No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 March 2017
[Reproduced from the text provided by the International Court of Justice.
[The Judgment was unanimous, with Judges Morozov, Oda and Schwebel appending separate opinions. Those opinions appear respectively at I.L.M. pages 579, 579 and 585.
[Malta's application for permission to intervene, filed with the Court on January 30, 1981, appears at 20 I.L.M. 329 (1981). The Special Agreement between Tunisia and Libya to submit the case to the I.C.J, appears at 18 I.L.M. 51 (1979). The I.C.J. Order on the time limits for the written proceedings, signed June 3, 1980, appears at 19 I.L.M. 964 (1980). In accord with Article 4 of the Special Agreement, at the request of either Party, additional written pleadings can be submitted to the Court and exchanged within periods to be fixed by the Court. In the Court's Order of April 16, 1981, July 15, 1981, is fixed as the time-limit for the filing of the additional written replies.]
* [Reproduced from the text provided by the International Court of Justice.
[The Judgment was unanimous, with Judges Morozov, Oda and Schwebel appending separate opinions. Those opinions appear respectively at I.L.M. pages 579, 579 and 585.
[Malta's application for permission to intervene, filed with the Court on January 30, 1981, appears at 20 I.L.M. 329 (1981). The Special Agreement between Tunisia and Libya to submit the case to the I.C.J, appears at 18 I.L.M. 51 (1979). The I.C.J. Order on the time limits for the written proceedings, signed June 3, 1980, appears at 19 I.L.M. 964 (1980). In accord with Article 4 of the Special Agreement, at the request of either Party, additional written pleadings can be submitted to the Court and exchanged within periods to be fixed by the Court. In the Court's Order of April 16, 1981, July 15, 1981, is fixed as the time-limit for the filing of the additional written replies.]