Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T10:34:44.389Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

United Kingdom: Court of Appeal Decision with Regard to the Taking of Evidence in the United Kingdom for Use in Westinghouse Uranium Litigation in U.S. District Court*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 March 2017

Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Judicial and Similar Proceedings
Information
International Legal Materials , Volume 16 , Issue 4 , July 1977 , pp. 784 - 802
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

[Reprinted from the text provided to International Legal Materials by the U.S. Department of Justice.

[This decision addresses the question of securing evidence for use by the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia in a dispute between Westinghouse and various public utility companies concerning the supply of uranium. The question of the existence of a uranium cartel and its influence on the market is at issue.

[The Hague Convention on the Taking of Evidence Abroad in Civil and Commercial Matters appears at 8 I.L.M. 37 (1969) and the U.S. Delegation Report on the Convention appears at 8 I.L.M. 804 (1969).

[On July 12, 1977, the U.S. Attorney General granted seven executives of Rio Tinto-Zinc immunity from prosecution in U.S. Courts, as they had previously declined to provide evidence by invoking the Fifth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. As of July 25, 1977, efforts were under way to appeal the Court of Appeal decision on the taking of evidence to the House of Lords, the highest court in the United Kingdom.

[The so-called uranium cartel's rules for orderly marketing of uranium appear at I.L.M. page 988. The memorandum and articles of association of the Uranium Institute, established in 1975, appear at I.L.M. page 1000.]

References

* [Reprinted from the text provided to International Legal Materials by the U.S. Department of Justice.

[This decision addresses the question of securing evidence for use by the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia in a dispute between Westinghouse and various public utility companies concerning the supply of uranium. The question of the existence of a uranium cartel and its influence on the market is at issue.

[The Hague Convention on the Taking of Evidence Abroad in Civil and Commercial Matters appears at 8 I.L.M. 37 (1969) and the U.S. Delegation Report on the Convention appears at 8 I.L.M. 804 (1969).

[On July 12, 1977, the U.S. Attorney General granted seven executives of Rio Tinto-Zinc immunity from prosecution in U.S. Courts, as they had previously declined to provide evidence by invoking the Fifth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. As of July 25, 1977, efforts were under way to appeal the Court of Appeal decision on the taking of evidence to the House of Lords, the highest court in the United Kingdom.

[The so-called uranium cartel's rules for orderly marketing of uranium appear at I.L.M. page 988. The memorandum and articles of association of the Uranium Institute, established in 1975, appear at I.L.M. page 1000.]