Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T04:01:18.253Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Natural disaster, older adults, and mental health–a dangerous combination

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 December 2015

Meaghan L. O'donnell
Affiliation:
Phoenix Australia: Centre for Posttraumatic Mental Health, Melbourne, Australia Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia Email: [email protected]
David Forbes
Affiliation:
Phoenix Australia: Centre for Posttraumatic Mental Health, Melbourne, Australia Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia Email: [email protected]

Extract

Natural disasters by their very nature occur suddenly and have the potential to cause great harm at an individual, family, community, and societal level. They occur frequently, and with the escalation in extreme events related to climate change, the frequency, and severity of natural disasters will only increase (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), 2014). Globally, a growing number of people are being exposed to natural disaster; however, the vulnerability to exposure is not equally shared. Those who are socially, physically, economically, culturally, politically, institutionally, or otherwise disadvantaged are especially vulnerable to experiencing natural disaster.

Type
Commentary paper of the month
Copyright
Copyright © International Psychogeriatric Association 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Forbes, D., Creamer, M. and Wade, D. (2012). Psychological support and recovery in the aftermath of natural disaster. International Psychiatry, 9, 1517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inter-Agency Standing Committee (IASC) (2007). Guidelines on Mental Health and Psychosocial Support in Emergency Settings. Geneva, Switzerland.Google Scholar
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [IPCC] (2014). Summary for policymakers. In Field, C. B., Barros, V. R., Dokken, D. J., Mach, K. J., Mastrandrea, M. D., Bilir, T. E., Chatterjee, M., Ebi, K. L., Estrada, Y. O., Genova, R. C., Girma, B., Kissel, E. S., Levy, A. N., MacCracken, S., Mastrandrea, P. R. and White, L. L. (eds.), Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (pp. 132). Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
NATO Joint Medical Committee (2012). Psychosocial care for people affected by disasters and major incidents: a model for designing, delivering and managing psychosocial services for people involved in major incidents, conflict, disasters and terrorism. Available at: www.coe.int/t/dg4/majorhazards/ressources/virtuallibrary/materials/Others/NATO_Guidance_Psychosocial_Care_for_People_Affected_by_Disasters_and_Major_Incidents.pdf/.Google Scholar
Norris, F. N. (1992). Epidemiology of trauma: frequency and impact of different potentially traumatic events on different demographic groups. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 60, 409418.Google Scholar
Parker, G. et al. (2015). Mental health implications for older adults after natural disasters–a systematic review and meta-analysis. International Psychogeriatrics, published online 27 July 2015, http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1041610215001210.Google ScholarPubMed