Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T05:33:01.711Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The yield from national surveys of mental health

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Scott Henderson
Affiliation:
John Curtin School of Medical Research, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia, email [email protected]
Gavin Andrews
Affiliation:
School of Psychiatry, UNSW at St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, NSW, 2010, Australia
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

At least 21 countries have now carried out national surveys of mental health under the aegis of the World Health Organization's World Mental Health Surveys. This has meant interviewing some 157 000 people in their homes. The countries are as varied as Australia, China, Iran, six continental European nations, Nigeria, the UK and the USA (Andrews et al, 2001; Demyttenaere et al, 2004; Mohammadi et al, 2005). It is therefore timely to consider what this very large body of information has yielded and to what use it can be put, especially in relation to the costs and human resources expended in a field where unmet need is so conspicuous.

Type
Original Papers
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits noncommercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal College of Psychiatrists 2008

References

American Psychiatric Association (1994) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th edn) (DSM–IV). American Psychiatric Press.Google Scholar
Andrews, G., Henderson, S. & Hall, W. (2001) Prevalence, comorbidity disability and service utilisation. Overview of the Australian National Mental Health Survey. British Journal of Psychiatry, 17, 145153.Google Scholar
Compton, W. M., Conway, K. P., Stinson, F. S., et al (2006) Changes in the prevalence of major depression and comorbid substance use disorders in the United States between 1991–1992 and 2001–2002. American Journal of Psychiatry, 163, 21412147.Google Scholar
Demyttenaere, K., Bruffaerts, R., Posada-Villa, J., et al (World Mental Health Survey Consortium) (2004) Prevalence, severity, and unmet need for treatment of mental disorders in the World Health Organization World Mental Health Surveys. JAMA, 291, 25812590.Google Scholar
Goldberg, D. P. & Williams, P. A. (1988) User's Guide to the GHQ. NFER Nelson.Google Scholar
Kessel, N. (1965) Are international comparisons timely? Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly, 2, 199212.Google Scholar
Kessler, R. C., Andrews, G., Colpe, L. J., et al (2002) Short screening scales to monitor population prevalences and trends in non-specific psychological distress. Psychological Medicine, 32, 959976.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mohammadi, M–R., Davidian, A., Noobala, A. A., et al (2005) An epidemiological survey of psychiatric disorders in Iran. Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health, 1, 1623.Google Scholar
Rose, G. (1993) Mental disorders and the strategies of prevention. Psychological Medicine, 23, 553555.Google Scholar
World Health Organization (1992) The ICD–10 Classification of Mental and Behavioural Disorders. Diagnostic Criteria for Research. WHO.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.