Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T18:55:30.053Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A randomized controlled trial of a specific reminiscence approach to promote the well-being of nursing home residents with dementia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2004

Claudia K. Y. Lai
Affiliation:
School of Nursing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, SAR, China
Iris Chi
Affiliation:
Sao Pao Centre on Ageing, University of Hong Kong, SAR, China
Jeanie Kayser-Jones
Affiliation:
John A Hartford Center of Geriatric Nursing, University of California, San Francisco U.S.A.
Get access

Abstract

Background: To date, no firm conclusions can be reached regarding the effectiveness of reminiscence for dementia. Researchers have emphasized that there is an urgent need for more systematic research in the area.

Objective and Method: A single-blinded, parallel-groups (one intervention, one comparison, and one no-intervention group) randomized controlled trial (RCT) was adopted to investigate whether a specific reminiscence program leads to higher levels of psychosocial well-being in nursing home residents with dementia. The intervention adopted a life-story approach, while the comparison group provided friendly discussions to control for any changes in outcome as a result of social contacts and attention. The Social Engagement Scale (SES) and Well-being/Ill-being Scale (WIB) were the outcome measures used. The outcomes of the groups were examined with reference to the baseline (T0), immediately (T1), and six weeks (T2) after intervention. The final sample had 101 subjects (control group: n=30; comparison group: n=35; intervention group: n=36). Using multivariate analysis with repeated measures, no significant differences in outcome were found between groups at either T1 or T2. Wilcoxon signed rank tests were performed for each group comparing outcomes between T1 and T0, T2 and T1, and T2 and T0. Significant differences were observed in the intervention group when comparing T1 and T0 WIB (p=.014), but not for the other groups.

Conclusion: Although the intervention did not lead to significant differences between the three groups over time, there was a significant improvement in psychosocial well-being for the intervention group.

Type
2003 IPA RESEARCH AWARDS SECOND-PRIZE WINNER
Copyright
© International Psychogeriatric Association 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)