Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T18:47:02.260Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Agitation in Chinese Elderly: Validation of the Chinese Version of the Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 January 2005

Caroline Nga Pui Choy
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong SAR
Linda Chiu Wa Lam
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong SAR
Wai Chi Chan
Affiliation:
Castle Peak Hospital, Hong Kong SAR.
Sin Wah Li
Affiliation:
Castle Peak Hospital, Hong Kong SAR.
Helen Fung Kum Chiu
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong SAR
Get access

Abstract

The reliability and validity of the Chinese vesion of the Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CCMAI) were studied in 164 demented patients. The agitation pattern in Chinese elderly was also examined in this study. The CCMAI demonstrated high validity, test-retest reliability, and interrater reliability. Eighty-five precent of demented patients manifested one or more agitated behaviors at least once a week. Factor analysis yielded three subtypes of agitation: physically aggressive behaviors, physically nonaggressive behaviors, and verbally agitated behaviors. There was a linear upward trend in physical aggression as one progressed from one Global Deterioration Scale stage to the next. Community-living patients showed higher physically nonaggressive and verbally agitated behaviors, whereas institution residents exhibited a significantly higher level of physical aggression. The differences between residential and institutionalized patients need further research. Future study should focus not only on the behavioral disturbances; medical, psychological, and environmental factors should be taken into account to provide a more accurate profile.

Type
Articles
Copyright
© 2001 International Psychogeriatric Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)