No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 April 2017
[The case is reported at [1965] 1 All England Law Reports 300-326 (February 9, 1965). Excerpts from the opinions are reproduced with the permission of the publishers, Butterworth & Co. (Publishers) Ltd.]
** [This note was prepared by the editors of International Legal Materials.]
*** [Carl-Zeiss-Stiftung is a charitable foundation that had owned an optical works. The optical works was nationalized by the Russian authorities in 1948. The Court accepted for purposes of argument the foundation’s contention that the nationalization did not touch the “Zeiss” trademarks.]
(11) [1938] 3 All E.R. 80.
(12) [1939] 1 All E.R. 819; [1939] 2 K.B. 544.
(13) [1956] 2 All E.R. 769; [1956] 2 Q.B. 552.
(14) [1938] 2 All E.R. 253; [1938] 2 K.B. 176.
(15) [1938] 2 All E.R. at p. 260; [1938] 2 K.B. at p. 194.
(16) [1924] All E.R. Rep. at p. 399; [1925] A.C. at p. 149.
(18) [1921] 1 K.B. 456.
(19) (1818), 3 Wheat. 246 at p. 324.