Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-hvd4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-07T21:03:04.867Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Leadership, decision-making and errors: cultural factors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Dinesh Bhugra  and
Susham Gupta
Dinesh Bhugra
Affiliation:
Mental Health and Cultural Diversity, Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, UK, email [email protected]
Susham Gupta
Affiliation:
East London Foundation NHS Trust, Assertive Outreach Team — City and Hackney, London, UK
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

As clinicians, we are used to making often fast and life-altering decisions. As professionals, the clinical decisions we make depend upon our training, knowledge base, supervision, expertise and experience. Sociodemographic factors such as age, gender, ethnicity and cultural background can also influence our views. However, rarely do we step back to think about the mental processes behind our decision-making. In cognitive–behavioural therapy and in our general dealings with patients, we aim to help them identify their cognitive schema and attribution errors as a way forward; but we rarely reflect on our own cognitive schema and possible misattribution in making decisions. Both patients and healthcare professionals are affected by cultural norms, mores and expectations.

Type
Guest Editorial
Information
International Psychiatry , Volume 7 , Issue 2 , April 2010 , pp. 27 - 29
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits noncommercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal College of Psychiatrists 2010

References

Firth-Cozens, J. (2006a) A perspective on stress and depression. In Under standing Doctors' Performance (eds Cox, J., King, J., Hutchinson, A., et al), pp. 22–37. Radcliffe.Google Scholar
Firth-Cozens, J. (2006b) Leadership and the quality of health care. In Under standing Doctors' Performance (eds Cox, J., King, J., Hutchinson, A., et al), pp. 122–133. Radcliffe.Google Scholar
Ghodse, H. & Galea, S. (2006) Misuse of drugs and alcohol. In Understanding Doctors' Performance (eds Cox, J., King, J., Hutchinson, A., et al), pp. 38–47. Radcliffe.Google Scholar
Gibson, K., Kartsounis, L. & Kopelman, M. (2006) Cognitive impairment and performance. In Understanding Doctors' Performance (eds Cox, J., King, J., Hutchinson, A., et al), pp. 48–60. Radcliffe.Google Scholar
Harvard Business School Press (2006) Decision Making: 5 Steps to Better Results. Harvard Business Essentials. Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Kotter, J. P. (1998) What Leaders Really Do (Harvard Business Review Book Series). Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Mach, E. (1905) Knowledge and Error (trans. 1976). Reidel.Google Scholar
Newell, B. R., Lagnado, D. A. & Shanks, D. R. (2007) Straight Choices: The Psychology of Decision Making. Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Reason, J. (1990) Human Error. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Yates, J., Veinott, E. & Patalamo, A. (2003) Hard decisions, bad decisions. In Emerging Perspectives on Judgement and Decision Research (eds Schneider, S. L. & Shanteau, J.), pp. 13–63. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.