Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T02:34:57.943Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

P45: Feasibility evaluation an eHealth intervention to support holistic assessment and decision making for people with dementia in care homes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 November 2024

Juliet Gillam
Affiliation:
Cicely Saunders Institute, King’s College London, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, London, UK
Clare Ellis-Smith
Affiliation:
Cicely Saunders Institute, King’s College London, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, London, UK
Jame Ross
Affiliation:
Wolfson Institute of Population Health, University College London, London, UK
Nathan Davies
Affiliation:
Centre for Ageing Population Studies, Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom
Catherine Evans
Affiliation:
Cicely Saunders Institute, King’s College London, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, London, UK Brighton General Hospital, Sussex Community NHS Foundation Trust, Brighton, UK
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Background: Most individuals with dementia in the UK die in care homes. 70% of these are residential, relying on external healthcare professionals to manage the complex needs. eHealth can help facilitate the delivery of holistic care in care homes, yet adoption has traditionally been faced with resistance. Innovative approaches employing Methods from implementation science are required to promote the uptake of eHealth in care homes.

Aim: To evaluate the feasibility of a theoretically-informed co-designed implementation plan for an eHealth intervention to support holistic assessment and decision making for people with dementia in care homes and their family carers, and to identify opportunities to strengthen it.

Methods: An embedded mixed-Methods study conducted in two residential care homes. Qualitative data comprised non-participant observations of the intervention in use, focus groups and semi-structured interviews with care home staff. Data was analysed using a codebook thematic analysis underpinned by the Normalistion Process Theory. Quantitative data included app usage data and two implementation measures, analysed using descriptive statistics. Patient and public involvement informed development and conduct of the study.

Results: 20 care home staff across two care homes used the intervention with 26 residents. Whilst there was some evidence of adoption, reach within the care home and feasibility of its implementation, usage data indicated that the intervention was largely not utilised as intended. Whilst there was sufficient coherence around the intervention, staff faced barriers related to collective action including workload and incompatibility with practice. Reflexive monitoring was therefore low as individuals could not appraise its impact, which compromised staff cognitive participation. Revisions to the plan related to strategies to provide further staff support, including encouraging family involvement and a more tailored approach to training.

Conclusions: Evaluating feasibility of the implementation plan of the intervention was a vital step in its development. Rapid evaluation and iterative response to barriers to use informed learning and allowed for real- time adjustments to implementation strategies, and a set of updated recommendations for use. Further collaboration on the revised strategies with people living with dementia and their family carers is required.

Type
Poster Session 1
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of International Psychogeriatric Association