Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-31T16:58:03.607Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Emotional intelligence in older adults: psychometric properties of the TMMS-24 and relationship with psychological well-being and life satisfaction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 May 2017

I. Delhom ,
M. Gutierrez ,
B. Lucas-Molina  and
J. C. Meléndez Open the ORCID record for J. C. Meléndez [Opens in a new window]
I. Delhom
Affiliation:
Developmental and Educational Psychology, University of Valencia (Spain), Av. Blasco Ibañez 21, Valencia, ES, 46010, Spain
M. Gutierrez
Affiliation:
Catholic University of Valencia (Spain), Guillem de Castro, 175, Valencia, Spain
B. Lucas-Molina
Affiliation:
Developmental and Educational Psychology, University of Valencia (Spain), Av. Blasco Ibañez 21, Valencia, ES, 46010, Spain
J. C. Meléndez*
Affiliation:
Developmental and Educational Psychology, University of Valencia (Spain), Av. Blasco Ibañez 21, Valencia, ES, 46010, Spain
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: J. C. Meléndez, Av. Blasco Ibañez 21, Valencia, ES, 46010, Spain. Phone: +34963983844. Email: [email protected].
Get access

Abstract

Background:

Aging is a process during which important changes occur in different areas of development and emotional intelligence plays an essential role. The objective of this study was twofold: first, to validate the TMMS-24 in an older population; and second, to examine the mediating role of life satisfaction in the relationship between emotional intelligence and psychological well-being.

Methods:

The sample consisted of 215 older adults (60.15% women) with a mean age of 69.56 (SD = 6.42), without cognitive impairment. Data on emotional intelligence, satisfaction with life, and psychological well-being were obtained through the TMMS-24, the SWLS, and Ryff's psychological well-being scales, respectively. Confirmatory factor analyses and structural equation modeling were conducted.

Results:

Confirmatory factor analyses confirmed the three-dimensional structure of the TMMS-24. The total scale showed an internal consistency of 0.90, ranging from 0.84 to 0.85 for the subscales. Structural equation modeling indicated that emotional intelligence exerted an influence on psychological well-being both directly and indirectly through life satisfaction.

Conclusions:

These findings show that the TMMS-24 has adequate psychometric properties for assessing emotional intelligence in elderly participants, and they indicate that emotional intelligence influences cognitive and affective judgments of life satisfaction, with these judgments of life satisfaction predicting psychological well-being.

Keywords

emotional intelligencesatisfaction with lifewell-beingolder adults
Type
Research Article
Information
International Psychogeriatrics , Volume 29 , Issue 8 , August 2017 , pp. 1327 - 1334
Copyright
Copyright © International Psychogeriatric Association 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Byrne, B. M. (2012). Structural Equation Modeling with Mplus. Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Carmeli, A., Yitzhak-Halevy, M. and Weisberg, J. (2009). The relationship between emotional intelligence and psychological wellbeing. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 24, 66–78. doi: 10.1108/02683940910922546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carstensen, L. L. et al. (2011). Emotional experience improves with age: evidence based on over 10 years of experience sampling. Psychology and Aging, 26, 21–33. doi: 10.1037/a0021285.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Diaz, D. et al. (2006). Spanish adaptation of the psychological well-being scales (PWBS). Psicothema, 18, 572–577.Google Scholar
Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J. and Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71–75. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13.Google Scholar
Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E. and Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 276–302.Google Scholar
Extremera, N. and Fernández-Berrocal, P. (2005). Perceived emotional intelligence and life satisfaction: predictive and incremental validity using the trait meta-mood scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 39, 937–948. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2005.03.012.Google Scholar
Extremera, N., Fernández-Berrocal, P. and Salovey, P. (2006). Spanish version of the mayer-salovey-caruso emotional intelligence test (MSCEIT). Version 2.0: reliabilities, age and gender differences. Psicothema, 18, 42–48.Google Scholar
Fernández-Berrocal, P., Extremera, N. and Ramos, N. (2004). Validity and reliability of the Spanish modified version of the Trait Meta-Mood Scale. Psychological Report, 94, 751–755. doi: 10.2466/pr0.94.3.751-755.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grant, S., Langan-Fox, J. and Anglim, J. (2009). The big five traits as predictors of subjective and psychological well-being 1. Psychological Reports, 105, 205–231. doi: 10.2466/PR0.105.1.205-231.Google Scholar
Hay, E. L. and Diehl, M. (2011). Emotion complexity and emotion regulation across adulthood. European Journal of Ageing, 8, 157–168. doi: 10.1007/s10433-011-0191-7.Google Scholar
Hu, L. and Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cut-off criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55. doi: 10.1080/10705519909540118.Google Scholar
Keyes, C. L., Shmotkin, D. and Ryff, C. D. (2002). Optimizing well-being: the empirical encounter of two traditions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 1007–1022. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.1007.Google Scholar
Lloyd, S. J., Malek-Ahmadi, M., Barclay, K., Fernandez, M. R. and Chartrand, M. S. (2012). Emotional intelligence (EI) as a predictor of depression status in older adults. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 55, 570–573. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2012.06.004.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lobo, A., Saz, P. and Marcos, G. (2002). Adaptación del Examen Cognoscitivo Mini-Mental [Adaptation of Mini-Mental State Examination]. Madrid: Tea Ediciones.Google Scholar
Lopes, P. N., Brackett, M. A., Nezlek, J. B., Schütz, A., Sellin, I. and Salovey, P. (2004). Emotional intelligence and social interaction. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1018–1034.Google Scholar
Mayer, J. D. and Salovey, P. (1997). What is emotional intelligence? In Salovey, P. and Sluyter, D. (eds.), Emotional Development and Emotional Intelligence: Implications for Educators (pp. 3–31). New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Meléndez, J. C., Tomás, J. M., Oliver, A. and Navarro, E. (2009). Psychological and physical dimensions explaining life satisfaction among the elderly: a structural model examination. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 48, 291–295. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2008.02.008.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Palomera, R. and Brackett, M. (2006). Frecuencia del afecto positivo como posible mediador entre la Inteligencia Emocional Percibida y la satisfacción vital [Frequency of positive affect as a possible mediator between perceived emotional intelligence and life satisfaction]. Ansiedad y Estrés, 12, 231–239.Google Scholar
Pavot, W. and Diener, E. (1993). Review of the satisfaction with life scale. Psychological Assessment, 5, 164–172. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.5.2.164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 1069–1081. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.57.6.1069.Google Scholar
Salovey, P. and Mayer, J. D. (1990). Emotional intelligence. Imagination Cognition and Personality, 9, 185–211. doi: 10.2190/DUGG-P24E-52WK-6CDG.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salovey, P., Mayer, J. D., Goldman, S. L., Turvey, C. and Palfai, T. P. (1995). Emotional attention, clarity, and repair: exploring emotional intelligence using the trait meta mood scale. In Pennebaker, J. W. (ed.), Emotion, Disclosure, & Health (pp. 125–154). Washington: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Salovey, P., Stroud, L. R., Woolery, A. and Epel, E. S. (2002). Perceived emotional intelligence, stress reactivity, and symptom reports: further explorations using the trait meta-mood scale. Psychology and Health, 17, 611–627. doi: 10.1080/08870440290025812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sánchez-Álvarez, N., Extremera, N. and Fernández-Berrocal, P. (2015). Maintaining life satisfaction in adolescence: affective mediators of the influence of perceived emotional intelligence on overall life satisfaction judgments in a two-year longitudinal study. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1892. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01892.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Springer, K. W. and Hauser, R. M. (2006). An assessment of the construct validity of Ryff's scales of psychological well-being: method, mode, and measurement effects. Social Science Research, 35, 1080–1102. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2005.07.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomás, J. M., Meléndez, J. C. and Navarro, E. (2008). Modelos factoriales confirmatorios de las escalas de Ryff en una muestra de personas mayores. [Factorial confirmatory models of Ryff's scales in a sample of elderly people]. Psicothema, 20, 298–304.Google Scholar
Tomás, J. M., Sancho, P., Melendez, J. C. and Mayordomo, T. (2012). Resilience and coping as predictors of general well-being in the elderly: a structural equation modeling approach. Aging & Mental Health, 16, 317–326. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2011.615737.Google Scholar