Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T06:08:41.088Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The development and testing of the dementia friendly communities environment assessment tool (DFC EAT)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 November 2016

Richard Fleming ,
Kirsty Bennett ,
Terri Preece  and
Lyn Phillipson
Richard Fleming*
Affiliation:
Dementia Training Australia, School of Nursing, Faculty of Science, Medicine and Health, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia
Kirsty Bennett
Affiliation:
Dementia Training Australia, School of Nursing, Faculty of Science, Medicine and Health, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia
Terri Preece
Affiliation:
Dementia Training Australia, School of Nursing, Faculty of Science, Medicine and Health, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia
Lyn Phillipson
Affiliation:
Australian Health Services Research Institute, Faculty of Business, Innovation Campus, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia
*
Correspondence should be address to: Professor Richard Fleming, Director, Dementia Training Australia, Faculty of Science, Medicine and Health, School of Nursing, University of Wollongong, Room 119, Building 41, NSW 2522, Australia. Phone: +61 2 4221 3422; Mobile: +61 4 03285340. Email: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background:

There is a growing recognition of the need to make the built environment in towns and cities more enabling for people with dementia. This study reports the development of a reliable tool to assess the support provided to people with dementia by public and commercial buildings such as council offices, supermarkets, banks, and medical centers as they approach, use, and leave them.

Methods:

A three-step process was carried out to develop and establish the reliability of the tool: (1) a review of principles and available tools informed the development and modification of an environmental audit tool of proven utility, (2) the draft tool was subjected to an iterative process of evaluation by a team of people with expertise in design and town planning, people with dementia and their carers, (3) inter-rater reliability and internal consistency were assessed on a sample of 60 public and commercial buildings.

Results:

The review of available tools led to the drafting of a tool that was refined through iterative, experience-based evaluation resulting in a tool that has high inter-rater reliability and internal validity. The data gathered enabled a sample of banks, libraries, shops, medical facilities, supermarkets and council offices to be compared.

Conclusions:

The new tool aids the collection of reliable information on the strengths and weaknesses of public and commercial buildings. This information is likely to be of use in the refurbishment of these buildings to improve their support of people with dementia as they use them in their daily life.

Keywords

dementiarating scalesactivities of daily living (ADLs)community care
Type
Research Article
Information
International Psychogeriatrics , Volume 29 , Issue 2 , February 2017 , pp. 303 - 311
Copyright
Copyright © International Psychogeriatric Association 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andrews, J. (2006). No shadows. Interview by terry philpot. Nursing Standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain): 1987), 20, 24–25.Google ScholarPubMed
Blackman, T. et al. (2003). The accessibility of public spaces for people with dementia: a new priority for the 'open city'. Disability and Society, 18, 357–371.Google Scholar
Boex, W. and Boex, S. (2012). Well-being through design: transferability of design concepts for healthcare environments to ordinary community settings. Housing, Care and Support, 15, 120–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brorsson, A., Öhman, A., Cutchin, M. and Nygård, L. (2013). Managing critical incidents in grocery shopping by community-living people with Alzheimer's disease. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 20, 292–301.Google Scholar
Brorsson, A., Öhman, A., Lundberg, S. and Nygård, L. (2011). Accessibility in public space as perceived by people with Alzheimer's disease. Dementia, 10, 587–602.Google Scholar
Burton, E. (2012). Streets ahead? The role of the built environment in healthy ageing. Perspectives in Public Health, 132, 161–162.Google Scholar
Burton, E., Mitchell, L. and Raman, S. (2004). Neighbourhoods for Life: Designing Dementia-Friendly Outdoor Environments. Checklist of Characteristics of Dementia-Friendly Neighbourhoods. Oxford: Oxford Institute for Sustainable Development, Oxford Brookes University.Google Scholar
Chenoweth, L. et al. (2014). Something to SMILE about: potential benefits to staff from humour therapy with nursing home residents. Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 40, 47–52.Google Scholar
Crampton, J. and Eley, R. (2013). Dementia-friendly communities: what the project “creating a dementia-friendly York” can tell us. Working with Older People, 17, 49–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, S., Byers, S., Nay, R. and Koch, S. (2009). Guiding design of dementia friendly environments in residential care settings: considering the living experiences. Dementia (14713012), 8, 185–203.Google Scholar
Fleming, R. (2011). An environmental audit tool suitable for use in homelike facilities for people with dementia. Australasian Journal on Ageing, 30 108–112.Google Scholar
Fleming, R. and Bennett, K. (2013). Environments that enhance dementia care: issues and challenges. In Nay, R., Garratt, S. and Fetherstonhaugh, D. (eds.), Older People: Issues and Innovations in Care (pp. 411–432). Chatswood: Elsevier Australia.Google Scholar
Fleming, R. and Bowles, J. (1987). Units for the confused and disturbed elderly: development, design, programmimg and evaluation. Australian Journal on Ageing, 6, 25–28.Google Scholar
Fleming, R., Goodenough, B., Low, L. F., Chenoweth, L. and Brodaty, H. (2014). The relationship between the quality of the built environment and the quality of life of people with dementia in residential care. Dementia, 15, 663–680.Google Scholar
Fleming, R. and Purandare, N. (2010). Long-term care for people with dementia: environmental design guidelines. International Psychogeriatrics, 22, 1084–1096.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keady, J. et al. (2012). Neighbourhoods and dementia in the health and social care context: a realist review of the literature and implications for UK policy development. Reviews in Clinical Gerontology, 22, 150–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landis, J. R. and Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159–174.Google Scholar
Lieberman, H., Paternò, F., Klann, M. and Wulf, V. (2006). End-user development: an emerging paradigm. In Lieberman, H., Paternò, F. and Wulf, V. (eds.), End User Development (pp. 1–8). Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
Low, L.-F. et al. (2013). The Sydney multisite intervention of laughterbosses and elderclowns (SMILE) study: cluster randomised trial of humour therapy in nursing homes. BMJ Open, 3. doi.10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002072.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marshall, M. (2001). Environment: how it helps to see dementia as a disability. In Benson, S. (ed.), Care Homes and Dementia. (pp.15–17), London: The Journal of Dementia Care.Google Scholar
McCabe, L. and Sim, D. (2006). Working in a 'dementia-friendly' office: stirling university's Iris Murdoch Building. Design Studies, 27, 615–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, L. and Burton, E. (2010). Designing dementia-friendly neighbourhoods: helping people with dementia to get out and about. Journal of Integrated Care, 18, 11–18.Google Scholar
Mitchell, L., Burton, E. and Raman, S. (2004). Dementia-friendly cities: designing intelligible neighbourhoods for life. Journal of Urban Design, 9, 89–101.Google Scholar
Mitchell, L., Burton, E., Raman, S., Blackman, T., Jenks, M. and Williams, K. (2003). Making the outside world dementia-friendly: design issues and considerations. Environment & Planning B: Planning & Design, 30, 605–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nunnally, J. C. (1970). Introduction to Psychological Measurement. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Phillipson, L. and Rees, G. (2014). Dementia-friendly communities: Kiama project leads the way. Australian Journal of DementiaCare, 3, 18–19.Google Scholar
Sloane, P. D. et al. (2002). The Therapeutic Environment Screening Survey for Nursing Homes (TESS-NH): an observational instrument for assessing the physical environment of institutional settings for persons with dementia. Journals of Gerontology Series B-Psychological Sciences & Social Sciences, 57, S69–S78.Google Scholar
Smith, R., Fleming, R., Chenoweth, L., Jeon, Y.-H., Stein-Parbury, J. and Brodaty, H. (2012). Validation of the Environmental Audit Tool in both purpose-built and non-purpose-built dementia care settings. Australasian Journal on Ageing, 31, 159–163.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Topo, P. and Kotilainen, H. (2009). Designing enabling environments for people with dementia, their family carers and formal carers. In Topo, P. and Ostlund, B. (eds.), Dementia, Design and Technology Time to Get Involved (pp. 45–59). Washington, DC: IOS Press, Assistive Technology Research Series.Google Scholar
van Schaik, P., Martyr, A., Blackman, T. and Robinson, J. (2008). Involving persons with dementia in the evaluation of outdoor environments. Cyberpsychology & Behavior: the Impact Of The Internet, Multimedia And Virtual Reality On Behavior And Society, 11, 415–424.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Fleming supplementary material

Supplementary Table

Download Fleming supplementary material(File)
File 32.3 KB