Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T14:22:45.895Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Immediate story recall in elderly individuals with memory complaints: how much does it contribute to memory assessment?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 March 2015

Gabriel Coutinho*
Affiliation:
D’Or Institute for Research and Education (IDOR), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil Morphological Sciences Program (PCM), Institute of Biomedical Sciences (ICB), Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ)
Cláudia Drummond
Affiliation:
D’Or Institute for Research and Education (IDOR), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil Morphological Sciences Program (PCM), Institute of Biomedical Sciences (ICB), Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ)
Ricardo de Oliveira-Souza
Affiliation:
D’Or Institute for Research and Education (IDOR), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil Federal University of the State of Rio de Janeiro (UNI-Rio), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Jorge Moll
Affiliation:
D’Or Institute for Research and Education (IDOR), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Fernanda Tovar-Moll
Affiliation:
D’Or Institute for Research and Education (IDOR), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil Morphological Sciences Program (PCM), Institute of Biomedical Sciences (ICB), Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ)
Paulo Mattos
Affiliation:
D’Or Institute for Research and Education (IDOR), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil Morphological Sciences Program (PCM), Institute of Biomedical Sciences (ICB), Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ) Institute of Psychiatry (IPUB) Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: Gabriel Coutinho Rua Diniz Cordeiro, 30, 2° andar, Botafogo, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, 22281–100, Brazil. Phone/Fax: 55 21 22953796. Email: [email protected].

Abstract

Background:

Prose memory tests exhibit ecological validity, but the influence of non-memory functions on immediate recall in elderly subjects with memory complaints has not been fully investigated. This study examined (1) whether the ability to immediately recall a story can distinguish among clinical controls, amnesic mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia due to Alzheimer's disease (AD) and (2) which cognitive functions contribute to immediate recall performance.

Methods:

A total of 73 consecutive volunteers (50 women and 23 men) aged 47–88 (mean age = 71.85 ± 9.41) and with a mean schooling level of 12.51 (SD = 4.09) participated in the experiment. All individuals were seeking specialized evaluation because of memory complaints. Diagnoses were made by considering clinical, neuropsychological, and MRI assessments collected by a multidisciplinary team of neurologists, neuropsychologists, and speech-language therapists. A total of 26 individuals were classified as clinical controls; 27 as MCI patients; and 20 as having AD dementia. All individuals in the AD group had a Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) ≤ 1.

Results:

Immediate recall was only able to distinguish AD subjects from MCI patients and clinical controls (p > 0.05). Stepwise multiple linear regression analysis revealed that mental status (MMSE), semantic memory (WAIS-III vocabulary) and episodic memory (RAVLT primacy) explained approximately 62% of the variance in immediate recall.

Conclusions:

Understanding the value and limitations of immediate story recall in distinguishing between MCI and AD may help clinicians in better choosing cognitive tests to diagnose MCI.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © International Psychogeriatric Association 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Albert, M. S.et al. (2011). The diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer's disease: recommendations from the national institute on aging-Alzheimer's Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimer's & Dementia, 7, 270279.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
American Psychiatric Association (2000). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edn, text revised. Porto Alegre, RS. Artmed.Google Scholar
Baddeley, A. (2000). The episodic buffer: a new component of working memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 417423.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baddeley, A., Jarrold, C. and Vargha-Khadem, F. (2011). Working memory and the hippocampus. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23, 38553861.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baddeley, A. and Wilson, B. A. (2002). Prose recall and amnesia: implications for the structure of working memory. Neuropsychologia, 40, 17371743CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Benton, A. L. and Hamsher, K. de S. (1989). Multilingual Aphasia Examination. Iowa City: AJA Associates.Google Scholar
Brooks, B. L., Iverson, G. L., Holdnack, J. A. and Feldman, H. H. (2008). Potential for misclassification of mild cognitive impairment: a study of memory scores on the wechsler memory scale-III in healthy older adults. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 14, 463478.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brucki, S. M. and Rocha, M. S. (2004). Category fluency test: effects of age, gender and education on total scores, clustering and switching in Brazilian Portuguese-speaking subjects. Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research, 37, 17711777.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Castro-Costa, E., Fuzikawa, C., Uchoa, E., Firmo, J. O. and Lima-Costa, M. F. (2008). Norms for the Mini-mental state examination: adjustment of the cut-off point in population based studies (evidences from the Bambuí health aging study). Arquivos de Neuropsiquiatria, 66, 524528.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Foldi, N. S. (2011). Getting the hang of it: preferential gist over verbatim story recall and the roles of attentional capacity and the episodic buffer in Alzheimer Disease. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 17, 6979.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E. and McHugh, P. R. (1975). “Mini-mental state”. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12, 189198.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greenberg, D. L. and Verfaellie, M. (2010). Interdependence of episodic and semantic memory: evidence from neuropsychology. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 16, 748753.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huntley, J., Bor, D., Hampshire, A., Owen, A. and Howard, R. (2011). Working memory task performance and chunking in early Alzheimer's disease. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 198, 398403.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jefferies, E., Ralph, M. A. L. and Baddeley, A. D. (2004). Automatic and controlled processing in sentence recall: the role of long-term and working memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 51, 623643CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jonker, C., Geerlings, M. I. and Schmand, B. (2000). Are memory complaints predictive for dementia? A review of clinical and population-based studies. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 15, 983991.3.0.CO;2-5>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
La Rue, A., Hermann, B., Jones, J. E., Johnson, S., Asthana, S. and Sager, M. A. (2008). Effect of parental family history of Alzheimer's disease on serial position profiles. Alzheimer's & Dementia, 4, 285290.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Larigauderie, P., Michaud, A. and Vicente, S. (2011). The role of semantic memory in short-term recall: effect of strategic retrieval ability in an elderly population. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition: A Journal on Normal and Dysfunctional Development, 18, 147179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawton, M. P. and Brody, E. M. (1969). Assessment of older people: self-monitoring and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist, 9, 179186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lezak, M. D., Howieson, D. B. and Loring, D. W. (2004). Neuropsychological Assessment, 4th edn.New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Malloy-Diniz, L. F., Lasmar, V. A. P., Gazinelli, L. S. R., Fuentes, D. and Salgado, J. V. (2007). The rey auditory-verbal learning test: applicability for the Brazilian elderly population. Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria, 29, 324329.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McKhann, G., Drachman, D., Folstein, M., Katzman, R., Price, D. and Stadlan, E. M. (1984). Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer disease: report of NINCDS-ADRDA work group under the auspices of department of health and human service task force on Alzheimer's Disease. Neurology, 34, 939944.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Petersen, R. C., Smith, G. E., Waring, S. C., Ivnik, R. J., Tangalos, E. G. and Kokmen, E. (1999). Mild cognitive impairment: clinical characterization and outcome. Archives of Neurology, 56, 303308.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reisberg, B. and Gauthier, S. (2008). Current evidence for subjective cognitive impairment (SCI) as the pre-mild cognitive impairment (MCI) stage of subsequently manifest Alzheimer's disease. International Psychogeriatrics, 20, 116.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reitan, R. M. and Wolfson, D. (1985). The Halstead-Reitan Neuropsychological Test Battery: Theory and Clinical Interpretation. Tucson, Arizona: Neuropsychology Press.Google Scholar
Saykin, A. J.et al. (2006). Older adults with cognitive complaints show brain atrophy similar to that of amnestic MCI. Neurology, 67, 834842.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stern, Y.et al. (2005). Brain networks associated with cognitive reserve in healthy young and old adults. Cerebral Cortex, 15, 394402.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Strauss, E., Sherman, E. M. S. and Spreen, O. (2006). A Compendium of Neuropsychological Tests: Administration, Norms, and Commentary, 3rd edn.NY. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wechsler, D. (1997a). Wechsler Memory Scale-Third Edition. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
Wechsler, D. (1997b). Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Third Edition. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
Winblad, B.et al. (2004). Mild cognitive impairment – beyond controversies, towards a consensus: report of the International Working Group on Mild Cognitive Impairment. Journal of Internal Medicine, 256, 240246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar