Step by Step: A Simple Guide and Reference. 11.0 Update, 4th edn, Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
Girardi, A., MacPherson, S. E. and Abrahams, S. (2011). Deficits in emotional and social cognition in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Neuropsychology, 25, 53–65.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Y. K., Eastwood, J. D., LaGuardia, J. and Danckert, J. (2011). Boredom: an emotional experience distinct from apathy, anhedonia, or depression. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 30, 647–666.Google Scholar
Goldstein, L. H. and Abrahams, S. (2013). Changes in cognition and behavior in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: nature of impairment and implications for assessment. The Lancet Neurology, 12, 368–380.Google Scholar
Grossman, A. B., Woolley­Levine, S., Bradley, W. G. and Miller, R. G. (2007). Detecting neurobehavioral changes in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, 8, 56–61.Google Scholar
Hamilton, J. M. et al. (2003). Behavioral abnormalities contribute to functional decline in Huntington's disease. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 74, 120–122.Google Scholar
Hermans, H., van der Pas, F. H. and Evenhuis, H. M. (2011). Instruments assessing anxiety in adults with intellectual disabilities: a systematic review. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 32, 861–870.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hsieh, C. J., Chu, H., Cheng, J. J. S., Shen, W. W. and Lin, C. C. (2012). Validation of apathy evaluation scale and assessment of severity of apathy in Alzheimer's disease. Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 66, 227–234.Google Scholar
Jonsson, M. et al. (2010). Apathy is a prominent neuropsychiatric feature of radiological white-matter changes in patients with dementia. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 25, 588–595.Google Scholar
Kaufer, D. I. et al. (2000). Validation of the NPI-Q, a brief clinical form of the neuropsychiatric inventory. The Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 12, 233–239.Google Scholar
Kimberlin, C. L. and Winetrstein, A. G. (2008). Validity and reliability of measurement instruments used in research. American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, 65, 2276–2284.Google Scholar
Landes, A. M., Sperry, S. D. and Strauss, M. E. (2005). Prevalence of apathy, dysphoria, and depression in relation to dementia severity in Alzheimer's disease. The Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, 17, 342–349.Google Scholar
Leontjevas, R. et al. (2012). A comparative validation of the abbreviated apathy evaluation scale (AES-10) with the neuropsychiatric inventory apathy subscale against diagnostic criteria of apathy. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 13, e301–e306.Google Scholar
Levy, M. L. et al. (1998). Apathy is not depression. The Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 10, 314–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lieberman, A. (2006). Depression in Parkinson's disease – a review. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica, 113, 1–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lueken, U. et al. (2007). Development of a short version of the apathy evaluation scale specifically adapted for demented nursing home residents. The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 15, 376–385.Google Scholar
Malakouti, S. K., Panaghi, L., Foroughan, M., Salehi, M. and Zandi, T. (2012). Farsi version of the neuropsychiatric inventory: validity and reliability study among Iranian elderly with dementia. International Psychogeriatrics, 24, 223–230.Google Scholar
Marin, R. S. (1996). Apathy: concept, syndrome, neural mechanisms, and treatment. Seminars in Clinical Neuropsychiatry, 1, 304–314.Google Scholar
Marin, R. S., Biedrzycki, R. C. and Firinciogullari, S. (1991). Reliability and validity of the apathy evaluation scale. Psychiatry Research, 38, 143–162.Google Scholar
Mendez, M. F., Lauterbach, E. C. and Sampson, S. M. (2008). ANPA committee on research. An evidence-based review of the psychopathology of frontotemporal dementia: a report of the ANPA committee on research. The Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, 20, 130–149.Google Scholar
Mioshi, E., Kipps, C. M. and Hodges, J. R. (2009). Activities of daily living in behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia: differences in caregiver and performance-based assessments. Alzheimer Disease and Associated Disorders, 23, 70–76.Google Scholar
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J. and Altman, D. G. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Annals of Internal Medicine, 151, 264–269.Google Scholar
Pedersen, K. F. et al. (2012). Psychometric properties of the starkstein apathy scale in patients with early untreated Parkinson disease. The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 20, 142–148.Google Scholar
Pedersen, K. F., Larsen, J. P., Alves, G. and Aarsland, D. (2009). Prevalence and clinical correlates of apathy in Parkinson's disease: a community-based study. Parkinsonism and Related Disorders, 15, 295–299.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Politis, A. M., Mayer, L. S., Passa, M., Maillis, A. and Lyketsos, C. G. (2004). Validity and reliability of the newly translated hellenic neuropsychiatric inventory (H- NPI) applied to greek outpatients with Alzheimer's disease: a study of disturbing behaviors among referrals to a memory clinic. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 19, 203–208.Google Scholar
Quaranta, D., Marra, C., Rossi, C., Gainotti, G. and Masullo, C. (2012). Different apathy profile in behavioral variant of frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer's disease: a preliminary investigation. Current Gerontology and Geriatrics Research, Current Gerontology and Geriatrics Research. Epublished ahead of print, doi:10.1155/2012/719250.Google Scholar
Robert, P. H. et al. (2002). The apathy inventory: assessment of apathy and awareness in Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease and mild cognitive impairment. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 17, 1099–1105.Google Scholar
Sockeel, P. et al. (2006). The lille apathy rating scale (LARS), a new instrument for detecting and quantifying apathy: validation in Parkinson's disease. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 77, 579–584.Google Scholar
Staekenborg, S. S. et al. (2010). Behavioral and psychological symptoms in vascular dementia; differences between small-and large-vessel disease. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 81, 547–551.Google Scholar
Starkstein, S. E. et al. (1992). Reliability, validity, and clinical correlates of apathy in Parkinson's disease. The Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, 4, 134–139.Google Scholar
Strauss, M. E. and Sperry, S. D. (2002). An informant-based assessment of apathy in Alzheimer disease. Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology, 15, 176–183.Google Scholar
Thompson, J. C. et al. (2012). Longitudinal evaluation of neuropsychiatric symptoms in Huntington's disease. The Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 24, 53–60.Google Scholar
van Duijn, E., Kingma, E. M. and van der Mast, R. C. (2007). Psychopathology in verified Huntington's disease gene carriers. The Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 19, 441–448.Google Scholar
van Duijn, E., Reedeker, N., Giltay, E. J., Roos, R. A. C. and van der Mast, R. C. (2010). Correlates of apathy in Huntington's disease. The Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 22, 287–294.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van Reekum, R., Stuss, D. T. and Ostrander, L. (2005). Apathy: why care? The Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 17, 7–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Viera, A. J. and Garrett, J. M. (2005). Understanding interobserver agreement: the kappa statistic. Family Medicine, 37, 360–363.Google Scholar
Whiting, P., Rutjes, A. W., Reitsma, J. B., Bossuyt, P. M. and Kleijnen, J. (2003). The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 3, 25.Google Scholar
Witgert, M. et al. (2010). Frontal-lobe mediated behavioral dysfunction in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. European Journal of Neurology, 17, 103–110.Google Scholar
Woolley, S. C., Zhang, Y., Schuff, N., Weiner, M. W. and Katz, J. S. (2011). Neuroanatomical correlates of apathy in ALS using 4 Tesla diffusion tensor MRI. Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, 12, 52–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zahodne, L. B. et al. (2009). Examination of the lille apathy rating scale in Parkinson disease. Movement Disorders, 24, 677–683.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Radakovic Supplementary Material

Figure S1

Download Radakovic Supplementary Material(File)
File 56.8 KB
Supplementary material: File

Radakovic Supplementary Material

Figure S2

Download Radakovic Supplementary Material(File)
File 110.1 KB
Supplementary material: File

Radakovic Supplementary Material

Table S1

Download Radakovic Supplementary Material(File)
File 68.2 KB