Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T04:56:08.673Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The cross-cultural sensitivity of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ): a comparative analysis of Gujarati and British children

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Manasi Kumar  and
Peter Fonagy
Manasi Kumar
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, University of Nairobi, Kenya, email [email protected]
Peter Fonagy
Affiliation:
Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK, email [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) may be considered a reliable measure of child behaviour, social functioning and adjustment in an Indian Gujarati context. The sample comprised 351 children who were classified as coming from a ‘poverty’ or ‘non-poverty’ background. The means and standard deviations for the SDQ total and five behavioural scales, as rated by children themselves, were first calculated for the entire Gujarati sample, then for the poverty and non-poverty subgroups. The SDQ did prove to be an appropriate measure for behavioural assessment. Its cross-cultural sensitivity was ascertained by comparing it against a British normative population. Small effect sizes were seen in the Emotional subscale scores and scores for total difficulties, and medium and large effect sizes on the Prosocial and Peer subscales, respectively, with greater difficulties experienced by the Indian Gujarati sample than their British counterparts.

Type
Research Paper
Information
International Psychiatry , Volume 10 , Issue 2 , May 2013 , pp. 42 - 45
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits noncommercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists 2013

References

Balaban, V. (2006) Psychological assessment of children in disasters and emergencies. Disasters, 30, 178–198.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Birbili, M. (2000) Translating from one language to another. Social Science Update: Issue 31. University of Surrey. Available at http://sru.soc.surrey.ac.uk/SRU31.html (accessed January 2013).Google Scholar
Goodman, R. (1997) The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: a research note. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 38, 581–596.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goodman, R. (2002) SDQ information website, http://www.sdqinfo.com (accessed January 2013).Google Scholar
Goodman, R. & Scott, S. (1999) Comparing the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire and the Child Behaviour Checklist: is small beautiful? Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 27, 17–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goodman, A., Hieverbang, E., Fleitlich-Bilyk, B., et al (2012) Cross-national differences in questionnaire do not necessarily reflect comparable differences in disorder prevalence. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 47, 1321–1331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klasen, H., Woerner, W., Wolke, D., et al (2000) Comparing the German versions of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ-Deu) and the Child Behaviour Checklist. European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 9, 271–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mullick, M. & Goodman, R. (2001) Questionnaire screening for mental health problems in Bangladeshi children: a preliminary study. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 36, 94–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prior, M., Virasinghe, S. & Smart, D. (2005) Behavioural problems in Sri Lankan schoolchildren: associations with socio-economic status, age, gender, academic progress, ethnicity and religion. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 40, 654–662.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shweder, R. A., Mohapatra, M. & Miller, J. G. (1987) Culture and moral development. In The Emergence of Morality in Young Children (eds Kagan, J. & Lamb, S.), pp. 1–83. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.