Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T05:45:13.770Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

International Court of Justice: Advisory Opinion in Interpretation of the Agreement between the Who and Egypt*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 April 2017

Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Judicial and Similar Proceedings
Information
International Legal Materials , Volume 20 , Issue 1 , January 1981 , pp. 88 - 150
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

[Reproduced from the text provided by the International Court of Justice.

[The I.C.J. Order of June 6, 1980, with regard to the time limitsfor written statements appears at 19 I.L.M. 965 (1980).

[Article 56 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties appearsat 8 I.L.M. 699 (1969). Article 56 of the International Law Commission's draft articles on treaties concluded between States and internationalorganizations or between international organizations appearsat 18 I.L.M. 1605 (1979).

[Judges Gros, Lachs, Ruda, Mosler, Oda, Ago, El-Erian, and Sette-Camara wrote separate opinions, which appear respectively at pages101, 106, 109, 114, 117, 129, 133, and 141. Judge Morozov wrote adissenting opinion, appended at page 147.]

References

1 According to Article 8, paragraph 1(b), of the Regulations for Registration of Treaties and International Agreements, approved by General Assembly resolution 97(I) of 14 December 1946, the Register shall comprise,inter alia, a record of : “The title given to the instrument by the parties.”

1 It should not be forgotten that at the time Egypt had not even become a party to the Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the Specialized Agencies, which it wasto ratify only later; furthermore, this general convention does not contain clausescomparable with those to be found in an agreement for die establishment of an organization in the territory of a host State, such as Articles III and X of the 1951 Agreement.

1 A question that had become pressing owing to the need to amend the article of the Constitution which provided that the ILO should be established at the seat of theLeague of Nations.

2 See, in connection with all this, the reports of the Conference Delegation on Constitutional Questions on the work of its first session, held in London from 21 Januaryto 15 February 1946(Constittmonul Questions, Part 1, para. 32, p. 24).