Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T05:35:47.487Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

World Bank: Documents Concerning the Establishment of the Global Environment Facility

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2017

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Other Documents
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

* [Reproduced from the text provided toInternational LegaT Materials by the World Bank. The Executive Directors of the World Bank adopted Resolution No. 91-5 on the Global Environment Facility, 30 I.L.M. 1758 (1991), on March 14, 1991. The agreements on procedural arrangements at 30 I.L.M. 1766, 1770, and 1773 (1991) are reproduced from the signed documents which indicate the dates they entered into effect.

[The Vienna Convention for the Protection of the Ozone Layer and Its Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer appear at 26 I.L.M. 1516 and 1541 (1987); amendments and adjustments to the Montreal Protocol appear at 30 I.L.M. 537 (1991).]

1/ These were Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, The Netherlands, Norway, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom, and the United Sutes. New Zealand joined at the second meeting.

2/ These were Brazil, China, Cote d'lvoire, India, Mexico, Morocco, and Zimbabwe.

* [The Barcelona Convention and 3 of the 4 protocols appear at 15 I.L.M. 290 (1976), 15 I.L.M. 300 (1976), 15 I.L.M. 306 (1976) and 19 I.L.M. 809 (1980)

* [See 30 I.L.M. 550 (1991)]

1/ Based on average exchange rates for the three-month period ending September 30, 1990.

2/ Depending on the distribution of loans under the normal terms of cofinancing from Japan, the grant equivalent (based on staff estimates) would fall within a range of SDR 90-110 million.

1/ The instrument is to be signed on behalf of the Government by a duly authorized representative thereof.