Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T19:21:27.915Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Current insights into the pathophysiology of Alzheimer's disease: selecting targets for early therapeutic intervention

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 July 2012

Harald Hampel*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Goethe University, Frankfurt/Main, Germany
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: Harald Hampel MD, MSc, Chair and Head of Department of Psychiatry, Goethe University, Heinrich-Hoffmann-Str. 10, 60528 Frankfurt am Main, Germany. Phone: +49 (0)69 6301 87300; Fax +49 (0)69 6301 87303. Email: [email protected].
Get access

Abstract

The development of therapies for Alzheimer's disease (AD) presents numerous challenges for physicians, researchers, and the pharmaceutical industry, with many drug candidates showing promise at one stage of clinical research only to fall at the next hurdle. A great number of drugs with a variety of targets and clusters of mechanisms are currently in various stages of basic and clinical investigation. However, these hypothesis-derived agents may be tested much too late in the chronically progressive disease process to demonstrate meaningful effects or outcomes, mirroring the clinical syndromal scenario in which the underlying pathophysiological disease condition is frequently diagnosed extremely late. Moreover, the complexity of the disease calls for developments and improvements in study designs and methods modeled for different target populations and disease stages (e.g. asymptomatic to prodromal to syndromal). New integrated concepts and models of disease pathophysiology, use of validated and qualified biomarkers, outcomes and endpoints, particularly the development of a surrogate outcome, may allow targeting of characteristic mechanism-derived therapies of specifically affected biological systems at different time-points in the disease process, providing increasing opportunities for early and preventative intervention. A core set of feasible diagnostic and predictive biomarkers is already validated and in the process of standardization; however, continued and intensified research efforts will likely reveal a variety of novel biomarkers that grasp the complexity of the underlying disease process. In the future, trials of drugs to modify and prevent AD may embrace enrichment strategies and maybe be stratified by disease stage, genetic factors as well as by disease endophenotypes.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © International Psychogeriatric Association 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aisen, P. S. (2009).Alzheimer's disease therapeutic research: the path forward. Alzheimer's Research and Therapy, 1, 2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bezprozvanny, I. (2010). The rise and fall of Dimebon. Drug News Perspectives, 23, 518523.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cummings, J. (2010). What can be inferred from the interruption of the semagacestat trial for treatment of Alzheimer's disease? Biological Psychiatry, 68, 876878.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DeKosky, S. T. et al. on behalf of the Ginkgo Evaluation of Memory (GEM) Study Investigators (2008). Ginkgo biloba for prevention of dementia: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA, 300, 22532262.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dubois, B. et al. (2007). Research criteria for the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease: revising the NINCDS-ADRDA criteria. Lancet Neurology, 6, 734746CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dubois, B. et al. (2010). Revising the definition of Alzheimer's disease: a new lexicon. Lancet Neurology, 9, 11181127.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Farias, S. T., Mungas, D., Reed, B. R., Harvey, D. and DeCarli, C. (2009). Progression of mild cognitive impairment to dementia in clinic vs. community-based cohorts. Archives of Neurology, 66, 11511157.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hampel, H. et al. (2010). Biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease: academic, industry and regulatory perspectives. Nature Reviews in Drug Discovery, 9, 560574.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Herrup, K. (2010). Reimagining Alzheimer's disease: an age-based hypothesis. Journal of Neuroscience, 30, 1675516762.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ipsen (2010). Encouraging results of GuidAge®, large scale European trial conducted in the prevention of Alzheimer's Dementia. Press release. Available at: http://www.ipsen.com/sites/default/files/communiques-presse/PR%20GuidAge%20Results%20FINAL%20EN.pdf; last accessed 6 March 2012.Google Scholar
Mangialasche, F., Solomon, A., Winblad, B., Mecocci, P. and Kivipelto, M. (2010). Alzheimer's disease: clinical trials and drug development. Lancet, 9, 702716.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rowe, C. C. et al. (2010). Amyloid imaging results from the Australian Imaging, Biomarkers and Lifestyle (AIBL) study of aging. Neurobiology of Aging, 31, 12751283.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sperling, R. A. et al. (2011). Amyloid-related imaging abnormalities in amyloid-modifying therapeutic trials: recommendations from the Alzheimer's Association Research Roundtable Workgroup. Alzheimer's and Dementia, 7, 367385.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Trojanowski, J. Q. and Hampel, H. (2011). Neurodegenerative disease biomarkers: guideposts for disease prevention through early diagnosis and intervention. Progress in Neurobiology, 95, 491495.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vellas, B. et al. (2010). Results of Guidage: a 5-year placebo-controlled study on the efficacy of EGb761 120 mg to prevent or delay Alzheimer's dementia onset in elderly subjects with memory complaint. Journal of Nutrition, Health and Aging, 14 (Suppl. 2), S23Google Scholar
Vemuri, P. et al. on behalf of the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (2009). MRI and CSF biomarkers in normal, MCI, and AD subjects: predicting future clinical change. Neurology, 73, 294301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Visser, P. J. et al. (2009). Prevalence and prognostic value of CSF markers of Alzheimer's disease pathology in patients with subjective cognitive impairment or mild cognitive impairment in the DESCRIPA study: a prospective cohort study. Lancet Neurology, 8, 619627.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed