Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T18:14:08.194Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The challenges of shared decision making in dementia care networks

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 September 2016

Leontine Groen-van de Ven ,
Carolien Smits ,
Marijke Span ,
Jan Jukema ,
Krista Coppoolse ,
Jacomine de Lange ,
Jan Eefsting  and
Myrra Vernooij-Dassen
Leontine Groen-van de Ven*
Affiliation:
Research Group Innovating with Older Adults, Centre of Expertise in Health Care and Social Work, Windesheim University of Applied Sciences, 8000 GB, Zwolle, the Netherlands
Carolien Smits
Affiliation:
Research Group Innovating with Older Adults, Centre of Expertise in Health Care and Social Work, Windesheim University of Applied Sciences, 8000 GB, Zwolle, the Netherlands
Marijke Span
Affiliation:
Research Group Innovating with Older Adults, Centre of Expertise in Health Care and Social Work, Windesheim University of Applied Sciences, 8000 GB, Zwolle, the Netherlands
Jan Jukema
Affiliation:
Research Group Innovating with Older Adults, Centre of Expertise in Health Care and Social Work, Windesheim University of Applied Sciences, 8000 GB, Zwolle, the Netherlands
Krista Coppoolse
Affiliation:
Research Centre Innovations in Care, Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences, 3001 HA, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
Jacomine de Lange
Affiliation:
Research Centre Innovations in Care, Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences, 3001 HA, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
Jan Eefsting
Affiliation:
Department of Nursing Home Medicine, EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, Free University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, the Netherlands Zonnehuisgroep IJssel-Vecht, 8003 CA, Zwolle, the Netherlands
Myrra Vernooij-Dassen
Affiliation:
Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare (IQ healthcare), Radboud Alzheimer Centre, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, the Netherlands The Netherlands and Kalorama Foundation, 6573 ZH, Beek-Ubbergen, the Netherlands
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: Leontine Groen-van de Ven, MSc, PhD Candidate, Research Group Innovating with Older Adults, Centre of Expertise in Health Care and Social Work, Windesheim University of Applied Sciences, Campus 2-6, F119, P.O. Box 10090, 8000 GB Zwolle, the Netherlands. Email: [email protected].
Get access

Abstract

Background:

Decision making is an important part of managing one's life with dementia. Shared decision making is the preferred way of involving people in decisions. Our study aimed to describe the challenges of shared decision making in dementia care networks.

Methods:

A multi-perspective qualitative study using face-to-face interviews with 113 respondents in 23 care networks in the Netherlands consisting of 23 people with dementia, 44 of their informal caregivers, and 46 of their professional caregivers. The interview guide addressed the decision topics, who were involved in the decision making and their contributions to the decision making. We used content analysis to delineate categories and themes.

Results:

The themes and categories that emerged are: (1) adapting to a situation of diminishing independence, which includes the continuous changes in the care network, resulting in shifting decision-making roles and the need for anticipating future decisions; and (2) tensions in network interactions which result from different perspectives and interests and which require reaching agreement about what constitutes a problem by exchanging information in the care network.

Conclusion:

The challenges in dementia care networks relate to all dimensions of social health. They have implications for a model of shared decision making in dementia care networks. Such a model requires flexibility regarding changing capabilities to preserve the autonomy of the person with dementia. It needs working towards a shared view about what constitutes a problem in the situation. It asks for professionals to advocate for the involvement of people with dementia by helping them participate in ways that strengthen their remaining capacities.

Keywords

involvement in decision makingdementia care networksqualitative study
Type
Research Article
Information
International Psychogeriatrics , Volume 30 , Special Issue 6: Social Health , June 2018 , pp. 843 - 857
Copyright
Copyright © International Psychogeriatric Association 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Blanc, X. et al. (2014). Publication trends of shared decision making in 15 high impact medical journals: a full-text review with bibliometric analysis. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 14, 1–9. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-14-71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boyle, G. (2014). Recognising the agency of people with dementia. Disability & Society, 29, 1130–1144. doi: 10.1080/09687599.2014.910108.Google Scholar
Corbin, J. and Strauss, A. (1990). Grounded theory research: procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology, 13, 3–22Google Scholar
Coyne, I. T. (1997). Sampling in qualitative research. Purposeful and theoretical sampling; merging or clear bounderies? Journal of Advanced Nursing, 26, 623–630CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Creswell, J. (1998). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Traditions. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
Elo, S. and Kyngas, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62, 107–115. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x.Google Scholar
Entwistle, V. and Watt, I. S. (2006). Patient involvement in treatment decision-making: the case for a broader conceptual framework. Patient Education and Counseling, 63, 268–278. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2006.05.002.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Epstein, R. M. and Gramling, R. E. (2013). What is shared in shared decision making? Complex decisions when the evidence is unclear. Medical Care Research and Review, 70, 94S–112S. doi: 10.1177/1077558712459216.Google Scholar
Feinberg, L. F. and Whitlatch, C. J. (2001). Are persons with cognitive impairment able to state consistent choice? The Gerontologist, 41, 374–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fetherstonhaugh, D., Tarzia, L. and Nay, R. (2013). Being central to decision making means I am still here!: the essence of decision making for people with dementia. Journal of Aging Studies, 27, 143–150. doi: 10.1016/j.jaging.2012.12.007.Google Scholar
Groen-van de Ven, L. et al. (2016). Decision trajectories in dementia care networks: decisions and related key-events. Research on Aging, 1–33. doi: 10.1177/0164027516656741.Google Scholar
Hamann, J. et al. (2011). Patient participation in medical and social decisions in Alzheimer's disease. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 59, 2045–2052. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2011.03661.x.Google Scholar
Huber, M. et al. (2011). How should we define health? British Medical Journal, 343, d4163–d4163. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d4163.Google Scholar
Johnson, J. K., Barach, P. and Vernooij-Dassen, M. (2012). Conducting a multicentre and multinational qualitative study on patient transitions. BMJ Quality & Safety, 21 (Suppl. 1), i22–i28. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001197.Google Scholar
Kendall, M. et al. (2009). Use of multiperspective qualitative interviews to understand patients’ and carers’ beliefs, experiences, and needs. British Medical Journal, 399, 196–199. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b3702.Google Scholar
Livingston, G. et al. (2010). Making decisions for people with dementia who lack capacity: qualitative study of family carers in UK. BMJ, 341, c4184. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c4184.Google Scholar
Meulenbroek, O. et al. (2010). Informed consent in dementia research. Legislation, theoretical concepts and how to assess capacity to consent. European Geriatric Medicine, 1, 58–63. doi: 10.1016/j.eurger.2010.01.009.Google Scholar
Miller, L. M., Whitlatch, C. J. and Lyons, K. S. (2014). Shared decision-making in dementia: a review of patient and family carer involvement. Dementia. Epublished ahead of print, doi: 10.1177/1471301214555542.Google Scholar
Montori, V. M., Gafni, A. and Charles, C. (2006). A shared treatment decision-making approach between patients with chronic conditions and their clinicians: the case of diabetes. Health Expectations, 9, 25–36. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2006.00359.x.Google Scholar
Murphy, K., Jordan, F., Hunter, A., Cooney, A. and Casey, D. (2015). Articulating the strategies for maximising the inclusion of people with dementia in qualitative research studies. Dementia, 14, 800–824. doi: 10.1177/1471301213512489.Google Scholar
Nygård, L. (2006). How can we get access to the experiences of people with dementia? Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 13, 101–112. doi: 10.1080/11038120600723190.Google Scholar
Peisah, D., Sorinmade, O. A., Mitchell, L. and Hertogh, C. M. P. M. (2013). Decisional capacity: toward an inclusionary approach. International Psychogeriatrics, 25, 1571–1579. doi: 10.1017/S1041610213001014.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Samsi, K. and Manthorpe, J. (2013). Everyday decision-making in dementia: findings from a longitudinal interviewstudy of people with dementia and family carers. International Psychogeriatrics, 25, 949–961. doi: 10.1017/S1041610213000306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smebye, K. L., Kirkevold, M. and Engedal, K. (2012). How do persons with dementia participate in decision making related to health and daily care? A multi-case study. BMC Health Services Research, 12, 1–23. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-241.Google Scholar
Span, M. et al. (2015). An interactive web tool for facilitating shared decision-making in dementia care networks: a field study. Frontiers in Aging Neurosciences, 7, 128. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2015.00128 10.3389/fnagi.2015.00128.Google Scholar
St-Amant, O. et al. (2014). Making care decisions in home-based dementia care: why context matters. Canadian Journal on Aging, 31, 423–434. doi: 10.1017/S0714980812000396.Google Scholar
Stacey, D., Légaré, F., Pouliot, S., Kryworuchko, J. and Dunn, S. (2010). Shared decision making models to inform an interprofessional perspective on decision making: a theory analysis. Patient Education and Counseling, 80, 164–172. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2009.10.015.Google Scholar
Su, C. T., McMahan, R. D., Williams, B. A., Sharma, R. K. and Sudore, R. L. (2014). Family matters : effects of birth order, culture, and family dynamics on surrogate decision-making. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 62, 175–182. 10.1111/jgs.12610.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vernooij-Dassen, M. and Jeon, Y.-H. (2016). Social health and dementia: the power of human capabilities. International Psychogeriatrics, 28, 701–703. doi: 10.1017/S1041610216000260.Google Scholar
Wolfs, C. A. et al. (2012). Rational decision-making about treatment and care in dementia: a contradiction in terms? Patient Education and Counseling, 87, 43–48. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.07.023.Google Scholar