Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T04:18:13.017Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Cognitive Assessment Battery (CAB): a rapid test of cognitive domains

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 January 2011

Arto Nordlund ,
Lisbeth Påhlsson ,
Christina Holmberg ,
Karin Lind  and
Anders Wallin
Arto Nordlund*
Affiliation:
Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy at Gothenburg University, Mölndal, Sweden
Lisbeth Påhlsson
Affiliation:
Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy at Gothenburg University, Mölndal, Sweden
Christina Holmberg
Affiliation:
Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy at Gothenburg University, Mölndal, Sweden
Karin Lind
Affiliation:
Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy at Gothenburg University, Mölndal, Sweden
Anders Wallin
Affiliation:
Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy at Gothenburg University, Mölndal, Sweden
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: Arto Nordlund, Sahlgrenska Academy, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Wallinsgatan 6, SE 431 41 Mölndal, Sweden. Phone: +46 31 343 8698. Email: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background: The study aimed to evaluate the Cognitive Assessment Battery (CAB) in a specialist clinic setting in order to find out if it if it could be a supplement to the Mini-mental State Examination (MMSE) and distinguish between normal aging, mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia, as well as MCI of different severities.

Methods: CAB consists of six short tests covering the cognitive domains of speed/attention, episodic memory, visuospatial functions, language and executive functions. It takes about 20 minutes to carry out and provides a quick overview of the patient's cognitive profile. Three groups were compared: healthy controls (N = 41), MCI (N = 83) and mild dementia (N = 28).

Results: CAB distinguished very clearly between controls and MCI as well as MCI and dementia. On further analysis CAB also distinguished between MCI of different severities. It also showed to have good sensitivity and specificity for identifying more severe MCI.

Conclusions: CAB seems to be a useful supplement to MMSE and a screening instrument for MCI and dementia with good sensitivity and specificity.

Keywords

cognitive assessmentMCIdementiaAlzheimer's diseasevascular dementia
Type
Research Article
Information
International Psychogeriatrics , Volume 23 , Issue 7 , September 2011 , pp. 1144 - 1151
Copyright
Copyright © International Psychogeriatric Association 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alexopoulos, P., Grimmer, T., Perneczky, R., Domes, G. and Kurz, A. (2006). Progression to dementia in clinical subtypes of mild cognitive impairment. Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders, 22, 27–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
American Psychiatric Association (1987). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 3rd edn (revised). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
Eriksson, L., Johansson, E., Kettaneh-Wold, N., Wikström, C. and Wold, S. (2002). User's Guide to Simca-P. Umeå, Sweden: Umetrics AB.Google Scholar
Fleisher, A. S., Sowell, B. B., Taylor, C., Gamst, A. C., Petersen, R. C. and Thal, L. J. (2007). Clinical predictors of progression to Alzheimer disease in amnestic mild cognitive impairment. Neurology, 68, 1588–1595.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E. and McHugh, P. R. (1975). “Mini-mental state”: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12, 189–198.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frisoni, G. B., Galluzzi, S., Bresciani, L., Zanetti, O. and Geroldi, C. (2002). Mild cognitive impairment with subcortical vascular features: clinical characteristics and outcome. Journal of Neurology, 249, 1423–1432.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaplan, E. G. and H; Weintraub, S (1983). The Boston Naming Test (2nd edn). Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger.Google Scholar
Kluger, A., Ferris, S. H., Golomb, J., Mittelman, M. S. and Reisberg, B. (1999). Neuropsychological prediction of decline to dementia in nondemented elderly. Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology, 12, 168–179.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Libon, D. J., Swenson, R. A., Barnoski, E. J. and Sands, L. P. (1993). Clock drawing as an assessment tool for dementia. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 8, 405–415.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meyer, J. S., Xu, G., Thornby, J., Chowdhury, M. H. and Quach, M. (2002). Is mild cognitive impairment prodromal for vascular dementia like Alzheimer's disease? Stroke, 33, 1981–1985.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mitchell, J., Arnold, R., Dawson, K., Nestor, P. J. and Hodges, J. R. (2009). Outcome in subgroups of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is highly predictable using a simple algorithm. Journal of Neurology, 256, 1500–1509.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morris, J. C. (1997). Clinical dementia rating: a reliable and valid diagnostic and staging measure for dementia of the Alzheimer type. International Psychogeriatrics, 9 (Suppl. 1), 173–178.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nasreddine, Z. S. et al. (2005). The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 53, 695–699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nielsen, N. P., Wiig, E. H., Warkentin, S. and Minthon, L. (2004). Clinical utility of color-form naming in Alzheimer's disease: preliminary evidence. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 99, 1201–1204.Google ScholarPubMed
Nordlund, A., Rolstad, S., Hellstrom, P., Sjogren, M., Hansen, S. and Wallin, A. (2005). The Goteborg MCI study: mild cognitive impairment is a heterogeneous condition. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 76, 1485–1490.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nordlund, A., Rolstad, S., Klang, O., Lind, K., Hansen, S. and Wallin, A. (2007). Cognitive profiles of mild cognitive impairment with and without vascular disease. Neuropsychology, 21, 706–712.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nordlund, A., Rolstad, S., Klang, O., Edman, A., Hansen, S. and Wallin, A. (2010). Two-year outcome of MCI subtypes and aetiologies in the Goteborg MCI study. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 81, 541–546.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Palmer, K., Backman, L., Winblad, B. and Fratiglioni, L. (2008). Mild cognitive impairment in the general population: occurrence and progression to Alzheimer disease. American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 16, 603–611.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Petersen, R. C., Smith, G. E., Waring, S. C., Ivnik, R. J., Kokmen, E. and Tangelos, E. G. (1997). Aging, memory, and mild cognitive impairment. International Psychogeriatrics, 9 (Suppl. 1), 65–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Petersen, R. C., Smith, G. E., Waring, S. C., Ivnik, R. J., Tangalos, E. G. and Kokmen, E. (1999). Mild cognitive impairment: clinical characterization and outcome. Archives of Neurology, 56, 303–308.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reisberg, B., Ferris, S. H., de Leon, M. J. and Crook, T. (1988). Global Deterioration Scale (GDS). Psychopharmacology Bulletin, 24, 661–663.Google ScholarPubMed
Rolstad, S., Nordlund, A., Eckerstrom, C., Gustavsson, M. H., Zetterberg, H. and Wallin, A. (2009). Biomarkers in relation to cognitive reserve in patients with mild cognitive impairment: proof of concept. Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders, 27, 194–200.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Royall, D. R., Mahurin, R. K. and Gray, K. F. (1992). Bedside assessment of executive cognitive impairment: the executive interview. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 40, 1221–1226.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spreen, O. and Strauss, E. (1998). A Compendium of Neuropsychological Tests. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stern, Y. (2003). The concept of cognitive reserve: a catalyst for research. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 25, 589–593.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tabert, M. H. et al. (2006). Neuropsychological prediction of conversion to Alzheimer disease in patients with mild cognitive impairment. Archives of General Psychiatry, 63, 916–924.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taler, V. and Phillips, N. A. (2008). Language performance in Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment: a comparative review. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 30, 501–556.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Talwalker, S., Overall, J. E., Srirama, M. K. and Gracon, S. I. (1996). Cardinal features of cognitive dysfunction in Alzheimer's disease: a factor-analytic study of the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale. Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology, 9, 39–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taylor, R. (1998). Indices of neuropsychological functioning and decline over time in dementia. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 27, 165–170.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wallin, A. et al. (1996). Stepwise comparative status analysis (STEP): a tool for identification of regional brain syndromes in dementia. Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology, 9, 185–199.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Welsh, K. A. et al. (1994). The Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease (CERAD). Part V. A normative study of the neuropsychological battery. Neurology, 44, 609–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wimo, A., Winblad, B. and Jonsson, L. (2007). An estimate of the total worldwide societal costs of dementia in 2005. Alzheimer's and Dementia, 3, 81–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Winblad, B. et al. (2004). Mild cognitive impairment: beyond controversies, towards a consensus. Report of the International Working Group on Mild Cognitive Impairment. Journal of Internal Medicine, 256, 240–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar