Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T02:13:22.918Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The need to reform mental health legislation in Commonwealth countries

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Soumitra Pathare
Affiliation:
Centre for Mental Health Law and Policy, Indian Law Society, Pune, India, email [email protected] Mental Health Law and Policy Action Lab (Indian Law Society and VU University Amsterdam collaboration), Pune, India
Laura Shields
Affiliation:
Mental Health Law and Policy Action Lab (Indian Law Society and VU University Amsterdam collaboration), Pune, India Athena Institute, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Jaya Sagade
Affiliation:
Centre for Mental Health Law and Policy, Indian Law Society, Pune, India, email [email protected] Mental Health Law and Policy Action Lab (Indian Law Society and VU University Amsterdam collaboration), Pune, India
Renuka Nardodkar
Affiliation:
Centre for Mental Health Law and Policy, Indian Law Society, Pune, India, email [email protected] Mental Health Law and Policy Action Lab (Indian Law Society and VU University Amsterdam collaboration), Pune, India
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) serves as a comprehensive and legally binding framework for the rights of persons with mental illness. The extent to which countries have adapted their mental health legislation to reflect the binding provisions outlined in the CRPD is unclear. This paper reviews the situation across the Commonwealth.

Type
Guest editorial
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits noncommercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists 2014

References

Kumar, T. C. R., John, S., Gopal, S., et al (2013) Psychiatric advance statements: an Indian experience. International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 59, 531534 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mendez, J. (2013) Report of the Special Rapporteur on Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment A/HRC/22/53. United Nations Human Rights Council. Available at http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/HRBodies/HRCouncil/RegularSession/Session22/A.HRC22.53_English.pdf (accessed 10 July 2013).Google ScholarPubMed
Pathare, S. & Sagade, J. (2013) Mental Health: A Legislative Framework to Empower, Protect and Care. A Review of Mental Health Legislation in Commonwealth Member States. Commonwealth Health Professions Alliance, Commonwealth Foundation.Google Scholar
UN General Assembly (1991) Principles for the Protection of Persons with Mental Illness and the Improvement of Mental Health Care. Adopted on 17 December 1991 by Resolution A/RES/46/119. Available at http://www.un.org/documents/ga/res/46/a46r119.htm (accessed 10 July 2013).Google Scholar
UN General Assembly (2006) Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and Optional Protocol. Adopted on 13 December 2006 by Resolution A/RES/61/106. Available at http://www.un.org/disabilities/documents/convention/convoptprot-e.pdf (accessed 1 July 2013).Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.