Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T05:05:42.245Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Evaluation of the sustained implementation of a mental health learning initiative in long-term care

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2006

Carrie A. McAiney
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada Geriatric Psychiatry Service, St. Joseph's Healthcare, CMHS, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Paul Stolee
Affiliation:
School of Optometry, University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada Aging, Rehabilitation and Geriatric Care Research Centre of the Lawson Health Research Institute, London, Ontario, Canada
Loretta M. Hillier
Affiliation:
Aging, Rehabilitation and Geriatric Care Research Centre of the Lawson Health Research Institute, London, Ontario, Canada Specialized Geriatric Services of Southwestern Ontario, St. Joseph's Healthcare, London, Ontario, Canada
Diane Harris
Affiliation:
Diane Harris and Associates, Learning and Performance Consultants, Ontario, Canada
Pam Hamilton
Affiliation:
Division of Geriatric Psychiatry, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada Geriatric Psychiatry Service, Providence Continuing Care Centre, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
Linda Kessler
Affiliation:
Division of Geriatric Psychiatry, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada Geriatric Psychiatry Service, Providence Continuing Care Centre, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
Victoria Madsen
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada Geriatric Psychiatry Service, St. Joseph's Healthcare, CMHS, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
J. Kenneth Le Clair
Affiliation:
Division of Geriatric Psychiatry, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada Geriatric Psychiatry Service, Providence Continuing Care Centre, Kingston, Ontario, Canada

Abstract

Background: This paper describes an innovative education program for the management of mental health problems in long-term care (LTC) homes and the evaluation of its longer-term sustainability. Since 1998, the [ldquor]Putting the P.I.E.C.E.S. Together[rdquor] learning initiative has been providing education sessions and related learning strategies aimed at developing the knowledge and skills of health professionals who care for older persons with complex physical and mental health needs and associated behaviors, in Ontario, Canada. A major focus of this province-wide initiative was the development of in-house Psychogeriatric Resource Persons (PRPs).

Methods: Evaluation of this initiative included the completion of pre- and post-education questionnaires (over three data collection time periods) assessing learner confidence (N = 1,024 and 792, for pre- and post-education, respectively) and session evaluation questionnaires gathering feedback on the session (N = 2,029 across all sessions). A survey of LTC homes in Ontario (N = 439, 79% of the homes in the province) was conducted to assess longer-term sustainability.

Results: Ratings of the sessions indicated that they were relevant to learners' clinical practice. There were significant increases in ratings of ability to recognize and understand challenging behaviors and mental health problems, and in ability to use a variety of assessment tools. Few homes (15%) do not have a PRP; over 50% of the staff who completed the first session in 1999 continue to serve as a PRP and to apply learned skills.

Conclusions: A learning initiative with supportive and reinforcing strategies can develop in-house PRPs to enhance the care of the elderly in LTC. Incorporation of PRP functions into job descriptions and management support contributed to the success of this initiative. This study highlights the importance of work environments that support and reinforce the use of learned skills to the success of continuing education and quality improvement initiatives in LTC.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
International Psychogeriatric Association 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
Supplementary material: File

McAiney Supplementary material

Supplementary.word

Download McAiney Supplementary material(File)
File 165.9 KB
Supplementary material: File

McAiney Supplementary Material

Supplementary.word

Download McAiney Supplementary Material(File)
File 24.6 KB