Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T09:19:50.633Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

United Nations Commission on International Trade Law: Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 March 2017

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Legislation and Regulations
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

* Article headings are for reference purposes only and are not to be used for purposes of interpretation.

** The term “commercial” should be given a wide interpretation so as to cover matters arising from all relationships of a commercial nature, whether contractual or not. Relationships of a commercial nature include, but are not limited to, the following transactions: any trade transaction for the supply or exchange of goods or services; distribution agreement; commercial representation or agency; factoring; leasing; construction of works; consulting; engineering; licensing; investment; financing; banking; insurance; exploitation agreement or concession; joint venture and other forms of industrial or business co-operation; carriage of goods or passengers by air , sea, rail or road.

* [Reproduced from the Report of the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law on the work of its eighteenth session (June 3-21, 1985), U.N. General Assembly, Official Records, Fortieth Session, Supplement No. 17 (A/40/17), Annex I, pp. 81-93.

[Chapter II of the UNCITRAL Report gives the legislative history of the model law. It has been reproduced at I.L.M. page 1314.]

*** The conditions set forth in this paragraph are intended to set maximum standards. It would, thus, not be contrary to the harmonization to be achieved by the model law if a State retained even less onerous conditions.