Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T16:50:11.822Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (ICTY) (Appeals Chamber): Prosecutor V. Tadić*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 May 2017

Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Judicial and Similar Proceedings
Information
International Legal Materials , Volume 41 , Issue 6 , November 2002 , pp. 1328 - 1341
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

This document was reproduced and reformatted from the text appearing at the ICTY Website (visited November 18, 2002) http://www.un.org/icty.

References

Endnotes

1 Prosecutor v. Duško Tadić, Case No.: IT-94-1 -R, “Request for Review of My Complete Case and Review of the Trial Chamber and Appeals Chamber Proceedings Conducted Before the Hague Tribunal,” 18 June 2001.

2 Prosecutor v. Duško Tadić, Case No.: IT-94-1-R “Motion for Review of the Convictions of Duško Tadić'set out in the Judgements of the Trial Chamber (IT-94- 1-T) and of the Appeals Chamber (IT-94-1-A),” 5 October 2001.

3 Prosecutor v. Duško Tadić, Case No.: IT-94-1-T, “Opinion and Judgement,” 7 May 1997.

4 Prosecutor v. Duško Tadić, Case No.: IT-94-1-A, “Judgement,” 15 July 1999.

5 Prosecutor v. Duško Tadić, Case No.: IT-94-1-A and IT-94-1 Abis, “Judgement in Sentencing Appeals,” 26 January 2000.

6 Prosecutor v. Duško Tadić, Case No.: IT-94-1-A-R77, “Judgement on Allegations of Contempt Against Prior Counsel, Milan Vujin,” 31 January 2000, p. 55.

7 Prosecutor v. Duško Tadić, Case No.: IT-94-1-A-R77, “Appeal Judgement on Allegations of Contempt against Prior Counsel, Milan Vujin,” 27 February 2001.

8 Prosecutor v. Duško Tadić, Case No.: IT-94-1 -R, “Prosecution's Response to Request for Review filed by Duško Tadić,” 29 June 2001.

9 Prosecutor v. DuSco Tadić, Case No.: IT-94-1 -R, “Reply, on Behalf of Duško Tadić, to Prosecution's Response to Request for Review,” 3 July 2001.

10 Id. at p. 2.

11 Prosecutor v. Duško Tadić, Case No.: IT-94-1 -R, “Prosecution's Request on Motion for Review,” 15 October 2001.

12 Prosecutor v. Duško Tadić, Case No.: IT-94-1 -R, “Motion to Exceed Page Limit of Prosecution's Response to ‘Motion for Review of the Convictions of Duško Tadić net out in the Judgements of the Trial Chamber (IT-94-1 -T) and of the Appeals Chamber (IT-94-1 -A)',” I November 2001.

13 Prosecutor v Tadić, Case No.: IT-94-1 -R, “Prosecution Response to ‘Motion for Review of the Convictions of Duško Tadić set out in the Judgements of the Trial Chamber (IT-94-1-T) and of the Appeals Chamber (IT-94-1-A)',” 6 November 2001.

14 Prosecutor v Tadić, Case No.: IT-94-1-R, “Decision Authorizing Response by the Prosecution and Allowing Further time to File a Reply,” 14 December 2001.

15 Tadić Request for Review, p. 1

16 Ibid.

17 Ibid, at p. 2.

18 Motion for Review, para 6.

19 Prosecutor v. Duško Tadić, Case No.: IT-94- 1-R, “Appellant Brief in Relation to Admission of Additional Evidence on Appeals Under Rule 115,” Defense, 4 February 1998.

20 Motion for Review, para 17 (citing Contempt Judgement I, para. 104).

21 Motion for Review, para 18.

22 Motion for Review, para 20 (emphasis omitted).

23 Id. at para 27.

24 Id. at para 38.

25 Id. at para 45.

26 Id. at paras 49-54.

27 Prosecutor v. Zoran KupreSkicet al. Case No.: IT-95-16-A, “Judgement,” para. 113.

28 Response, para 11.

29 Id., para 14.

30 Id. at para 26.

31 Id. at para 29.

32 Id. at para 38.

33 Id. at para 40.

34 Id. at para 48.

35 “Motion (3) to Admit Additional Evidence on Appeal Pursuant to Rule 115 of the rules of Procedure and Evidence,” 19 April 1999. The Appeals Chamber rejected this Motion by an oral decision on 19 April 1999 (T. 20).

36 Response, para 55.

37 Id. at paras 63-65.

38 Id. at para 70.

39 Id. at para 72.

40 Prosecutor v Barayagwiza, “Decision on Prosecutor's Request for Review or Reconsideration,” ICTR-97-19-AR72, 31 March 2000, para 41.

41 Prosecutor v Hazim Delić, Case No.: IT-96-21-R-R119, “Decision on Motion for Review,” 25 April 2002, p. 7.

42 Prosecutor v Goran Jelisić, Case No.: IT-95-10-R, “Decision on Motion for Review,” 2 May 2002, p. 3.

43 Motion for Review, para 2.

44 Response, para 14.

45 Supra n. 40, para 49.

46 Prosecutor v. Dutfco Tadić, Case No. IT-94-1-R, “Ordonnance du president portant affectation de juges à la chambre d'appel,” 5 October 2001, p. 2.

47 Prosecutor v. Laurent Semanza, Case No. ICTR-97-20-A, Arret (Requête en révision de la decision de la Chambre d'appel du 31 mai 2000), 4 May 2001, p. 2.

48 Supra n.42, p. 3.

49 Supra n.41, p. 7.

50 Supra n.40, para 65.

51 Supra n.42, para 15.

52 Id., para 15.

53 Contempt Judgement, paras 131-134.

54 Contempt Judgement, para 44.

55 Id. at para 160.

56 Contempt Judgement, para 46.

57 Prosecutor v. Duško Tadić, Case No.: IT-94-1-A, “Decision of Deputy Registrar Regarding the Assignment of Counsel and the Withdrawal of Lead Counsel for the Accused,” Registry, 19 November 1998.

58 Contempt Judgement, para 33.

59 Trial Chamber's Judgement, para 395.

60 Appeal Chamber's Judgement, para 67.

61 Supra n.42, p. 2.

62 Contempt Judgement, para 160.

63 Id. at para 160.

64 Prosecutor v. Duško Tadić, “Appellant's Brief In Relation to Admission of Additional Evidence on Appeal Under Rule 115,” 2 Feb. 1998.

65 Contempt Judgement, paras 95-101.

66 Id., para 96.

67 Contempt Judgement, paras 125-128.

68 Id. at para 128.

69 Id. at para 149.

70 Id. at para 147.

71 Motion for Review, para 20.

72 Id. at para 167.

73 Id. at para 109.

74 Contempt Judgement, para 103.

75 Trial Chamber's Judgement, para 25.

76 Contempt Judgement, para 108.