Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref.
Alonso-Lana, Silvia
Marquié, Marta
Ruiz, Agustín
and
Boada, Mercè
2020.
Cognitive and Neuropsychiatric Manifestations of COVID-19 and Effects on Elderly Individuals With Dementia.
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience,
Vol. 12,
Issue. ,
Manca, Riccardo
De Marco, Matteo
and
Venneri, Annalena
2020.
The Impact of COVID-19 Infection and Enforced Prolonged Social Isolation on Neuropsychiatric Symptoms in Older Adults With and Without Dementia: A Review.
Frontiers in Psychiatry,
Vol. 11,
Issue. ,
Hashimoto, Mamoru
Suzuki, Maki
Hotta, Maki
Nagase, Aki
Yamamoto, Yuki
Hirakawa, Natsuho
Nagata, Yuma
Satake, Yuto
Suehiro, Takashi
Kanemoto, Hideki
Yoshiyama, Kenji
Mori, Etsuro
and
Ikeda, Manabu
2020.
The Influence of the COVID-19 Outbreak on the Lifestyle of Older Patients With Dementia or Mild Cognitive Impairment Who Live Alone.
Frontiers in Psychiatry,
Vol. 11,
Issue. ,
Matias-Guiu, Jordi A.
Pytel, Vanesa
and
Matías-Guiu, Jorge
2020.
Death Rate Due to COVID-19 in Alzheimer’s Disease and Frontotemporal Dementia.
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease,
Vol. 78,
Issue. 2,
p.
537.
Custodio, Nilton
Castro-Suárez, Sheila
Montesinos, Rosa
Failoc-Rojas, Virgilio E.
Cruz del Castillo, Rossana
and
Herrera-Perez, Eder
2021.
Neuropsychiatric Symptoms in Patients With Alzheimer’s Disease During SARS-COV-2 Pandemic in Peru.
American Journal of Alzheimer's Disease & Other Dementias®,
Vol. 36,
Issue. ,
Okamura, Tsuyoshi
Ura, Chiaki
Sugiyama, Mika
Kugimiya, Yukiko
Okamura, Mutsuko
and
Awata, Shuichi
2021.
Everyday lives of community‐dwelling older people with dementia during the COVID‐19 pandemic in Japan.
International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry,
Vol. 36,
Issue. 9,
p.
1465.
Lorenz-Dant, Klara
and
Comas-Herrera, Adelina
2021.
The Impacts of COVID-19 on Unpaid Carers of Adults with Long-Term Care Needs and Measures to Address these Impacts: A Rapid Review of Evidence up to November 2020.
Journal of Long Term Care,
p.
124.
Manini, Arianna
Brambilla, Michela
Maggiore, Laura
Pomati, Simone
and
Pantoni, Leonardo
2021.
The impact of lockdown during SARS-CoV-2 outbreak on behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia.
Neurological Sciences,
Vol. 42,
Issue. 3,
p.
825.
Liu, Kathy Y.
Howard, Robert
Banerjee, Sube
Comas‐Herrera, Adelina
Goddard, Joanne
Knapp, Martin
Livingston, Gill
Manthorpe, Jill
O'Brien, John T.
Paterson, Ross W.
Robinson, Louise
Rossor, Martin
Rowe, James B.
Sharp, David J.
Sommerlad, Andrew
Suárez‐González, Aida
and
Burns, Alistair
2021.
Dementia wellbeing and COVID‐19: Review and expert consensus on current research and knowledge gaps.
International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry,
Vol. 36,
Issue. 11,
p.
1597.
Вишнева, Елена Михайловна
and
Веснина, Наталья Сергеевна
2021.
Неврологические аспекты COVID‑19 и его влияние на формирование деменции у пожилых людей.
Естественные и Технические Науки,
p.
140.
Toniolo, Sofia
Scarioni, Marta
Di Lorenzo, Francesco
Hort, Jakub
Georges, Jean
Tomic, Svetlana
Nobili, Flavio
Frederiksen, Kristian Steen
and
Bonanni, Laura
2021.
Dementia and COVID-19, a Bidirectional Liaison: Risk Factors, Biomarkers, and Optimal Health Care.
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease,
Vol. 82,
Issue. 3,
p.
883.
Muller, Oldrich
Svoboda, Pavel
and
Skerikova , Anezka
2021.
THE IMPACT OF THE COVID 2019 PANDEMIC ON THE SOCIAL RELATIONS OF SENIORS WITH NEUROCOGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT (CZECH REPUBLIC, YEAR 2020, 2021).
Vol. 8,
Issue. ,
p.
423.
Rajagopalan, Jayeeta
Arshad, Faheem
Thomas, Priya Treesa
Varghese, Feba
Hurzuk, Saadiya
Hoskeri, Rakshith Maneshwar
Ramappa, Renuka Bavikatti
Nair, Vasundharaa S.
Paplikar, Avanthi
Mekala, Shailaja
Manae, Tejaswini S.
Ramanna, Deepa Boralingana Palya
Rakesh, Gurrapu
Ganeshbhai, Patel Vishal
Dhiren, Shah Rutul
Komaravolu, Shashidhar
Kammammettu, Chandrasekhar
Rao, Girish N.
and
Alladi, Suvarna
2022.
Cognition, Behavior, and Caregiver Stress in Dementia during the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Indian Perspective.
Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders,
Vol. 51,
Issue. 1,
p.
90.
Wong, Roger
and
Lovier, Margaret Anne
2022.
Relationship between dementia, COVID‐19 risk, and adherence to COVID‐19 mitigation behaviors among older adults in the United States.
International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry,
Vol. 37,
Issue. 6,
Cousins, Emily
de Vries, Kay
and
Harrison Dening, Karen
2022.
‘Four walls and a garden’: Exploring the experiences of families affected by dementia during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Dementia,
Vol. 21,
Issue. 3,
p.
810.
Wei, Grace
Diehl-Schmid, Janine
Matias-Guiu, Jordi A.
Pijnenburg, Yolande
Landin-Romero, Ramon
Bogaardt, Hans
Piguet, Olivier
and
Kumfor, Fiona
2022.
The effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on neuropsychiatric symptoms in dementia and carer mental health: an international multicentre study.
Scientific Reports,
Vol. 12,
Issue. 1,
Xie, Zhen
Hui, Hao
Zhao, Zhihan
Yu, Wenjin
Wu, Rui
Zhu, Yanzhao
Song, Yuan
Cao, Bingqing
Shi, Wenzhen
Zhao, Di
Zhao, Yunsong
Lv, Junchao
Yao, Qian
Duan, Yan
Li, Jingwen
Zhang, Haijun
Zhou, Linfu
Wang, Xiaotian
Tian, Ye
and
Zhao, Gang
2022.
Nervous system manifestations related to COVID-19 and their possible mechanisms.
Brain Research Bulletin,
Vol. 187,
Issue. ,
p.
63.
Rajagopalan, Jayeeta
Arshad, Faheem
Hoskeri, Rakshith Maneshwar
Nair, Vasundharaa S
Hurzuk, Saadiya
Annam, Harikrishna
Varghese, Feba
BR, Renuka
Dhiren, Shah R
Ganeshbhai, Patel V
Kammammettu, Chandrasekhar
Komaravolu, Shashidhar
Thomas, Priya T
Comas-Herrera, Adelina
and
Alladi, Suvarna
2022.
Experiences of people with dementia and their caregivers during the COVID-19 pandemic in India: A mixed-methods study.
Dementia,
Vol. 21,
Issue. 1,
p.
214.
Hicks, Ben
Read, Sanna
Hu, Bo
Wittenberg, Raphael
Grahamslaw, Amanda
Karim, Anomita
Martin, Evelyn
Nuzum, Eleanor
Reichental, Jacob
Russell, Alice
Siddle, Elaine
Storey, Bryony
Tipping, Eva
Baxter, Kate
Birks, Yvonne
Brayne, Carol
Brimblecombe, Nicola
Dangoor, Margaret
Dixon, Josie
Gridley, Kate
Harris, Peter R.
Knapp, Martin
Miles, Eleanor
Perach, Rotem
Robinson, Louise
Rusted, Jennifer
Stewart, Rob
Thomas, Alan J.
and
Banerjee, Sube
2022.
A cohort study of the impact of COVID‐19 on the quality of life of people newly diagnosed with dementia and their family carers.
Alzheimer's & Dementia: Translational Research & Clinical Interventions,
Vol. 8,
Issue. 1,
Nault, Emilyann
Baillie, Lynne
and
Broz, Frank
2022.
Investigating the Usability of a Socially Assistive Robotic Cognitive Training Task with Augmented Sensory Feedback Modalities for Older Adults.
p.
735.
How the coronavirus 2019 pandemic affects patients with frontotemporal dementia?
Due to cognitive impairment, people with dementia in general are more likely to have a greater risk for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) exposure. At present, both caregivers and care receivers are undergoing considerable stress than usual (Japanese Psychogeriatric Society, http://www.rounen.org). Japanese government as well as other countries’ one has strongly encouraged to stay at home except for essential activities, to wear face masks in public, to wash hands frequently, to maintain social distance between people, and so on. For people with dementia, it may be difficult to understand and adapt to the dramatic change of unusual social situation and their memory problems make instructions problematic to remember (Alzheimer’s disease International, https://www.alz.co.uk/news/adi-releases-position-paper-on-covid-19-and-dementia).
Frontotemporal dementia (FTD) is known to have distinct clinical features from Alzheimer’s disease (AD), developing behavioral and language symptoms with relatively preserved memory function (Ducharme et al., Reference Ducharme2020; Neary et al., Reference Neary1998; Rascovsky et al., Reference Rascovsky2011). Patients with FTD particularly tend to show distinctive unusual behaviors such as disinhibition, loss of social awareness, overeating, perseverative and stereotyped behavior, and impulsivity which are often antisocial (Ikeda, Reference Ikeda, Ritchie, Ames, Masters and Cummings2007; Neary et al., Reference Neary1998; Rascovsky et al., Reference Rascovsky2011). Indeed, patients with FTD showed a significant higher rate of law violation as compared to AD patients (Shinagawa et al., Reference Shinagawa2017). Therefore, we hypothesize that patients with FTD would have difficulty adapting to the drastic changes in lifestyle caused by the COVID-19 outbreak, and their carers might be under unique stress.
Here, we report the results of our study of investigating the difficulties of patients with FTD in relatively mild stages and their carers under the COVID-19 pandemic, and provide information that may help to support individualized care for patients with FTD.
Patients with FTD and AD and their carers undertook semi-structured interviews of preventive actions against COVID-19
We aimed to include home-dwelling patients with FTD and AD and their carers. Patients with FTD who are regularly followed in the memory clinic of Department of Psychiatry, Osaka University Hospital, Osaka, Japan, were selected and met the following criteria: (1) those with relatively preserved basic activities of daily living (ADL) (more than 4 in the Physical Self-Maintenance Scale (PSMS) score; Lawton and Brody, Reference Lawton and Brody1969); one FTD patient was scored 4 due to her cerebral palsy and included in this survey); (2) those with a reliable informant; and (3) those who were able to provide informed content. Patients with AD were selected to match those with FTD group for age, sex, and PSMS score. The diagnosis of each dementia was established according to the international consensus criteria (Gorno-Tempini et al., Reference Gorno-Tempini2011; McKhann et al., Reference McKhann2011; Neary et al., Reference Neary1998; Rascovsky et al., Reference Rascovsky2011). All patients undertook routine neuropsychological and neuropsychiatric examinations, including the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) (Folstein et al., Reference Folstein, Folstein and McHugh1975), Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) (Hughes et al., Reference Hughes, Berg, Danziger, Coben and Martin1982), and PSMS. The PSMS is a 6-item scale that evaluates patients’ ability to perform basic ADL (toileting, feeding, grooming, dressing, physical ambulation, and bathing). Scores range from 0 to 6, with higher scores indicating better functioning. Thus, 12 patients with FTD (4 males and 7 females; mean age = 71.8 ± 5.9 years; PSMS = 5.6 ± 0.6; CDR = 0.9 ± 0.4; MMSE = 15.6 ± 7.4) and 12 patients with AD (4 males and 7 females; mean age = 72.4 ± 6.8 years; PSMS = 5.7 ± 0.6; CDR = 0.7 ± 0.2; MMSE = 22.9 ± 3.2) and their carers participated in this study. The FTD group included two patients with behavioral variant FTD (bvFTD), one with progressive non-fluent aphasia, and nine with semantic dementia (SD).
The survey was started after Japan’s April 7 Emergency Declaration and continued approximately 2 weeks to outpatients and/or their carers of our dementia clinic in face to face or televisits. Semi-structured interviews of preventive actions against COVID-19 were conducted by one of the medical staffs including neuropsychiatrists, neuropsychologists, occupational therapists, and geriatric nurse practitioners. Questions in this study included (1) Does the patient stay at home except for essential reasons? (“Staying home”), (2) Does the patient wear a face mask when he/her go out? (“Wearing a mask”), (3) Does the patient wash his/her hands when he/her come home? (“Washing hands”), and (4) Does the patient maintain physical distance between himself/herself and others? (“Social distance”). The carers were asked to answer “Yes, by himself/herself (0),” “Do after being told to do (1),” “No, even if I told to do (2),” and “Don’t know” to each question. The number scores (0, 1, 2) were given for response categories. In addition, the examiner interviewed the caregiver about the daily life of the patient. A Mann–Whitney U-test was performed to compare the scores of the two groups (p < 0.05 was considered significant). “Don’t know” responses (two in “Social distance”, respectively, for each group) were not considered in the analyses. This study was performed in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Approval was granted by the Ethics Committee of Osaka University.
Results showed patients with FTD were more difficult to take preventive measures against COVID-19 than AD
FTD group scored higher than AD group on “Washing hands” (p < 0.05) and “Social distance” (p < 0.01). In addition, there was a trend toward significance between two groups for “Staying home” (p < 0.1), with higher score for patients with FTD. Remaining one (“Wearing a mask”) did not differ between the groups (p = 0.89). Many FTD patients did not wash their hands spontaneously and required instructions by carer. This tendency was more prominent in “Social distance.” A considerable proportion of FTD patients showed difficulty in maintaining physical distance with other people even after they were requested to do so by carers. For “Staying home”, several FTD patients did not follow the carers’ words and went out for habitual activities (see below for example).
Representative examples of FTD patients’ action of preventive measures
Case 1 was a 69-year-old right-handed male with SD of left-hemisphere predominant involvement (2 years after onset of symptoms; PSMS = 5). The patient went to pachinko pinball parlor, which is one of his habitual activities, for several times. According to his wife, “It was impossible to stop him when he decided to go out.” It seems that the patient does not understand the current situation at all. For example, when he went for a walk to the park nearby, he called to his wife and said, “There were no people inside the park. Why?” (“Staying home”). The patient is reluctant to wear a face mask but when his wife put it inside his bag, he usually wears it (“Wearing a mask”). When the wife stood apart from the person in front at the register counters in a supermarket, the patient forced her to move forward. Even if the wife pointed out mark lines on floor and explained about social distancing, he continued to step closer (“Social distance”).
Case 2 was a 70-year-old right-handed female with SD of right-hemisphere predominant involvement (2 years after onset of symptoms; PSMS = 6). The patient goes shopping or walking as usual (Japanese government currently does not regulate going out for both activities) (“Staying home”). She wears a face mask spontaneously but never wash her hands with a soap. Her daughter said, “When I told her to do hand washing, she asked me why. It seems that she cannot understand that her hands are unclean without visible dirt” (“Washing hands”). The patient does not understand what the coronavirus is and even does not be aware of some kind of disease is under outbreak situation.
Why patients with FTD showed difficulty in following social distances, washing hands, and staying home?
In the present study, patients with FTD showed significantly more difficulties in keeping social distances than those with AD. It would be very difficult for patients with FTD to keep more than 2 m from others in a row in front of the register counters in supermarkets and to avoid crowded spaces such as gyms and public transports because FTD patients frequently develop socially inappropriate behaviors (disinhibition) and a lack of understanding or indifference to the feelings of others (loss of empathy). Moreover, most FTD patients showed the difficulties to understand the meaning of “social distance.”
In addition, patients with FTD showed significant difficulties in washing hands and staying home to compare with AD patients. FTD patients become increasingly inflexible and often adopt a fixed daily routine (stereotyped behavior). To introduce new lifestyle habit such as washing hands and staying home instead of each patient’s unique daily routine might be difficult by family carers.
Another intriguing finding was that only mask wearing behavior did not differ between patients with FTD and AD. To understand the importance of prevention measures, it is required to understand the general reason behind them beyond what they actually look like. Patients with FTD are known to have difficulty in understanding abstract meaning from concrete experiences (Hashimoto et al., Reference Hashimoto, Ogawa and Ikeda2011). Indeed, some FTD patients had trouble to understand that hand washing is the act of removing invisible germs and lines taped across supermarket floor are for physical distancing. This idea should also apply to mask wearing. However, since all carers wear mask when they go out, tendency to get easily influenced by visual stimuli might facilitate the FTD patients to do mask wearing (stimulus-bound behavior/environmental dependency syndrome) (Ikeda, Reference Ikeda, Ritchie, Ames, Masters and Cummings2007).
Similar to FTD patients, some AD patients showed difficulties in wearing a face mask, washing hands, and keeping social distances probably due to their memory impairment. At least, they could do these just after they were told to do so by carers.
Conclusion
The present results revealed that patients with FTD were more difficult to take preventive measures against COVID-19 (social distance, washing hands, and staying home) than those with AD. To keep social distance was of more difficult, many FTD patients did not follow carers’ instructions. Some preventive measures (such as wearing face masks) may possible to facilitate by utilizing their behavioral symptom of stimulus-bound behavior/environmental dependency syndrome. The behavioral problems of patients with FTD under COVID-19 would lead to increased caregivers’ burden due to worries about patients’ behaviors and fear of resulting infection, and fatigue of repeating the same explanations to the patients. During the current COVID-19 pandemic, special attention to the caregiving issues in FTD is an urgent need as well as, or more than those in AD, at least in relatively mild stage.
Conflicts of interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Description of authors’ roles
MS, MH, and MI designed the study. All authors collected the data. MS analyzed and interpreted the data. MS and MI wrote the paper, and EM and MH made critical revision. All authors assisted with writing the paper and approved it.