Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T21:58:14.956Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

United States: Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Decision in Libra Bank Limited V. Banco Nacional De Costa Rica (Prejudgment Attachment; Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act; Waiver of Immunity)*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 March 2017

Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Judicial and Similar Proceedings
Information
International Legal Materials , Volume 21 , Issue 3 , May 1982 , pp. 618 - 620
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

[Reproduced from 676 Federal Reporter, 2d Series, 47-50 (1982).

[The U.S. Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act of 1976 appears at 15 I.L.M. 1388 (1976). The House of Representatives Report No. 94-1487 on “Jurisdiction of United States Courts in Suits against Foreign States” appears at 15 I.L.M. 1398 (1976).]

References

2 The district court deferred ruling on defendant's motion to dismiss for lack of in personam jurisdiction.

3 28 U.S.C. § 1610(a) provides in relevant part:

“(a) The property in the United States of a foreign state, as defined in section 1603(a) of this chapter, used for a commercial activity in the United States, shall not be immune from attachment in aid of execution or from execution, upon a judgment entered by a court of the United States or of a State after the effective date of this Act. if—

(1) the foreign state has waived its immunity from attachment in aid of execution or from execution either explicitly or by implication, notwithstanding any withdrawal of the waiver the foreign state may purport to effect except in accordance with the terms of the waiver...”

4 By contrast, the legislative history supplies examples of conduct that could constitute an unintended waiver “by implication” under § 1610(a)(1). See explanation of § 1605(a)(1), H.Rep.No.94-1487, 94th Cong., 2d Sess. 18, reprinted in [1976] U.S.Code Cong. & Ad.News 6604, 6617, expressly discussed as applicable to § 1610(a)(1), id. at 28, (1976] U.S.Code Cong. & Ad.News at 6627.