No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
United States: Decisions Concerning Carbon Steel Imports*
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 March 2017
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Judicial and Similar Proceedings
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © American Society of International Law 1982
Footnotes
*
[The Introductory Note was prepared for International Legal Materials by Peter D. Ehrenhaft of Hughes Hubbard & Reed and a member of the I.L.M. Editorial Advisory Committee.
[The materials reproduced appear in the order in which they are discussed in the Introductory Note. The I.L.M. page numbers appear in the margin. The press briefing by the U.S. Secretary of Commerce concerning the settlement precedes the document terminating the countervailing duty and antidumping investigations, at I.L.M. page 1422.]
References
* Nevertheless, the U.S. industry requested that the I.L.M. p investigation continue. 47 Fed. Reg. 47707 (Oct. 27, 1982).
1 Amended from 12 Inches In the initiation notice.
2 Initiation notice amended by adding after thickness “and over 12 inches in width.”
1 Amended from 12 inches in the initiation notice.
2 Initiation notice amended by adding after thickness “and over 12 inches in width.”
3 Vary by conaurnpaon.
* [The press briefing by the U.S. Secretary of Commerce concerning the settlement appears at I.L.M. page 1422.
[The list of countervailing duty and antidumping petitions withdrawn appears in Appendix I at I.L.M. page 1428. Product definitions appear in Appendix II at I.L.M. page 1429. The Arrangement between the European Coal and Steel Community and the United States, concluded on October 21, 1982, appears in Appendix III at I.L.M. page 1429.]
1 To the extent that the Arrangement products are subject to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community (the EEC), the term “ECSC” should be substituted by “EEC”.
2 With respect to any Section 337 investigation, the parties shall consult to determine the basis for the investigation.
1 For purposes of this Arrangement, the term “petitions” covers all matters included in the petitions filed on the dates listed, whether or not the DOC initiated investigations on the products or countries concerned.
1 Subject to further verfications and amendments to be J upon by experts of both parties before 1st November 1982.
2 Covered if hot rotted.
3 Covered if over 12” in width.
4 Excluding semifinished products over 6 inches in thickness produced by rotting on a primary (slabbing) mill.
5 I Covered If structural shapes.
6 Covered if coiled bar from 13 to 18.8 mm olameter.
7 Covered if contains up to 0.35 percent lead or sulfur.
8 Excluding coiled bar from 13 to 18.8 mm diameter.
9 Not covered if coated, plated or clad.
10 Excluded if cold finished.
11 Covered if hot rolled bar, excluding coiled bar from 13 to 18.8 mm diameter.
12 Covered if hot rolled bar.
13 Covered if hot rolled bar, and 0.35 percent or more lead or sulfur.
1 Excluding semifinished products over 6 inches in thickness produced by rolling on a primary (slabbing) mill.
* [Reproduced with the permission of the Bureau of National Affairs, publisher of the International Trade Regulation Decisions.
[The U.S. Customs Court Act of 1980, Public Law 96-417 of October 10, 1980, establishing the Court of International Trade, appears at 20 I.L.M. 250 (1981). Excerpts from the House of Representatives Report which discuss the purpose, background, and the provisions of the Act concerning jurisdiction and procedures appear at 20 I.L.M. 261 (1981).]
* [Reproduced with the permission of the Bureau of National Affairs, publisher of the International Trade Regulation Decisions.]
1 (c) Limited disclosure of certain confidential information under protective order.
(1) Disclosure by administering authority or commission.
(A) In general. Upon receipt of an application, which describes with particularity the information requested and sets forth the reasons for the request, the administering authority and the Commission may make confidential information submitted by any other party to the investigation available under a protective order described in subparagraph (B).
(B) Protective order. The protective order under which information is made available shall contain such requirements as the administering authority or the Commission may determine by regulation to be appropriate. The administering authority and the Commission shall provide by regulation for such sanctions as the administering authority and the Commission determine to be appropriate, including disbarment from practice before the agency.
2 The DOC does not propose to release certain’ of the exhibits, the computer tapes, printouts derived from the tapes and names of customers.
3 The statute, at 19 U.S.C. §1677f(b)(1) permits the agencies in these investigations to require the parallel submission of the nonconfidential summary “in sufficient detail to permit a reasonable understanding of the substance of the information submitted in confidence.. ..”
4 Defendanl-Iniervenors Bethlehem and Armco's Exhibit 5 at D page 2.
5 Exhibit A, Annex: D.l.l.
6 Exhibit C to Affidavit of Pierre F. deRavel d’Esclapon and Exhibit F-l and F-2 to .Supplemental Affidavit of John A. Young (filed September 13, 1982)