Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T06:23:44.195Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Ommoord District Residents: Prevalence and Treatment of Depression

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 March 2005

F. M. Baker
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
Lenore J. Launer
Affiliation:
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Erasmus University School of Medicine, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
Monique M. R. Breteler
Affiliation:
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Erasmus University School of Medicine, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
Albert Hofman
Affiliation:
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Erasmus University School of Medicine, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Abstract

Background: Ommoord District residents of Rotterdam, The Netherlands, age 55 and older, completed a two-stage interview to assess the risk factors for chronic disease and disability. Methods: In the in-home Stage I interview (N = 7,983), demographic data and medical history were collected by a trained lay interviewer. During Stage II, a physician interview and examination were conducted at the study center. Subjects (N = 7,129) were asked about their history of psychiatric disorders and 6,596 responded. Results: The lifetime prevalence of self-reported psychiatric disorders was 5.44% for unipolar and bipolar depressive disorders combined, 0.27% for psychotic disorders, 0.08% for alcoholism, 0.05% for drug addiction, and 3.71% for other diagnoses. Residents reporting a psychiatric diagnosis of depression were more likely to be currently taking an antidepressant medication (p < .001) and an antipsychotic medication (p < .0001), to be in current outpatient treatment (p < .001), to have been hospitalized for psychiatric illness (p < .001), to have undergone electroconvulsive treatments (p < .001), and to report a history of having made suicide attempts (p < .001). Conclusion: The self-reported lifetime prevalence of affective disorders was similar to the rates found in the Stirling County Study (Canada) and the Epidemiologic Catchment Area Survey (United States). The lower prevalence rates of the other psychiatric disorders may reflect underreporting or an age cohort effect, or may be due to the nonresponse bias.

Type
Depression
Copyright
© 1999 International Psychogeriatric Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)