Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T05:52:47.523Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

World Duty Free Company LTD. v. the Republic of Kenya

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2017

Michael W. Waibel*
Affiliation:
Lauterpacht Centre for International Law, Cambridge University

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Judicial and Similar Proceedings
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

* This text was reproduced and reformatted from the text appearing at the ICSID website (visited January 19, 2006 )< .http://www.worldbank.org/icsid >

1 The most recent example is the New Governance and Anticor-ruption Strategy for the World Bank Group, March 21, 2007.For instance, in November 2006, the World Bank had banned Lahmeyer International GmbH from Bank-financed projects for a period of seven years on the grounds that the company hadbribed the Chief of the Highlands Development of Lesotho; cf.also, United Nations Convention Against Corruption, 41 ILM31 (2004); African Union Convention on Preventing and Com batting Corruption, 41 ILM 1 (2004); OECD Convention on Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials, 37 ILM 1(1998).

2 Award in ICC Case no. 1110, [1994] Arbitration International 277, with a note by Dr. J. Gillis Wetter ’ ‘Issues of Corruption before International Arbitral Tribunals: The Authentic Text and True Meaning of Judge Gunnar Lagergren's 1963 Award in ICC Case no. 1110).