Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-grxwn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-05T13:26:20.095Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

International Court of Justice: Fisheries Jurisdiction Case (United Kingdom v. Iceland) Order Concerning The Continuance of Interim Measures of Protection*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 March 2017

Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Judicial and Similar Proceedings
Information
International Legal Materials , Volume 12 , Issue 4 , July 1973 , pp. 743 - 748
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

[Reproduced from the text provided to International Legal Materials by the International Court of Justice.

[The Court issued a similar Order in the Fisheries Jurisdiction Case instituted against Iceland by the Federal Republic of Germany. The language of that Order and Judge Ignacio-Pinto1s declaration and Judge Petrén’s dissenting opinion was virtually the same as in United Kingdom v. Iceland; therefore, they have not been reproduced. The dissenting opinion of Judge Gros follows his dissenting opinion in United Kingdom v. Iceland at page 747.

[The Court’s Order of August 17, 1972, concerning interim measures of protection, appears at 11 I.L.M. 1069 (1972). The Court’s Judgment of February 2, 1973, concerning the question of jurisdiction, appears at 12 I.L.M. 290 (1973).

[The 1961 Agreement between Iceland and the United Kingdom on fishing in Icelandic waters appears at 11 I.L.M. 490 (1972). The Icelandic Al-thing Resolution on fisheries jurisdiction, dated February 15, 1972, appears at 11 I.L.M. 643 (1972). Icelandic regulations concerning fishery limits, dated July 14, 1972, appear at 11 I.L.M. 1112 (1972). An agreement between Belgium and Iceland on fishing within a fifty-mile limit appears at 11 I.L.M. 941 (1972).]

References

* [Reproduced from the text provided to International Legal Materials by the International Court of Justice.

[The Court issued a similar Order in the Fisheries Jurisdiction Case instituted against Iceland by the Federal Republic of Germany. The language of that Order and Judge Ignacio-Pinto1s declaration and Judge Petrén’s dissenting opinion was virtually the same as in United Kingdom v. Iceland; therefore, they have not been reproduced. The dissenting opinion of Judge Gros follows his dissenting opinion in United Kingdom v. Iceland at page 747.

[The Court’s Order of August 17, 1972, concerning interim measures of protection, appears at 11 I.L.M. 1069 (1972). The Court’s Judgment of February 2, 1973, concerning the question of jurisdiction, appears at 12 I.L.M. 290 (1973).

[The 1961 Agreement between Iceland and the United Kingdom on fishing in Icelandic waters appears at 11 I.L.M. 490 (1972). The Icelandic Al-thing Resolution on fisheries jurisdiction, dated February 15, 1972, appears at 11 I.L.M. 643 (1972). Icelandic regulations concerning fishery limits, dated July 14, 1972, appear at 11 I.L.M. 1112 (1972). An agreement between Belgium and Iceland on fishing within a fifty-mile limit appears at 11 I.L.M. 941 (1972).]