Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T00:40:40.242Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Mutational and Susceptibility Genetics Are Different Clinical Paradigms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 January 2005

Allen D. Roses
Affiliation:
Center for Human Genetics, Departments of Medicine, (Neurology) and Neurobiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

During the past 2 years there have been several consensus conferences on diagnostic testing for Alzheimer's disease (AD), specifically related to the use of new genetic tests (Farrer et al., 1995; Relkin et al., 1996). Unfortunately there is an appearance of controversy between some of the published opinions and the empirical data (Saunders et al., 1996; Slooter et al., 1996). The clinical paradigm for AD has changed from “ruling out” a small list of reversible and treatment causes of dementia to “ruling in” the diagnosis of AD using adjunctive genetic tests with a high positive predictive value for some patients (Roses & Saunders, in press).

Type
Guest Editorials
Copyright
© 1997 International Psychogeriatric Association