Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T22:37:18.686Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

International Court of Justice: Nicaraguan Applications in Border and Transborder Armed Actions*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 May 2017

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Judicial and Similar Proceedings
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

[Reproduced from the text provided by the International Court of Justice. The Application instituting proceedings against Honduras appears at I.L.M. page 1293. Both Costa Rica and Honduras have appointed agents to represent them in the proceedings brought by Nicaragua.In a communication of August 12, 1986, the Government of Costa Rica advised the Court of the appointment and indicated that Costa Rica reserves the right to present a counter-claim against Honduras notified the Court of its agent and expressed the hope that the Court would confine all preliminary pleadings exclusively to the issue of jurisdiction and admissibility.

[The Court's Judgment in Nicaragua v. United States appears at I.L.M. page 1023. Excerpts from the U.N. Security Council discussion of that Judgment appear at I.L.M. page 1337.]

References

* [Reproduced from the text provided by the International Court of Justice. The Application instituting proceedings against Honduras appears at I.L.M. page 1293. Both Costa Rica and Honduras have appointed agents to represent them in the proceedings brought by Nicaragua.In a communication of August 12, 1986, the Government of Costa Rica advised the Court of the appointment and indicated that Costa Rica reserves the right to present a counter-claim against Honduras notified the Court of its agent and expressed the hope that the Court would confine all preliminary pleadings exclusively to the issue of jurisdiction and admissibility.

[The Court's Judgment in Nicaragua v. United States appears at I.L.M. page 1023. Excerpts from the U.N. Security Council discussion of that Judgment appear at I.L.M. page 1337.]