No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 February 2017
* [Reproduced from the text provided to International Legal Materials. The Final Award of February 23, 1981, appears at 29 I.L.M. 5U1 (1990). The Opinion and Order of the United States District Court for the District of Delaware, issued March 15, 1990, enforcing the Award but staying execution of the Judgment pending compliance with U.S. Libyan Sanctions Regulations, appear at 29 I.L.M. 718 and 743 (1990).]
* [ Reproduced from the text provided to International Legal Materials. The First Award of the Arbitral Tribunal, rendered May 31, 1985, dealt with the question of force majeure. It appears at 29 I.L.M. 565 (1990). The Opinion and Order of the United States District Court for the District of Delaware, issued March 15, 1990, enforcing the Final Award but staying execution of the Judgment pending compliance with U.S. Libyan Sanctions Regulations, appear at 29 I.L.M. 718 and 743 (1990).]
A) Does the United Starts Government's passport order constitute an even: of “force majeure” as defined in Article 22 of the EPSA?
B) If relevant, do the United States Government's export regulation! consitute an event of “force majeure” as defined in Article 22 of the EPSA?
C) Did Sun-Oil withdraw fron the EPSA under Article 3.4 of the contract“…………”
* [29 I.L.M. 599, 600 (1990)]
* [29 I.L.M. 598 (1990)]
* [29 I.L.M. 599 (1990)]
* [29 I.L.M, 610 (1990)]
1 Sic!Read instead “article 25 (1) and (2)”
* [29 I.L.M. 616, 617 (1990)]
* [29 I.L.M. 618 (1990)]
* [29 I.L.M. 618 (1990)]