Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T19:01:04.301Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Making room for wisdom

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 April 2021

Michael L. Thomas  and
John R. Duffy
Michael L. Thomas*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA
John R. Duffy
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA
*
Email [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentary
Information
International Psychogeriatrics , Volume 34 , Special Issue 3: Issue Theme: Positive Psychiatry Factors and Health , March 2022 , pp. 213 - 214
Copyright
© International Psychogeriatric Association 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ardelt, M. (2003). Empirical assessment of a three-dimensional wisdom scale. Research on Aging, 25, 275–324. https://doi.org/10.1177/0164027503025003004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glück, J., König, S., Naschenweng, K., Redzanowski, U., Dorner, L., Straßer, I., & Wiedermann, W. (2013). How to measure wisdom: content, reliability, and validity of five measures. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 405. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00405 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grossmann, I., et al. (2020). The science of wisdom in a polarized world: knowns and unknowns. Psychological Inquiry, 31(2), 103–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2020.1750917 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeste, D. V., & Lee, E. E. (2019). The emerging empirical science of wisdom: definition, measurement, neurobiology, longevity, and interventions. Harvard Review of Psychiatry, 27(3), 127–140. https://doi.org/10.1097/HRP.0000000000000205 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeste, D. V., et al. (2020). Study of loneliness and wisdom in 482 middle-aged and oldest-old adults: a comparison between people in Cilento, Italy and San Diego, USA. Aging & Mental Health, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2020.1821170 Google ScholarPubMed
Leeman, T., Knight, B., Fein, E., Winterbotham, S., & Webster, J. (2022). An evaluation of the factor structure of the Self-Assessed Wisdom Scale (SAWS) and the creation of the SAWS-15 as a short measure for personal wisdom. International Psychogeriatrics, 34 , 235–245. doi: 10.1017/S1041610220004202 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, R. P. (1999). Test theory: A unified treatment (pp. xi, 485). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.Google Scholar
Strauss, M. E., & Smith, G. T. (2009). Construct validity: advances in theory and methodology. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 5(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.032408.153639 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thomas, M. L., et al. (2019). A new scale for assessing wisdom based on common domains and a neurobiological model: the San Diego Wisdom Scale (SD-WISE). Journal of Psychiatric Research, 108, 40–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2017.09.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, J. D. (2003). An exploratory analysis of a self-assessed wisdom scale. Journal of Adult Development, 10(1), 13–22. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020782619051 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitely, S. E. (1983). Construct validity: construct representation versus nomothetic span. Psychological Bulletin, 93(1), 179–197. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.93.1.179 CrossRefGoogle Scholar