Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T18:55:54.216Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Psychometric evaluation of the Italian version of the AADS questionnaire: a caregiver-rated tool for the assessment of behavioral deficits and excesses in persons with intellectual disabilities and dementia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 March 2011

Luc P. De Vreese ,
Ulrico Mantesso ,
Elisa De Bastiani ,
Annachiara Marangoni  and
Tiziano Gomiero
Luc P. De Vreese
Affiliation:
Department of Primary Care, Psychogeriatric Service, Local Health District of Modena, Italy
Ulrico Mantesso
Affiliation:
ANFFAS Trentino Onlus, Trento, Italy
Elisa De Bastiani
Affiliation:
ANFFAS Trentino Onlus, Trento, Italy
Annachiara Marangoni
Affiliation:
ANFFAS Trentino Onlus, Trento, Italy
Tiziano Gomiero*
Affiliation:
ANFFAS Trentino Onlus, Trento, Italy
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: Tiziano Gomiero, ANFFAS Trentino Onlus, Via G.B. Trener, 8, 38121, Trento, Italy. Phone: +39–0461-407511; Fax: +39-0461-407500. Email: [email protected].
Get access

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to verify the reliability and validity of the Italian version of the Assessment for Adults with Developmental Disabilities (AADS-I), the only available measure specifically designed to assess the frequency, management difficulties and impact on the quality of life (QoL) of positive and negative non-cognitive symptoms in persons with intellectual disabilities (ID) and dementia.

Methods: AADS-I was administered to professional carers of 63 aging ID individuals. We computed the internal consistency separately of the frequency, management difficulty and effect on the QoL subscales of Behavioral Excesses and Behavioral Deficits and their inter-rater and test-retest reliabilities.

Results: Homogeneity of AADS-I was found to range from good to excellent: Cronbach's α coefficients were 0.77, 0.83 and 0.82, respectively for frequency, management difficulty and effect on the QoL of Behavioral Excesses, and 0.82, 0.76 and 0.79 of Behavioral Deficits. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) between two independent carers were 0.67, 0.79 and 0.73 and 0.67, 0.67 and 0.67 for frequency, management difficulty and effect on the QoL of Behavioral Excesses and Deficits, respectively. Corresponding ICC for test-retest reliability were 0.80, 0.75, 0.78 and 0.70, 0.81, 0.81. Age, gender and typology of ID did not correlate with the AADS-I subscale scores, whereas the severity of ID related only with the frequency subscale of Behavioral Deficits. This subscale also correlated with the Dementia Questionnaire for Persons with Intellectual Disabilities. Behavioral deficits are more frequent in subjects with dementia.

Conclusions: These results confirm the reliability and validity of the Italian version of AADS.

Keywords

assessmentdementiaBPSDintellectual disabilityvalidation
Type
Research Article
Information
International Psychogeriatrics , Volume 23 , Issue 7 , September 2011 , pp. 1124 - 1132
Creative Commons
This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States.
Copyright
Copyright © International Psychogeriatric Association 2011. This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aman, M. G. and Singh, N. N. (1994). Aberrant Behavior Checklist: Supplementary Manual. East Aurora, NY: Slosson.Google Scholar
American Psychiatric Association (2000). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders -Text Revised. (4th edn). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
Aylward, E. H., Burt, D. B., Thorpe, L. U., Lai, F., and Dalton, A. J. (1997). Diagnosis of dementia in individuals with intellectual disability. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 41, 152–164.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Camozzato, A. L. et al. (2008). Reliability of the Brazilian Portuguese version of the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) for patients with Alzheimer's disease and their caregivers. International Psychogeriatrics, 20, 383–393.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Devanand, D. P. (1997). Use of the Columbia University scale to assess psychopathology in Alzheimer's disease. International Psychogeriatrics, 9, 137–142.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Vreese, L. P., Mantesso, U., Scarazzini, M., Menegatti, C. and Gomiero, T. (2007). Uno studio di attendibilità della versione italiana della scala Dementia Questionnaire for Persons with Intellectual Disabilities (DMR). [A reliability study of the Italian version of the Dementia Questionnaire for Persons with Intellectual Disabilities (DMR)]. Psicogeriatria, 3, 19–27.Google Scholar
Emerson, E. (2001). Challenging Behaviour: Analysis and Intervention in People with Severe Intellectual Disabilities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evenhuis, H. M., Kengren, M. M. F. and Eurlings, H. A. L. (2004). Dementia Questionnaire for Persons with Intellectual Disabilities (DMR). Manual. Second edition. Zwammerdam: De Bruggen Centre for People with Intellectual Disabilities.Google Scholar
Finkel, S. I. and Burns, A. (2000). Introduction. Special issue on behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD): a clinical and research update. International Psychogeriatrics, 12 (Suppl 1), 9–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huxley, A., Van-Schalk, P. and Witts, P. (2005). A comparison of challenging behavior in an adult group with Down's syndrome and dementia compared with an adult Down's syndrome group without dementia. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 188–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jozsvai, E. (2005). Behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia in individuals with Down syndrome. Journal of Developmental Disability, 12, 31–40.Google Scholar
Kalsy, S., McQuillan, S., Oliver, C., Hall, S. and Oyebode, J. (2002). The Adults with Down's Syndrome Project: The Assessment of Adults with Developmental Disabilities (AADS) Questionnaire. Birmingham: University of Birmingham and South Birmingham Primary Care NHS Trust.Google Scholar
McCallion, P., McCarron, M. and Force, T. L. (2005). A measure of subjective burden for dementia care: the Caregiving Difficulty Scale – Intellectual Disability. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 49, 365–371.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Millichap, D., Oliver, C., McQuillan, S., Kalsy, S., Lloyd, V. and Hall, S. (2003). Descriptive functional analysis of behavioural excesses shown by adults with Down syndrome and dementia. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 18, 844–854.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moss, S. and Patel, P. (1997). Dementia in older people with intellectual disability: symptoms of physical and mental illness and levels of adaptive behaviour. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 41, 60–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Novella, J. L. et al. (2001). Agreement between patients’ and proxies’ reports of quality of life in Alzheimer's disease. Quality of Life Research, 10, 443–452.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rabins, P. V. and Black, B. S. (2007). Measuring quality of life in dementia: purposes, goals, challenges and progress. International Psychogeriatrics, 19, 401–407.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reisberg, B. (1988). Functional Assessment Staging (FAST). Psychopharmacology Bulletin, 24, 653–659.Google ScholarPubMed
Reisberg, B., Ferris, S. H., de Leon, M. J. and Crook, T. (1982). The Global Deterioration Scale for assessment of primary degenerative dementia. American Journal of Psychiatry, 139, 1136–1139.Google ScholarPubMed
Reiss, S. (1994). Handbook of Challenging Behavior: Mental Health Aspects of Mental Retardation. Worthington, OH: IDS.Google Scholar
Selbæk, G., Kirkevold, Ø., Sommer, O. H. and Engedal, K. (2008). The reliability and validity of the Norwegian version of the Neuropsychiatric Inventory, Nursing Home Version (NPI-NH). International Psychogeriatrics, 20, 375–382.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sinha, D. et al. (1992). A new scale for assessing behavioral agitation in dementia. Psychiatry Research, 40, 311–321.Google Scholar
Streiner, D. L. and Norman, G. R. (1995). Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use. Oxford: Oxford Medical Publications.Google Scholar
Strydom, A. et al. (2009). Report on the State of Science on Dementia in People with Intellectual Disabilities. Canterbury, IASSID Special Interest Research Group on Ageing and Intellectual Disabilities.Google Scholar
Urv, T. K., Zigman, W. B. and Silverman, W. (2008). Maladaptive behaviors related to dementia status in adults with Down syndrome. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 113, 73–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Urv, T. K., Zigman, W. B. and Silverman, W. (2010). Psychiatric symptoms in adults with Down syndrome and Alzheimer's disease. American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 115, 256–276.Google ScholarPubMed
Zigman, W. B. et al. (2004). Incidence and prevalence of dementia in elderly adults with mental retardation without Down syndrome. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 109, 126–141.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed