Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-03T15:14:40.479Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Time that tells: critical clock-drawing errors for dementia screening

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 October 2007

Mary C. Lessig ,
James M. Scanlan ,
Hamid Nazemi  and
Soo Borson
Mary C. Lessig
Affiliation:
Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, U.S.A.
James M. Scanlan
Affiliation:
Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, U.S.A.
Hamid Nazemi
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Family, and Community, Seattle Pacific University, Seattle, Washington, U.S.A.
Soo Borson*
Affiliation:
Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, U.S.A.
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: Dr. Soo Borson, 1959 NE Pacific Street, Campus Box 356560, Seattle WA, 98195, U.S.A. Phone +1 206 685 9453; Fax +1 206 685 1139. Email: [email protected].
Get access

Abstract

Background: Clock-drawing tests are popular components of dementia screens but no single scoring system has been universally accepted. We sought to identify an optimal subset of clock errors for dementia screening and compare them with three other systems representative of the existing wide variations in approach (Shulman, Mendez, Wolf-Klein), as well as with the CDT system used in the Mini-Cog, which combines clock drawing with delayed recall.

Methods: The clock drawings of an ethnolinguistically and educationally diverse sample (N = 536) were analyzed for the association of 24 different errors with the presence and severity of dementia defined by independent research criteria. The final sample included 364 subjects with ≥5 years of education, as preliminary examination suggested different error patterns in subjects with 0–4 years of education and inadequate numbers of normal controls for reliable analysis.

Results: Eleven of 24 errors were significantly associated with dementia in subjects with ≥5 years of education, and six were combined to identify dementia with 88% specificity and 71% sensitivity: inaccurate time setting, no hands, missing numbers, number substitutions or repetitions, or refusal to attempt clock drawing. Time setting was the most prevalent error at all dementia stages, refusal occurred only in moderate and severe dementia; and ethnicity and language of administration had no effect. All critical errors increased in frequency with dementia stage. This simplified scoring system had much better specificity than two other systems (88% vs 39% for Mendez's system – 63% for Shulman's) and much better sensitivity than Wolf-Klein's (71% vs 51%). Stepwise logistic regression found the simplified system to be more strongly predictive of dementia than the three other CDT systems of dementia. Substituting the new CDT algorithm for that used in the original CDT Mini-Cog improved the Mini-Cog's specificity from 89 to 93% with minimal change in sensitivity.

Conclusions: Only six errors need be assessed to capture most of the power of clock drawing to discriminate between people with dementia and normal subjects, and improves specificity over older systems in subjects with ≥5 years of education. These errors require minimal conceptual classification and are easily detected and scored by non-specialists.

Keywords

ethnicitylanguageneuropsychologydementiageriatricsneurodegenerative diseaseMini-Cog
Type
Research Article
Information
International Psychogeriatrics , Volume 20 , Issue 3 , June 2008 , pp. 459 - 470
Copyright
Copyright © International Psychogeriatric Association 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ainslie, N. K. and Murden, R. A. (1993). Effect of education on the clock-drawing dementia screen in non-demented elderly persons. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 41, 249–252.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
American Psychiatric Association (1994). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edn (pp. 142–152), Washington DC: APA Press.Google Scholar
Borson, S. et al. (1999). The Clock Drawing Test: utility for dementia detection in multiethnic elders. Journals of Gerontology: Series A, Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, 54, 534–540.Google ScholarPubMed
Borson, S., Scanlan, J. M., Brush, M., Vitaliano, P. and Dokmak, A. (2000). The Mini-Cog: a cognitive “vital signs” measure for dementia screening in multi-lingual elderly. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 15, 1021–1027.3.0.CO;2-6>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Campbell, S., Stephens, S. and Ballard, C. (2001). Dementia with Lewy bodies: clinical features and treatment. Drugs and Aging, 18, 397–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, M. J., Ricci, C. A., Kibby, M. Y. and Edmonds, J. E. (2000). Developmental progression of clock face drawing in children. Child Neuropsychology, 6, 64–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Jager, C. A., Hogervorst, E., Combrinck, M. and Budge, M. M. (2003). Sensitivity and specificity of neuropsychological tests for mild cognitive impairment, vascular cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease. Psychological Medicine, 33, 1039–1050.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Del Ser, T., McKeith, I., Anand, R., Cicin-Sain, A., Ferrara, R. and Spiegel, R. (2000). Dementia with Lewy bodies: findings from an international multicentre study. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 10, 1034–1045.3.0.CO;2-5>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrucci, L., Cecchi, F., Guralnik, J. M., Giampaoli, S., Lo Noche, C., Baroni, A. the FINE Study Group (1996). Does the clock drawing test predict cognitive decline in older persons independent of the Mini-mental State Examination? Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 44, 1326–1331.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hughes, C. P., Berg, L., Danzinger, W. L., Coben, L. A. and Martin, R. L. (1982). A new clinical rating scale for the staging of dementia. British Journal of Psychiatry, 140, 566–572.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lund and Manchester Groups (1994). Clinical and neuropathological criteria for frontotemporal dementia. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 57, 416–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKhann, G., Drachman, D., Folstein, M. F., Katzman, R., Price, D. and Stadlan, E. M. (1984). Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease: report of the NINCDS-ADRDA work group under the auspices of the Department of Health and Human Services Task Force on Alzheimer's disease. Neurology, 34, 939–944.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mendez, M. F., Ala, T. and Underwood, K. L. (1992). Development of scoring criteria for the clock drawing task in Alzheimer's disease. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 40, 1095–1099.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paganini-Hill, A., Clark, L. J., Henderson, V. W. and Birge, S. J. (2001). Clock drawing: analysis in a retirement community. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 49, 941–947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powlishta, K. K. et al. (2002). The clock drawing test is a poor screen for very mild dementia. Neurology, 59, 898–903.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Román, G. C. et al. (1993). Vascular dementia: diagnostic criteria for research studies. Report of the NINDS-AIREN International Workshop. Neurology, 43, 250–260.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rouleau, I., Salmon, D. P. and Butters, N. (1996). Longitudinal analysis of clock drawing in Alzheimer's disease patients. Brain and Cognition, 31, 17–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Royall, D. R., Mullroy, A. R., Chiodo, L. K. and Polk, M. J. (1999). Clock drawing is sensitive to executive control: a comparison of six methods. Journals of Gerontology: Series B, Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 54, 328–333.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scanlan, J. M., Brush, M., Quijano, C. and Borson, S. (2002). Comparing clock tests for dementia screening: naive judgments vs formal systems – what is optimal? International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 17, 14–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seigerschmidt, E., Mösch, E., Siemen, M., Förstl, H., and Bickel, H. (2002). The clock drawing test and questionable dementia: reliability and validity. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 17, 1048–1054.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shulman, K. I. (2000). Clock-drawing: is it the ideal cognitive screening test? International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 15, 548–561.3.0.CO;2-U>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shulman, K. I., Gold, D. P., Cohen, C. A. and Zucchero, C. A. (1993). Clock-drawing and dementia in the community: a longitudinal study. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 8, 487–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shulman, K. I. et al. (2006). IPA survey of brief cognitive screening instruments. International Psychogeriatrics, 18, 281–294.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Storey, J. E., Rowland, J. T. J., Basic, D. and Conforti, D. A. (2001). A comparison of five clock scoring methods using ROC (receiver operator characteristic) curve analysis. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 16, 394–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sunderland, T. et al. (1989). Clock drawing in Alzheimer's disease: a novel measure of dementia severity. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 37, 725–729.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tuokko, H., Hadjistavropoulos, T., Miller, J. A. and Beattie, B. L. (1992). The clock test: a sensitive measure to differentiate non-demented elderly from those with Alzheimer's disease. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 40, 579–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yamamoto, S. et al. (2004). The clock drawing test as a valid screening method for mild cognitive impairment. Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders, 18, 172–179.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wolf-Klein, G. P., Silverstone, F. A., Levy, A. P. and Brod, M. S. (1989). Screening for Alzheimer's disease by clock drawing. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 37, 730–734.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zekry, D., Hauw, J. J. and Gold, G. (2002). Mixed dementia: epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 50, 1431–1438.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed