Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T19:31:18.107Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Screening for Dementia: A Preliminary Study on the Validity of the Chinese Version of the Blessed-Roth Dementia Scale

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 January 2005

Linda C. W. Lam
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry at the Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, Hong Kong
Helen F. K. Chiu
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry at the Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, Hong Kong
S. W. Li
Affiliation:
Castle Peak Hospital, Tuen Mun, New Territories, Hong Kong
W. F. Chan
Affiliation:
Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital, Chai Wan, Hong Kong.
Calais K. Y. Chan
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry at the Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, Hong Kong
Mary Wong
Affiliation:
Castle Peak Hospital, Tuen Mun, New Territories, Hong Kong
K. O. Ng
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry at the Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, Hong Kong
Get access

Abstract

Blessed-Roth Dementia Scale has been one of the most widely used rating scales in dementia. Previous studies indicated that this behavioral assessment scale is a useful tool for differentiating elderly subjects with no or minimal intellectual decline from those with cognitive deterioration. In the present study, the authors examined the validity of the Chinese version of the Blessed-Roth Dementia Scale (CDS) in Hong Kong. A total of 106 Chinese subjects were recruited from a social center, an old-age home,and psychogeriatric outpatient clinics. At a cutoff score of 3 of 4, the CDS achieved a sensitivity of 90.5% and specificity of 98.1% in differentiating demented from healthy control subjects. In the Chinese population studied, the scale was readily acceptable and considered to be an useful adjunct in screening of dementia.

Type
Studies on Dementia
Copyright
© 1997 International Psychogeriatric Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)