Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T05:47:48.931Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

International Court of Justice: Difference Relating to Immunity from Legal Process of a Special Rapporteur of the Commission on Human Rights (Advisory Opinion)*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2017

Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Judicial and Similar Proceedings
Information
International Legal Materials , Volume 38 , Issue 4 , July 1999 , pp. 873 - 917
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

This document was reproduced and reformatted from the text appearing at the ICJ Website (visited5/25/99) <http://www.icj-cij.org>.

References

1 Reparations for Injuries Suffered in the Service of the United Nations, Advisory Opinion, I.C.J. Reports 1949, p. 183.

2 Princess Zizianoffv. Kahn and Bigelow, (1927-28) 4ILR (Annual Digest), p. 384.

3 Japan v. Cheney, (1960) 23 ILR 264.

4 Portugal v. Goncalves, (1990) 82 ILR 115.

5 Szurgelies and Szurgelies v. Spohn, (1992) 89 ILR 44.

6 Reparation for Injuries Suffered in the Service of the United Nations, Advisory Opinion, I.C.J. Reports 1949, p. 179.

7 Ibid.

8 Dossier Nos. 5-8.

9 Dossier No. 7.

10 Para. 66.

1 See Conditions of Admission of a State to Membership in the United Nations (Article 4 of the Charter), Advisory Opinion, 1948, I.C.J. Reports 1947-1948, p. 61.

2 Interpretation of Peace Treaties with Bulgaria, Hungary and Romania, First Phase, I.C.J. Reports 1950, p. 71.

3 Applicability of Article VI, Section 22, of the Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the United Nations, Advisory Opinion, I.C.J. Reports 1989, p. 111.

4 Interpretation of the Greco-Turkish Agreement of 1 December 1926 (Final Protocol, Article IV), Advisory Opinion, 1928, P.C.I.J., Series B, No. 16; Interpretation of Peace Treaties with Bulgaria, Hungary and Romania, First/Second Phase, Advisory Opinion, I.C.J. Reports 1950.

5 Applicability of Article VI, Section 22, of the Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the United Nations, Advisory Opinion, I.C.J. Reports 1989, pp. 195-196.

6 Status of Eastern Carelia, Advisory Opinion, 1923, P.C.I.J., Series B, No. 5, p. 27.