Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T01:58:11.107Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

536 - Moderating effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on the efficacy of cognitive stimulation. A controlled trial.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 November 2021

Mª Concepción Gurbindo-Elizari
Affiliation:
Nurse, Servicio Navarro de Salud, Pamplona, Spain.
Blanca Martínez-Martínez
Affiliation:
Occupational Therapist, Servicio Navarro de Salud, Pamplona, Spain.
J. Antonio Garcia-Casal
Affiliation:
Clinical Psychologist, Servicio Navarro de Salud, IdiSNA, Pamplona, Spain.
Fernando Gómez-Gil
Affiliation:
Nurse, Servicio Navarro de Salud, Pamplona, Spain.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Background:

It´s been proved that cognitive stimulation (CS) has direct effects over the improvement of general cognitive functions in people with cognitive impairment (PCI). The restrictions in daily life associated to COVID-19 pandemic had an impact in the quality of life of PCI and it might have affected the efficacy of the CS programs targeting this population.

Research Objective:

To analyse if there was a moderating effect of the pandemic on the efficacy of CS programs.

Method:

Participants were enrolled in a public memory clinic; 213 PCI were assigned to two groups: 173 received CS treatment before the pandemic (PRECOVID) and 40 received CS during the pandemic (COVID). Pre and post assessments were carried out with the Mini Mental State Exam (MMSE), the clock-test and the brief Geriatric Depression Scale. The treatment consisted of 32 sessions of CS held twice a week during 4 months. No significant differences (p<.05) were found between groups at baseline in age (74.46±7.80 years), cognitive function (MMSE=23.43±3.30), gender (58% women) and the remaining variables.

Preliminary results of the ongoing study:

After treatment, both samples improved in depression (t = 4.56, p < .05), the COVID group improved in MMSE (t = -3.40, p < .05) and clock-test (t= -3.78, p < .05), the rest of the changes were not significant. Between group effect sizes favoured the COVID group intervention for MMSE (dc = 0.74) and the clock test (dc = 0.48). No between group differences were found for depression (dc = -0.48).

Conclusions:

Older people participating of CS during the pandemic benefited more from the treatment than those participating before the pandemic. This apparently contradictory result might be explained by the context of lack of social, emotional and cognitive stimulation associated to the restrictions inherent to social confinement. The continuity of CS care to PCI is essential in the context of generalised restrictions in daily life associated to COVID-19 pandemic and might play an important role in preventing cognitive loss and associated disabilities.

Type
OnDemand Poster
Copyright
© International Psychogeriatric Association 2021