Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T16:03:36.349Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On studying ageism in long-term care: a systematic review of the literature

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 November 2016

José Manuel Sousa de São José Open the ORCID record for José Manuel Sousa de São José [Opens in a new window]  and
Carla Alexandra Filipe Amado
José Manuel Sousa de São José*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Economics, University of Algarve and CIEO, Campus de Gambelas, 8005-139, Faro, Portugal
Carla Alexandra Filipe Amado
Affiliation:
Faculty of Economics, University of Algarve and CEFAGE-UAlg, Campus de Gambelas, 8005-139, Faro, Portugal
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: Dr José Manuel Sousa de São José, Faculty of Economics, University of Algarve and CIEO, Campus de Gambelas, 8005-139 Faro, Portugal. Phone: +351 289 817571; Fax: +351 289 800064. Email: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background: Ageism in long-term care is pervasive, but it is not easy to define, to identify and to fight it in practice. These difficulties could be overcome if we develop research capable to conceptualize, detect, measure, and understand the multidimensionality and complexity of ageism. Nevertheless, to achieve this, it is fundamental to know how ageism in long-term care has been previously studied.

Methods: This paper systematically reviews studies on ageism in long-term care services published before October 2015 and indexed in Web of Science, PubMed, and Social Care Online electronic databases. Electronic searches were complemented with visual scanning of reference lists and hand searching of leading journals in the field of gerontology. Four specific review questions were addressed: Which analytical angles (aetiology, prevalence, manifestations, consequences, and interventions) have been explored? Which theories and concepts have been used? Which methods have been employed? Which variants of ageism have been covered?

Results: Studies have focused mainly on the manifestations, etiology, and prevalence of ageism, neglecting its consequences and the interventions to tackle it; a significant number of studies used scales of ageism which, despite being appropriate considering the aims of the research, present important limitations; most studies have focused on residential services, neglecting non-residential services; some of the variants of ageism have been well covered, while implicit and self-ageism have been under-explored.

Conclusions: Research on ageism in long-term care services is scarce but important. Much has been done but much remains to be done. An agenda for future research is presented.

Keywords

ageismage-discriminationlong-term caresystematic review
Type
Review Article
Information
International Psychogeriatrics , Volume 29 , Issue 3 , March 2017 , pp. 373 - 387
Copyright
Copyright © International Psychogeriatric Association 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abrams, D., Swift, H. J., Lamont, R. A. and Drury, L. (2015). The Barriers to and Enablers of Positive Attitudes to Ageing and Older People, At the Societal and Individual Level. Foresight, Government Office for Science. Kent: University of Kent. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/454735/gs-15-15-future-ageing-attitudes-barriers-enablers-er06.pdf; last accessed 4 September 2015.Google Scholar
Alley, D. E., Putney, N. M., Rice, M. and Bengtson, V. L. (2010). The increasing use of theory in social gerontology: 1990–2004. The Journals of Gerontology. Series B, Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 65, 583–590. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbq053.Google Scholar
Angus, J. and Reeve, P. (2006). Ageism: a threat to “Aging Well” in the 21st Century. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 25, 137. doi: 10.1177/0733464805285745.Google Scholar
Ayalon, L. (2014). Perceived age, gender, and racial/ethnic discrimination in Europe: results from the European social survey. Educational Gerontology, 40, 499–517. doi: 10.1080/03601277.2013.845490.Google Scholar
Ayalon, L. (2015). Perceptions of old age and aging in the continuing care retirement community. International Psychogeriatrics, 27, 611–6620. doi: 10.1017/S1041610214002415.Google Scholar
Band-Winterstein, T. (2013). Health care provision for older persons: the interplay between ageism and elder neglect. Journal of Applied Gerontology, XX, 1–15. doi: 10.1177/0733464812475308.Google Scholar
Bengtson, V. L., Gans, D., Pulney, N. M. and Silverstein, M. (2009). Handbook of Theories of Aging, 2nd edn. New York: Springer Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Bettio, F. and Verashchagina, A. (2010). Long-Term Care for the Elderly. Provisions and Providers in 33 European Countries, EU Expert Group on Gender and Employment. Roma: Fondazione G. Brodolini.Google Scholar
Billings, J. (2006). Staff perceptions of ageist practice in the clinical setting: practice development project. Quality in Ageing and Older Adults, 7, 33–45. doi: org/10.1108/14717794200600012.Google Scholar
Bodner, E., Cohen-Fridel, S. and Yaretzky, A. (2011). Sheltered housing or community dwelling: quality of life and ageism among elderly people. International Psychogeriatrics, 23, 1197–1204. doi: 10.1017/S1041610211001025.Google Scholar
Bowers, H. et al. (2009). Older People's Vision for Long-term Care. Executive Summary. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation, Available at: http://www.cpa.org.uk/ltc/older-people-vision-for-care-full.pdf; last accessed 4 September 2015.Google Scholar
Butler, R. N. (1969). Age-ism: another form of bigotry. The Gerontologist, 9, 243–246.Google Scholar
Butler, R. N. (1975). Why Survive? Being old in America. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Bytheway, B. and Johnson, J. (2001). An evaluation of the use of diaries in a study of medication in later life. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 3, 183–204. doi: 10.1080/13645570010029467.Google Scholar
Calasanti, T. M. and Slevin, K. F. (2006). Age Matters: Realigning Feminist Thinking. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Carolan, C. M., Smith, A. and Forbat, L. (2015). Conceptualising psychological distress in families in palliative care: findings from a systematic review. Palliative Medicine, 29, 605–632.Google Scholar
Condelius, A. and Andersson, M. (2015). Exploring access to care among older people in the last phase of life using the behavioural model of healthservices use: a qualitative study from the perspective of the next of kin of older persons who had died in a nursing home. BMC Geriatrics, 15, 138. doi: 10.1186/s12877-015-0126-9.Google Scholar
CRD (2009). Systematic Reviews. CRD's Guidance for Undertaking Reviews in Health Care. Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. York. Available at: https://www.york.ac.uk/media/crd/Systematic_Reviews.pdf; last accessed 4 September 2015.Google Scholar
Cuddy, A., Norton, J. C., Norton, M. I. and Fiske, S. T. (2005). This old stereotype: the pervasiveness and persistence of the elderly stereotype. Journal of Social Issues, 61, 267–285. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.2005.00405.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobbs, D. et al. (2008). An ethnographic study of stigma and ageism in residential care or assisted living. The Gerontologist, 48, 517–526.Google Scholar
Doyle, S. (2014). The impact of power differentials on the care experiences of older people. Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect, 26, 319–332. doi: 10.1080/08946566.2013.875970.Google Scholar
Dunworth, M. and Kirwan, P. (2012). Do nurses and social workers have different values? An exploratory study of the care for older people. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 1–6. doi: 10.3109/13561820.2011.645172.Google Scholar
Ferraro, K. F. (2009). Theory welcome here. The Journals of Gerontology. Series B, Psychological Sciences and Social Science, s 64b, 75–76.Google Scholar
Fraboni, M., Saltstone, R. and Hughes, S. (1990). The Fraboni scale of ageism (FSA): an attempt at a more precise measure of ageism. Canadian Journal on Aging/La Revue Canadienne du Vieillissement, 9, 55–56.Google Scholar
Gamliel, T. (2000). The lobby as an arena in the confrontation between acceptance and denial of old age. Journal of Aging Studies, 14, 251–271.Google Scholar
Gething, L. (1994). Health professionals’ attitudes towards ageing and older people: preliminary report of the reactions to ageing questionnaire. Australasian Journal on Ageing, 13, 77–81.Google Scholar
Gilleard, C. and Higgs, P. (2011). Ageing abjection and embodiment in the fourth age. Journal of Aging Studies, 25, 135–142.Google Scholar
Greenberg, J., Schimel, J. and Martens, A. (2002). Ageism: denying the face of the future. In Nelson, T. D. (ed.), Ageism: Stereotyping and Prejudice Against Older Persons (pp. 27–48). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hagestad, G. O. and Uhlenberg, P. (2005). The social separation of old and young: a root of ageism. Journal of Social Issues, 61, 343–360. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.2005.00409.x.Google Scholar
Huber, M., Rodrigues, R., Hoffmann, F., Gasior, K. and Marin, B. (2009). Facts and Figures on Long-Term Care. Europe and North America. Vienna: European Centre.Google Scholar
Iversen, T. N., Larsen, L. and Solem, P. E. (2009). A conceptual analysis of Ageism. Nordic Psychology, 61, 4–22.Google Scholar
Kane, R. L. and Kane, R. A. (2005). Ageism in healthcare and long-term care. Generations, 29, 49–54.Google Scholar
Kogan, N. (1961). Attitudes towards old people: the development of a scale and examination of correlates. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 62, 44–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lafortune, G. and Balestat, G. (2007). Trends in Severe Disability Among Elderly People: Assessing the Evidence in 12 OECD Countries and the Future Implications. OECD Health Working Papers, No. 26. Paris: OECD Publishing. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/217072070078; last accessed 4 September 2015.Google Scholar
Lagacé, M., Medouar, F., Loock, J. and Davignon, A. (2011). À mots couverts: le regard des aînés et des soignants sur la communication quotidienne et ses manifestations d'âgisme implicite. Canadian Journal on Aging/La Revue Canadienne du Vieillissement, 30, 185–196. doi: 10.1017/S0714980811000092.Google Scholar
Lagacé, M., Tanguay, A., Lavallée, M., Laplante, J., Robichaud, S. (2012). The silent impact of ageist communication in long term care facilities: elders' perspectives on quality of life and coping strategies. Journal of Aging Studies, 26, 335–342.Google Scholar
Lamont, R. A., Swift, H. J. and Abrams, D. (2015). A review and meta-analysis of age-based stereotype threat: negative stereotypes, not facts, do the damage. Psychology and Aging, 31, 180–193.Google Scholar
Laslett, P. (1994). The third age, the fourth age and the future. Ageing & Society, 14, 436–447.Google Scholar
Levy, B. R. (2003). Mind matters: cognitive and physical effects of aging self-stereotypes. The Journals of Gerontology. Series B, Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 58B, 203–211.Google Scholar
Levy, B. R. and Banaji, M. R. (2002). Implicit ageism. In Nelson, T. D. (ed.), Ageism Stereotyping and Prejudice Against Older Persons (pp. 49–75). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
MacDonald, C. D. and Butler, L. (2007). Silent no more elderly women's stories of living with urinary incontinence in long term care. Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 33, 14–20.Google Scholar
Martin, J. L. and Ancoli-Israel, S. (2008). Sleep disturbances in long-term care. Clinical Geriatric Medicine, 24, 39–50.Google Scholar
McHugh, K. E. (2003). Three faces of ageism: society, image and place. Ageing & Society, 23, 165–185.Google Scholar
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., The PRISMA Group. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. PLoS Medicine, 6. Available at: http://www.plosmedicine.org/article/fetchObject.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097&representation=PDF; last accessed 4 September 2015.Google Scholar
Natan, M. B., Ataneli, M., Admenko, A. and Noy, R. H. (2013). Nurse assessment of residents’ pain in a long-term care facility. International Nursing Review, 60, 251–257.Google Scholar
National Health Service (2013). The Cavendish Review. An Independent Review into Healthcare Assistants and Support Workers in the NHS and Social Care Settings. London: National Health Servive. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/236212/Cavendish_Review.pdf; last accessed 4 September 2015.Google Scholar
Nelson, T. D. (2005). Ageism: prejudice against our feared future self. Journal of Social Issues, 61, 207–221.Google Scholar
Neugarten, B. (1974). Age groups in American society and the rise of the young old. The annals of the American academy of political and social science, 187–198. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 436–447. doi: 10.1017/S0144686X00001677.Google Scholar
North, M. S. and Fiske, S. T. (2012). An inconvenienced youth? Ageism and its potential intergenerational roots. Psychological Bulletin, 138, 982–997.Google Scholar
North, M. S. and Fiske, S. T. (2013). Subtyping ageism: policy Issues in succession and consumption. Social Issues and Policy Review, 7, 36–57. doi: 10.1111/j.17512409.2012.01042.x.Google Scholar
OECD (2008). OECD Health Data 2008. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
OECD (2011a). Help Wanted? Providing and Paying for Long-Term Care. Paris: OECD Publishing. doi: 10.1787/9789264097759-en.Google Scholar
OECD (2011b). Health at a Glance 2011: OECD Indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/health_glance-2011-en; last accessed 4 September 2015.Google Scholar
OECD/European Union (2013). A Good Life in Old Age? Monitoring and Improving Quality in Long-term Care, OECD Health Policy Studies. Paris: OECD Publishing. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264194564-en; last accessed 4 September 2015.Google Scholar
Palmore, E. B. (1977). Facts on aging: a short quiz. The Gerontologist, 17, 315–320.Google Scholar
Palmore, E. B. (1998). The Facts on Aging Quiz. New York: Springer Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Palmore, E. B. (1999). Ageism: Negative and Positive. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Palmore, E. B. (2001). The ageism survey: first findings. The Gerontologist, 41, 572–575.Google Scholar
Pedersen, A. D. and Mehlsen, M. (2011). Age-bias in staff appraisals of brain injury service provision? Nordic Psychology, 63, 25–39.Google Scholar
Petersen, M. and Warburton, J. (2012). Residential complexes in queensland, Australia: a space of segregation and ageism? Ageing & Society, 32, 60–84. doi: 10.1017/S0144686X10001534.Google Scholar
Popay, J. et al. (2006). Guidance on the Conduct of Narrative Synthesis in Systematic Reviews. London: ESRC Research Methods Programme.Google Scholar
Reyna, C., Goodwin, E. J. and Ferrari, J. R. (2007). Older adult stereotypes among care providers in residential care facilities. Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 33, 50–55.Google Scholar
Roberts, E., Robinson, J. and Seymor, L. (2002). Old Habits Die Hard: Tackling age Discrimination in Health and Social Care. London: King's Fund.Google Scholar
Rosencranz, H. A. and McNevin, T. E. (1969). A factor analysis of attitudes toward the aged. The Gerontologist, 9, 55–59.Google Scholar
Roth, E. G., Eckert, J. K. and Morgan, L. A. (2015). Stigma and discontinuity in multilevel senior housing's continuum of care. The Gerontologist, 00, 1–10. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnv055.Google Scholar
Roth, E. G. et al. (2012). Baby Boomers in an active adult retirement community: comity interrupted. The Gerontologist, 52, 189–198. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnr155.Google Scholar
Rupp, D. E., Vodanovich, S. J. and Credé, M. (2005). The multidimensional nature of ageism: construct validity and group differences. The Journal of Social Psychology, 145, 335–362.Google Scholar
Snellman, F. (2016). Whose ageism? The reinvigoration and definitions of an elusive concept. Nordic Psychology, 68, 148–159. doi: 10.1080/19012276.2015.1125301.Google Scholar
Taverna, M. V., Nguyen, C, Wright, R. Tysinger, J. W. and Sorenson, H. M. (2014). Iatro-compliance: an unintended consequence of excessive autonomy in long term care facilities. Journal of Dental Hygiene, 88, 53–60.Google Scholar
Thomas, J. and Harden, A. (2008). Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8, 45. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-8-45.Google Scholar
Thompson, N. (2006). Anti-discriminatory Practice. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Turner, J. H. (2005). A new approach for theoretically integrating micro and macro analysis. In Calhoun, C., Rojek, C. and Turner, B. S. (eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Sociology (pp. 405–422). New York: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
Wells, Y., Foreman, P., Gething, L. and Petralia, W. (2004). Nurses’ attitudes toward aging and older adults – examining attitudes and practices among health services providers in Australia. Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 30, 5–13.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, S., Dobbs, D., Roth, E. G., Goldman, S., Peeples, A. D. and Wallace, B. (2014). Promoting and protecting against stigma in assisted living and nursing homes. The Gerontologist, 00, 1–13. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnu058.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

São José and Amado supplementary material

Box S1

Download São José and Amado supplementary material(File)
File 19 KB
Supplementary material: File

São José and Amado supplementary material

Box S2

Download São José and Amado supplementary material(File)
File 23.2 KB
Supplementary material: File

São José and Amado supplementary material

Table S1

Download São José and Amado supplementary material(File)
File 41.2 KB
Supplementary material: File

São José and Amado supplementary material

Table S2

Download São José and Amado supplementary material(File)
File 22.7 KB
Supplementary material: File

São José and Amado supplementary material

Table S3

Download São José and Amado supplementary material(File)
File 20.7 KB