Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T18:09:09.641Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Behavioral Disorders and Caregivers' Reaction in Taiwanese Patients With Alzheimer's Disease

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 January 2005

Jong-Ling Fuh ,
Ching-Kuan Liu ,
Michael S. Mega ,
Shuu-Jiun Wang  and
Jeffrey L. Cummings
Jong-Ling Fuh
Affiliation:
Neurological Institute, Vetereans General Hospital-Taipei and National Yang-Ming University Schools of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan
Ching-Kuan Liu
Affiliation:
Department of Neurology, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan Graduate Institute of Behavioral Sciences, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
Michael S. Mega
Affiliation:
Department of Neurology, UCLA School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, USA
Shuu-Jiun Wang
Affiliation:
Neurological Institute, Vetereans General Hospital-Taipei and National Yang-Ming University Schools of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan
Jeffrey L. Cummings
Affiliation:
Department of Neurology, UCLA School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, USA Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, UCLA School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the applicability of the Chinese version of the Neuropsychiatric Inventory Scale (NPI), and to explore the neuropsychiatric manifestations of Taiwanese patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) and caregiver distress. Method: The Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) was administered to 95 patients with AD, and their caregivers were interviewed with the NPI. To assess the test-retest reliability of the Chinese version of the NPI, 86 caregivers underwent a second NPI 3 weeks later. Results: The Cronbach's alpha coefficient of the Chinese version of the NPI was .76. The test-rest reliabilities of frequency, severity, and caregiver burden scores were significantly correlated; overall correlations were .85 for frequency (p < .001), .82 for severity (p < .001), and .79 (p < .001) for distress. Factor analysis was carried out, and three groups, “mood and psychosis,” “psychomotor regulation,” and “social engagement,” were found. Aberrant motor behavior was the most frequently recorded behavior; euphoria was the least. There was no significant correlation between the patient's MMSE and the caregiver distress score, except for aberrant motor activity (r = −.23, p = .03). The symptoms most frequently reported to be severely distressing to caregivers were aberrant motor activity, anxiety, agitation, and delusions. Conclusions: These results indicate that the NPI is a reliable tool to assess behavioral disturbance and caregiver distress in Taiwanese AD patients. These findings also confirm the high prevalence of psychopathology among AD patients and the marked distress produced by many of these behaviors.

Type
Articles
Information
International Psychogeriatrics , Volume 13 , Issue 1 , March 2001 , pp. 121 - 128
Copyright
© 2001 International Psychogeriatric Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)