Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T04:17:52.447Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Clinical characteristics of older male military veterans seeking treatment for erectile dysfunction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 July 2010

Sherry A. Beaudreau ,
Tiffany Rideaux  and
Robert A. Zeiss
Sherry A. Beaudreau*
Affiliation:
Palo Alto VA Health Care System, and the Sierra Pacific Mental Research Education and Clinical Centers, Palo Alto, CA, U.S.A. Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, U.S.A.
Tiffany Rideaux
Affiliation:
Pacific Graduate School of Psychology – Stanford Doctor of Psychology Consortium, Palo Alto University, Palo Alto, CA, U.S.A.
Robert A. Zeiss
Affiliation:
Office of Academic Affiliations, Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington, DC, U.S.A.
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: Sherry A. Beaudreau, Palo Alto VA Health Care System, 3801 Miranda Ave, 151Y/MIRECC, Department of Psychiatry/Research, Palo Alto, CA, 94304U.S.A. Phone: +1 650-493-5000 ext. 64119; Fax: +1 650-852-3297; Email: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background: Male sexual dysfunction is a significant international public health issue affecting both middle-aged and older adults. To date, however, no studies have compared age differences in psychiatric issues, frequency of sexual activity and treatment recommendations between older and middle-aged male military Veterans seeking treatment for erectile dysfunction (ED) in the U.S.A.

Methods: Data were collected between 1982 and 2003 at the Palo Alto Veterans Affairs Andrology Clinic. The 1,250 participants, aged 22 to 87 years (median = 63), completed a semi-structured interview. Using multiple linear regressions, we examined age differences in five domains: medical and endocrine risk factors; psychiatric and psychosocial risk factors; frequency of sexual behaviors; self-reported and objectively measured erectile function; and treatment recommendations.

Results: Compared with middle-aged adults, older adults were more likely to present for ED treatment with medical risk factors and were more often recommended a vacuum pump treatment. Middle-aged male Veterans were more likely to experience psychiatric risk factors for ED and were more sexually active than older Veterans. Despite greater objective erectile ability in middle-aged adults, there were no age differences in maximum self-reported erectile functioning.

Conclusions: These results provide some evidence of age-related characteristics and treatment needs of male patients seeking treatment for sexual dysfunction. We encourage health care professionals working with adults across the lifespan to consider ways to individualize psychoeducation and brief psychotherapy for the treatment of ED to the specific needs of the patient, which may vary between middle-aged and older cohorts of patients.

Keywords

agingVeteranssexual dysfunction (physiological)andrology
Type
Research Article
Information
International Psychogeriatrics , Volume 23 , Issue 1 , February 2011 , pp. 155 - 160
Copyright
Copyright © International Psychogeriatric Association 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

American Psychiatric Association (1980). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 3rd edn.Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
American Psychiatric Association (1994). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edn.Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
Araujo, A. B., Mohr, B. A. and McKinlay, J. B. (2004). Changes in sexual function in middle-aged and older men: longitudinal data from the Massachusetts Male Aging Study. Journal of American Geriatrics Society, 52, 1502–1509.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beaudreau, S. A., Litz, B. T. and Kaufman, M. (2000). Assessing male sexual dysfunction in the VHA: a clinic profile. Federal Practitioner, 11–12 August, 17–18.Google Scholar
Brooks, M. S., Laditka, S. B. and Laditka, J. N. (2008). Long-term effects of military service on mental health among veterans of the Vietnam War era. Military Medicine, 173, 570–575.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, J., Mabjeesh, N. J. and Greenstein, A. (2001). Sildenafil versus the vacuum erection device: patient preference. Journal of Urology, 166, 1779–1781.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DeLamater, J. and Moorman, S. M. (2007). Sexual behavior in later life. Journal of Aging and Health, 19, 921–945. doi: 10.1177/0898264307308342.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Derogatis, L. R. and Burnett, A. L. (2008). The epidemiology of sexual dysfunctions. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 5, 289–300.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fazio, L. and Brock, G. (2004). Erectile dysfunction: management update. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 170, 1429–1437. doi: 10.1053/cmaj.1020049.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ginsberg, T. B., Pomerantz, S. C. and Kramer-Feeley, V. (2005). Sexuality in older adults: behaviours and preferences. Age and Ageing, 34, 475–480. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afi 1 43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hackett, G. (2009). The burden and extent of comorbid conditions in patients with erectile dysfunction. International Journal of Clinical Practice, 63, 1205–1213.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Joint National Committee on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure (1984). The 1984 Report of the Joint National Committee on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. Archives of Internal Medicine, 144, 1045–1057.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joint National Committee on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure (2003). The Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. NIH Publication No. 03 – 5233. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services.Google Scholar
NIH Consensus Panel on Impotence (1993). NIH Consensus Conference. JAMA, 270, 83–90.Google Scholar
Prins, J., Blanker, M. H., Bohnen, A. M., Thomas, S. and Bosch, J. L. (2002). Prevalence of erectile dysfunction: a systematic review of population-based studies. International Journal of Impotence Research, 14, 422–432.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosen, R. C., Wing, R., Schneider, S. and Gendrano, N. III (2005). Epidemiology of erectile dysfunction: the role of medical comorbidities and lifestyle factors. Urology Clinics of North America, 32, 403–417.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shabbir, M., Mikahilidis, D. M. and Morgan, R. J. (2004). Erectile dysfunction: an underdiagnosed condition associated with multiple risk factors. Current Medical Research and Opinion, 20, 603–606.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
U. S. Census Bureau (2000). Decennial Census and Population Projections. Available at: http://www.aoa.gov/agingstatsdotnet/Main_Site/Data/2008_Documents/Population.aspxGoogle Scholar