Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-03T17:06:59.041Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reliability and validity of the Attitudes to Ageing Questionnaire (AAQ) in older people in Spain

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 November 2012

Ramona Lucas-Carrasco ,
Ken Laidlaw ,
Juana Gómez-Benito  and
Michael J. Power
Ramona Lucas-Carrasco*
Affiliation:
Department of Methodology of Behavioural Sciences, Faculty of Psychology, University of Barcelona, SGR822 Generalitat de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain
Ken Laidlaw
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Psychology, School of Health in Social Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9AG, UK
Juana Gómez-Benito
Affiliation:
Department of Methodology of Behavioural Sciences, Faculty of Psychology, University of Barcelona, SGR822 Generalitat de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain
Michael J. Power
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Psychology, School of Health in Social Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9AG, UK Department of Psychology, University of Tromso, Tromso, Norway
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: Ramona Lucas-Carrasco, Department of Methodology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Barcelona, Passeig Vall d'Hebron, 171 08035, Barcelona, Spain. Phone: +34-93-3125177. Email: [email protected].
Get access

Abstract

Background: As ageing is a personal experience, an attitude to ageing questionnaire is essential for capturing the most realistic appraisal of this important stage of life. Our aim was to study the psychometric properties of the Attitudes to Ageing Questionnaire (AAQ) in a sample of Spanish older people.

Methods: A total of 242 participants aged 60 years and older were recruited from community centers, primary care centers, and family associations for the mentally ill and dementia. In addition to the AAQ, participants provided information on demographics, self-perception of health, comorbidity, health status (SF-12), depressive symptoms (GDS-30), and quality of life (WHOQOL-BREF and WHOQOL-OLD). Analysis was performed using standard psychometric techniques with SPSS v15.0.

Results: No floor and ceiling effects were found, and missing data were low. The internal consistency measured by Cronbach's alpha for AAQ subscales were 0.59, 0.70, and 0.73. Exploratory Factor Analysis produced a three-factors solution accounting for 34% of the variance. A priori expected associations were found between some AAQ subscales with WHOQOL-BREF domains, with WHOQOL-OLD, SF-12, and the GDS-30 indicating good construct validity. In general, AAQ subscales differentiated between participants with lower and higher levels of education, and between a priori defined groups of older people (non-depressed vs. depressed; those with higher vs. lower physical comorbidities, and non-carers vs. carers).

Conclusions: The Spanish version of the AAQ questionnaire showed acceptable psychometric properties in a convenience sample of Spanish older people. It is a useful measure of attitude for use with older people in social and clinical services.

Keywords

Attitudes to Ageing Questionnaire (AAQ)elderlyreliabilityvalidity
Type
Research Article
Information
International Psychogeriatrics , Volume 25 , Issue 3 , March 2013 , pp. 490 - 499
Copyright
Copyright © International Psychogeriatric Association 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Boerner, K. and Jopp, D. (2007). Improvement/maintenance and reorientation as central features of coping with major life change and loss: contributions of three life-span theories. Human Development, 50, 171–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryant, C., Bei, B., Gilson, K., Komiti, A., Jackson, H. and Judd, F. (2012). The relationship between attitudes to aging and physical and mental health in older adults. International Psychogeriatrics, 24, 1674–1683. doi:10.1017/S1041610212000774.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burroughs, H., Lovell, K., Morley, M., Baldwin, R., Burns, A. and Chew-Graham, C. (2006). “Justifiable depression”: how primary care professionals and patients view late life depression? A qualitative study. Family Practice, 23, 369–377.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carstensen, L. L. and Löckenhoff, C. E. (2003). Ageing, emotion, and evolution: the bigger picture. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1000, 152–179.Google ScholarPubMed
Carstensen, L. C.et al. (2011). Emotional experience improves with age: evidence based on over 10 years of experience sampling. Psychology & Ageing, 26, 21–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chachamovich, E., Fleck, M., Laidlaw, K. and Power, M. (2008). Impact of major depression and subsyndromal symptoms on quality of life and attitudes toward ageing in an international sample of older adults. Gerontologist, 48, 593–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd edn. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Cohen, S. and Wills, T. A. (1985). Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 98 (2), 310–357.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cohen, C. A., Colantonio, A. and Vernich, L. (2002). Positive aspects of caregiving: rounding out the caregiver experience. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 17, 184–188.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Enquesta de salut de Catalunya (ESCA) (2002). Catalonia, Spain: Departament de Sanitat i Seguretat Social, Generalitat de Catalunya. Available at: http://www.gencat.cat/salut/depsalut/pdf/vis2002es.pdf; last accessed August 2005.Google Scholar
Fong, T., Finlayson, M. and Peacock, N. (2006). The social experience of ageing with a chronic illness: perspectives of older adults with multiple sclerosis. Disability and Rehabilitation, 28, 695–705.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harrison, T., Blozis, S. and Stuifbergen, A. (2008). Longitudinal predictors of attitudes toward ageing among women with multiple sclerosis. Psychology and Ageing, 23 (4), 823–832.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Laidlaw, K., Power, M. J., Schmidt, S. and The WHOQOL-OLD Group (2007). The attitudes to ageing questionnaire (AAQ): development and psychometric properties. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 22, 367–379.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lawton, M. P. (1975). The Philadelphia Geriatric Center Morale Scale: a revision. Journal of Gerontology, 30, 85–89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levy, B. R. (2003). Mind matters: cognitive and physical effects of ageing self-stereotypes. Journal of Gerontology, 58B, 203–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levy, B. R. (2009). Stereotype embodiment: a psychosocial approach to aging. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18, 332–336.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levy, B. and Myers, L. (2005). Relationship between respiratory mortality and self-perceptions of ageing. Psychology and Health, 20, 553–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levy, B. R., Slade, M. D. and Kasl, S. V. (2002). Longitudinal benefit of positive self-perceptions of ageing on functional health. Journal of Gerontology, 57B, 409–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucas-Carrasco, R., Laidlaw, K. and Power, M. J. (2011). Suitability of the WHOQOL–BREF and WHOQOL-OLD for Spanish older adults. Ageing and Mental Health, 15, 595–604.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lucas-Carrasco, R. and Monteserín, R. (2007). What constitutes quality of life for people with cognitive impairment and dementia? 2007 International Society for Quality of Life Research meeting abstracts. Quality of Life Research Supplement, A-12, abstract #1243. Available at: http://www.isoqol.org/2007mtgabstracts.pdf.Google Scholar
Nunnally, J. and Bernstein, I. (1994). Psychometric Theory, 3rd edn. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
O'Connor, E. J. and McCabe, M. P. (2011). Predictors of quality of life in carers for people with a progressive neurological illness: a longitudinal study. Quality of Life Research, 20, 703–711.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pinquart, M. and Sorensen, S. (2011). Spouses, adult children, and children-in-law as caregivers of older adults. A meta-analytic comparison. Psychology & Aging, 26, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Power, M. J., Quinn, K., Schmidt, S. and The WHOQOL-OLD Group (2005). Development of the WHOQOL-OLD module. Quality of Life Research, 14, 2197–2214.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sarkisian, C. A., Lee-Henderson, M. H. and Mangione, C. M. (2003). Do depressed older adults who attribute depression to “old age” believe it is important to seek care? The Journal of General Internal Medicine, 18, 1001–1005.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stock, W. A., Okun, M. A. and Gómez Benito, J. (1994). Subjective well-being measures: reliability and validity among Spanish elders. International Journal of Ageing and Human Development, 38, 221–235.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Streiner, D. L. and Norman, G. R. (1995). Validity. In Streiner, D. L. and Norman, G. R. (eds.), Health Measurement Scales, 2nd edn. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
The WHOQOL Group (1998a). The World Health Organization Quality of Life Assessment (WHOQOL): development and general psychometric properties. Social Science and Medicine, 46, 1569–1585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The WHOQOL Group (1998b). Development of the World Health Organization WHOQOL–BREF Quality of Life Assessment. Psychological Medicine, 28, 551–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
United Nations. (2009). World Population Prospects: The 2008 Revision, Highlights, Working paper no. ESA/P/WP.210. New York, NY: Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division.Google Scholar
Vaillant, G. E. (2002). Ageing Well: Surprising Guideposts to a Happier Life from the Landmark Harvard Study of Adult Development. Boston, MA: Little Brown.Google Scholar
Ware, J. E., Kosinski, M., Turner-Bowker, D. M., Gandek, B. and Keller, S. D. (2002). How to Score: Version 2 of the SF-12 Health (with a supplement documenting version 1). Lincoln, RI: Health Assessment Lab; Boston, MA: Quality Metric Inc.Google Scholar
Yesavage, J. A.et al. (1983). Development and validation of a geriatric depression scale: a preliminary report. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 17, 37–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar