Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T08:35:20.633Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Is MCI really just early dementia? A systematic review of conversion studies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 June 2004

Maddalena Bruscoli
Affiliation:
Geriatrician, Department of Critical Care Medicine and Surgery, Section of Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
Simon Lovestone
Affiliation:
Professor of Old Age Psychiatry, Section of Old Age Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, London, U.K.
Get access

Abstract

Objectives: Older people commonly present with memory loss although on assessment are not found to have a full dementia complex. Previous studies have suggested however that people with subjective and objective cognitive loss are at higher risk of dementia. We aimed to determine from the literature the rate of conversion from mild cognitive impairment to dementia.

Methods: Systematic review of MedLine, PsychLit and EmBase.

Results: We identified 19 longitudinal studies published between 1991 and 2001 that addressed conversion of mild cognitive impairment to dementia. Overall the rate of conversion was 10% but with large differences between studies. The single biggest variable accounting for between study heterogeneity was source of subjects, with self-selected clinic attenders having the highest conversion rate. The most important factor accounting for heterogeneity within studies was cognitive testing, with poor performance predicting conversion with a high degree of accuracy.

Conclusions: These data strongly support the notion that subjective and objective evidence of cognitive decline is not normal and predicts conversion to dementia. The more stringent the measures of both variables the better the prediction of conversion. Mild cognitive impairment, appropriately diagnosed, is a good measure with which to select subjects for disease modification studies.

Type
Review Article
Copyright
© International Psychogeriatric Association 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)