Hostname: page-component-5f745c7db-tvc9f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-06T11:18:37.056Z Has data issue: true hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Community treatment orders in New Zealand

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

John Dawson
John Dawson*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Law, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand, email [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Many legal mechanisms can be used to authorise compulsory community mental healthcare: leave or conditional discharge for compulsory in-patients; adult guardianship (or incapacity) legislation; treatment as a condition of a community-based criminal sentence, like probation, or of parole from imprisonment; or a full-fledged community treatment order (CTO) scheme. It is the specific mix of mechanisms employed in a particular jurisdiction that will characterise how that legal system manages the delivery of compulsory (or quasi-consensual) community psychiatric care.

Type
Thematic Paper
Information
International Psychiatry , Volume 6 , Issue 3 , July 2009 , pp. 59 - 60
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits noncommercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal College of Psychiatrists 2009

References

Churchill, R., Owen, G., Singh, S., et al (2007) International Experience of Using Community Treatment Orders. Institute of Psychiatry.Google Scholar
Dawson, J. (2005) Community Treatment Orders: International Comparisons. Otago University Print (http://www.otago.ac.nz/law/otagoCTO/index.html).Google Scholar
Dawson, J. (2006) Fault-lines in community treatment order legislation. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 29, 482–494.Google Scholar
Dawson, J. & Romans, S. (2001) Use of community treatment orders in New Zealand: early findings. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 35, 190–195.Google Scholar
Gibbs, A., Dawson, J., Ansley, C., et al (2005) How patients in New Zealand view community treatment orders. Journal of Mental Health, 14, 357–368.Google Scholar
Lewis, A. (1953) Health as a social concept. British Journal of Sociology, 4, 109–124.Google Scholar
Mullen, R., Dawson, J. & Gibbs, A. (2006a) Dilemmas for clinicians in use of community treatment orders. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 29, 535–550.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mullen, R., Gibbs, A. & Dawson, J. (2006b) Family perspective on community treatment orders: a New Zealand study. International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 52, 469–478.Google Scholar
Office of the Director of Mental Heath (2008) Annual Report 2007. Ministry of Health.Google Scholar
Romans, S., Dawson, J., Mullen, R., et al (2004) How mental health clinicians view community treatment orders: a national New Zealand survey. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 38, 836–841.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.