Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-21T13:04:14.806Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Spirituality, social support, and flexibility among older adults: a five-year longitudinal study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 January 2018

Nathalie Bailly ,
Guillaume Martinent ,
Claude Ferrand ,
Océane Agli ,
Caroline Giraudeau ,
Kamel Gana  and
Nicolas Roussiau
Nathalie Bailly*
Affiliation:
EA 2114, Psychologie des Ages de la Vie et Adaptation, University of Tours, Tours, France
Guillaume Martinent
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Vulnerability and Innovations in Sport, EA 7428, University of Claude Bernard Lyon I – Univ Lyon, Lyon, France
Claude Ferrand
Affiliation:
EA 2114, Psychologie des Ages de la Vie et Adaptation, University of Tours, Tours, France
Océane Agli
Affiliation:
EA 2114, Psychologie des Ages de la Vie et Adaptation, University of Tours, Tours, France
Caroline Giraudeau
Affiliation:
EA 2114, Psychologie des Ages de la Vie et Adaptation, University of Tours, Tours, France
Kamel Gana
Affiliation:
EA 4139, Santé et Qualité de Vie, University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
Nicolas Roussiau
Affiliation:
Laboratory LPPL, University of Nantes, Nantes, France
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: Nathalie Bailly, Department of Psychology, EA 2114, Psychologie des Ages de la Vie, 3 Rue des Tanneurs, 30041 Tours Cedex 01, France. Phone: +33 2 47 36 65 56. Email: [email protected].
Get access

Abstract

Objectives:

The objectives of the study were to examine the trajectory of spirituality among older adults, to investigate the roles of gender and religion on the developmental trajectory of spirituality, and to explore whether the linear growth of spirituality accelerated or decelerated at time points at which the participants reported high scores of social support and flexibility.

Design:

A five-year longitudinal study.

Setting:

The research used data from a longitudinal study, which follows a non-institutionalized older adults cohort of residents from France. The data used in this paper were collected at three time points (T1: 2007; T2: 2009; T3: 2012).

Participants:

A total of 567 participants were included in the analysis (59.44% female; Mage = 75.90, SD = 5.12).

Measurements:

Multilevel growth curve analysis was used measuring spirituality, satisfaction with social support, and flexibility.

Results:

The results indicated the following: (1) stability of spirituality over time, (2) older women reported higher levels of spirituality than older men, and those who had a religion reported higher scores of spirituality than their counterparts who had no religion (these effects were strong and clinically meaningful), (3) older adults who reported higher levels of social support and flexibility also reported higher levels of spirituality, and (4) the slope of spirituality seemed to accelerate at time points at which participants also had higher levels of social support and flexibility (these effects were rather small but of theoretical interest).

Conclusion:

The results of the present study help to improve the understanding of the potential benefit of encouraging the spiritual aspects of life.

Keywords

aginglongitudinal studiesspiritualityreligion
Type
Original Research Article
Information
International Psychogeriatrics , Volume 30 , Issue 12: Issue Theme: Positive Psychiatry , December 2018 , pp. 1745 - 1752
Copyright
Copyright © International Psychogeriatric Association 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alaphilippe, D., Bailly, N., Gana, K. and Martin, B. (2005). Les prédicteurs de l'adaptation chez l'adulte âgé. L'Année Psychologique, 105, 649–667. doi:10.3406/psy.2005.30496.Google Scholar
Ali, J., Marhemat, F., Sara, J. and Hamid, H. (2015). The relationship between spiritual well-being and quality of life among elderly people. Holistic Nursing Practice, 29, 128–135. doi:10.1097/HNP.0000000000000081.Google Scholar
Bailly, N., Gana, K., Hervé, C., Joulain, M. and Alaphilippe, D. (2014). Does flexible goal adjustment predict life satisfaction in older adults? A six-year longitudinal study. Aging & Mental Health, 18, 662–670. doi:10.1080/13607863.2013.875121.Google Scholar
Bailly, N. and Roussiau, N. (2010). The Daily Spiritual Experience Scale (DSES): validation of the short form in an elderly French population. Canadian Journal on Aging, 29, 223–231. doi:10.1017/S0714980810000152.Google Scholar
Ballew, S. H., Hannum, S. M., Gaines, J. M., Marx, K. A. and Parrish, J. M. (2012). The role of spiritual experiences and activities in the relationship between chronic illness and psychological well-being. Journal of Religion and Health, 51, 1386–1396. doi:10.1007/s10943-011-9498-0.Google Scholar
Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B. and Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67, 1–48. doi:10.18637/jss.v067.i01Google Scholar
Benyamini, Y., Idler, E. L., Leventhal, H. and Leventhal, E. A. (2000). Positive affect and function as influences on self-assessments of health: expanding our view beyond illness and disability. The Journals of Gerontology. Series B, Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 55, 107–116.Google Scholar
Brandtstädter, J. and Renner, G. (1990). Tenacious goal pursuit and flexible goal adjustment: explication and age-related analysis of assimilative and accommodative strategies of coping. Psychology and Aging, 5, 58–67. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.5.1.58.Google Scholar
Brandtstädter, J. and Rothermund, K. (2002). The life-course dynamics of goal pursuit and goal adjustment: a two-process framework. Developmental Review, 22, 117–150. doi:10.1006/drev.2001.0539.Google Scholar
Brandtstädter, J., Rothermund, K., Kranz, D. and Kühn, W. (2010). Final decentrations: personal goals, rationality perspectives, and the awareness of life's finitude. European Psychologist, 15, 152–163. doi:10.1027/1016-9040/a000019.Google Scholar
Brown, I. T., Chen, T., Gehlert, N. C. and Piedmont, R. L. (2013). Age and gender effects on the Assessment of Spirituality and Religious Sentiments (ASPIRES) scale: a cross-sectional analysis. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 5, 90–98. doi:10.1037/a0030137.Google Scholar
Bryant, A. N. (2007). Gender differences in spiritual development during the college years. Sex Roles, 56, 835–846. doi:10.1007/s11199-007-9240-2.Google Scholar
Carstensen, L. L., Fung, H. H. and Charles, S. T. (2003). Socioemotional selectivity theory and the regulation of emotion in the second half of life. Motivation and Emotion, 27, 103–123. doi:10.1023/A:1024569803230.Google Scholar
Cohen, S., Underwood, L. and Gottlieb, B. (eds.) (2000). Social Support Measurement and Interventions: A Guide for Health and Social Scientists. New York: Oxford.Google Scholar
Dalby, P. (2006). Is there a process of spiritual change or development associated with ageing? A critical review of research. Aging & Mental Health, 10, 4–12. doi:10.1080/13607860500307969.Google Scholar
Dillon, M., Wink, P. and Fay, K. (2003). Is spirituality detrimental to generativity? Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 42, 427–442. doi:10.1111/1468-5906.00192.Google Scholar
Erikson, E. H. (1987). The human life cycle. In Schlein, S. (ed.), A Way of Looking at Things: Selected Papers from 1930 to 1980 by Erik H. Erikson. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Goldshmidt, O. T. and Weller, L. (2000). ‘Talking emotions’: gender differences in a variety of conversational contexts. Symbolic Interaction, 23, 117–134.doi:10.1525/si.2000.23.2.117.Google Scholar
Hill, P. C. and Pargament, K. I. (2008). Advances in the conceptualization and measurement of religion and spirituality: implications for physical and mental health research. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, S, 3–17. doi:10.1037/1941-1022.S.1.3.Google Scholar
INSEE (2005). Les personnes âgées. Paris, France: INSEE.Google Scholar
Koenig, H. G., McCullough, M. E. and Larson, D. B. (2001). Handbook of Religion and Health. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Koenig, H. G., Westlund, R. E., George, L. K., Hughes, D. C., Blazer, D. G. and Hybels, C. (1993). Abbreviating the duke social support index for use in chronically ill elderly individuals. Psychosomatics, 34, 61–69. doi:10.1016/S0033-3182(93)71928-3.Google Scholar
Maselko, J. and Kubzansky, L. D. (2006). Gender differences in religious practices, spiritual experiences and health: results from the US general social survey. Social Science & Medicine (1982), 62, 2848–2860. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.11.008.Google Scholar
Moberg, D. O. (ed.) (2001). Aging and Spirituality. New York: Haworth.Google Scholar
Seeman, T. E. (2000). Health promoting effects of friends and family on health outcomes in older adults. American Journal of Health promotion, 14, 362–370.Google Scholar
Singer, J. D. and Willett, J. B. (2003). Applied Longitudinal Data Analysis: Methods for Studying Change and Event Occurrence. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tomás, J. M., Sancho, P., Galiana, L. and Oliver, A. (2016). A double test on the importance of spirituality, the ‘forgotten factor’, in successful aging. Social Indicators Research, 127, 1377–1389. doi: 10.1007/s11205-015-1014-6.Google Scholar
Tornstam, L. (2005). Gerotranscendence: A Developmental Theory of Positive Aging. New York, NY: Springer Publishing Company, Inc.Google Scholar
Underwood, G. and Teresi, J. A. (2002). The daily spiritual experience scale: development, theoretical description, reliability, exploratory factor analysis, and preliminary construct validity using health-related data. Annual Behavioral Medicine, 24, 22–33.Google Scholar
Wink, P. and Dillon, M. (2002). Spiritual development across the adult life course: findings from a longitudinal study. Journal of Adult Development, 9, 79–94. doi:10.1023/A:1013833419122.Google Scholar
Zimmer, Z., Jagger, C., Chiu, C.-T., Ofstedal, M. B., Rojo, F. and Saito, Y. (2016). Spirituality, religiosity, aging and health in global perspective: a review. SSM – Population Health, 2, 373–381. doi:10.1016/j.ssmph.2016.04.009.Google Scholar